Job Evaluation and Role Scope Assessment
A point-factor job evaluation questionnaire for HR and compensation teams grading or re-grading a role — covering decision authority, supervisory scope, effort, and working conditions, with an AI follow-up that pressure-tests the scoring against a real high-stakes task the job has actually handled.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
What is the exact job title of the role you're evaluating?
In 1-2 sentences, what is the main purpose of this job — why does the role exist?
How often does this job involve each of the following?
- Managing a budget or financial resources
- Supervising or directing the work of others
- Solving unique or non-routine problems
- Interacting directly with external customers or clients
- Operating or maintaining equipment or machinery
- +1 more
How much independent judgment does this job require when making decisions?
How many people does this job directly supervise?
- None
- 1-3
- 4-10
- 11-25
- More than 25
What is the minimum education or qualification typically required to perform this job competently?
- No formal qualification required
- High school diploma or equivalent
- Vocational or trade certification
- Bachelor's degree
- Postgraduate or professional degree
Using 100 points total, allocate them across these four factors based on how much each contributes to this job's overall difficulty and value. This is the core of a point-factor job evaluation, so take your time.
- Skill and knowledge required
- Effort (mental and physical)
- Responsibility and accountability
- Working conditions and environment
Rate how much of each factor this job demands.
- Complexity of tasks performed
- Physical effort required
- Mental or emotional effort required
- Consequence of errors or poor decisions
- Exposure to unpleasant or hazardous conditions
Reconstruct the single most complex or high-stakes task this job has required in recent memory: what the situation was, what options were available, and what would have gone wrong with a bad decision. Use it to sanity-check whether the point allocation and factor ratings above — especially responsibility and complexity — actually match the real scope of the work, and flag any mismatch you notice.
Compared to its actual scope of work, how do you think this job's current pay grade or level fits?
- Under-graded — scope exceeds current level
- Fits well
- Over-graded — current level exceeds scope
- Not sure / not applicable
Which department is this job part of? (Template note: replace with your organization's department list before launching.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you personally held or supervised this job?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you. Your responses feed into a job evaluation panel that scores and grades this role against others in the organization.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Combines quantitative point-factor scoring (a 100-point allocation across four compensable factors plus a slider matrix rating factor demands) with qualitative context on the job's actual purpose and duties, giving compensation teams both a defensible number and the reasoning behind it.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to reconstruct the single most complex or high-stakes task the job has handled, then pressure-tests whether the point-factor scores actually match that real-world evidence rather than self-reported impressions.
- Covers the full standard job evaluation dimensions in one flow — decision-making judgment, direct supervisory scope, minimum qualification level, frequency of key demands, and perceived pay-grade fit — so HR doesn't need to stitch together multiple generic forms.
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean panel members get a structured summary of each grading submission rather than raw open-text answers to manually synthesize.
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Job Evaluation and Role Scope Assessment” template?
The template includes 14 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for helping us evaluate this role fairly. We're assessing the job itself — its duties, decisions, and demands — n…” · “What is the exact job title of the role you're evaluating?” · “In 1-2 sentences, what is the main purpose of this job — why does the role exist?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 14 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
University Graduate Exit Experience Poll
Captures how graduating students rate their academics, career readiness, and campus life as they head out the door, plus their post-graduation plans and likelihood to recommend the school. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their lowest-rated aspect instead of settling for a generic score. Built for institutional research and student affairs teams running exit polls each term.
View templateJob Content and Role Fit Survey
Measures how satisfied employees are with the substance of their job — the tasks, autonomy, variety, skill fit, and workload — separate from pay or manager quality. Built for HR and people-ops teams running role-design reviews, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific task or moment behind their lowest-rated aspect of the work.
View templateIT Role Evaluation & Future Staffing Needs Survey
Evaluates how well your current IT team is staffed, skilled, and equipped to meet workload demands, then helps forecast where hiring and budget should go next. Built for IT leaders, People/HR partners, and workforce planners; the AI follow-up interview turns staffing-gap flags and confidence ratings into concrete examples of what broke, what it cost, and what's most fragile going forward.
View templatePersonnel Action Experience and Fairness Survey
For HR teams and people managers who want to know how a promotion, transfer, reclassification, or disciplinary action actually landed with the employee. Covers clarity, timeliness, and perceived fairness of the process, plus a matrix on procedural steps, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific reasons behind the employee's fairness rating rather than a generic satisfaction score.
View templateHeadcount Request & Position Justification Survey
Captures the business case behind a request to open or backfill a role — driver, urgency, cost, alternatives considered, and success metrics — for HR and Finance to evaluate headcount requests consistently. An AI follow-up interview stress-tests the requester's reasoning on why now, why this level, and what happens if the request is delayed or denied.
View templateEmployee Engagement & Satisfaction Assessment
A structured engagement survey for HR teams to measure role satisfaction, workplace drivers, and improvement priorities across departments. Combines scaled measures with AI-moderated qualitative follow-up.
View template