Localization Quality Assessment (LQA) Survey
Captures end-user evaluations of translated content across fluency, cultural fit, intent accuracy, and tone. Designed for LQA teams seeking structured feedback to prioritize localization improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
For the following questions, please think about your most recent session using a localized version of our product—ideally within the last 30 days.
The localized text was free of grammar and spelling errors.
The localized content felt culturally appropriate for my locale.
The localized text accurately preserved the intended meaning of the original content.
The overall formality level of the localized content felt…
- Much too informal
- Slightly too informal
- About right
- Slightly too formal
- Much too formal
We'd like to explore your localization experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time. Your feedback directly helps us improve the quality of localized experiences across all our products.
When did you last use a localized version of our product?
- Today
- Yesterday
- 3–7 days ago
- 8–30 days ago
- More than 30 days ago
- Not sure
The localized text sounded natural, as if written by a native speaker.
Which of the following elements, if any, felt awkward or out of place? Select all that apply.
- Idioms or sayings
- Humor or jokes
- Examples or scenarios
- Date, time, or measurement formats
- Address or phone formats
- Honorifics, titles, or formality level
- Images or symbols
- Currency or pricing formats
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Instructions and guidance in the localized content were clear and easy to follow.
Approximately how many localization issues did you notice during your session?
- None
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts, examples, or suggestions about the localized experience.
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Which language or locale are you evaluating today?
- Spanish (Spain)
- Spanish (Latin America)
- French (France)
- French (Canada)
- German
- Italian
- Portuguese (Brazil)
- Portuguese (Portugal)
- Japanese
- Korean
- Chinese (Simplified)
- Chinese (Traditional)
- Arabic
- Other (please specify)
The localized text was easy to read and understand.
If you noticed something that felt culturally off, please describe one example and how you would improve it.
Please rank the following aspects of localization quality in order of importance to you (1 = most important).
- Accurate meaning
- Cultural fit
- Readability and flow
- Consistent terminology
- Tone and voice alignment
- Brevity and conciseness
In which country or region do you currently live?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- Germany
- France
- Spain
- Italy
- Brazil
- Portugal
- Japan
- South Korea
- Mexico
- Argentina
- Colombia
- Other (please specify)
Where did you encounter the localized text? Select all that apply.
- App/website UI
- Onboarding or tutorials
- Help Center or FAQs
- Marketing pages or ads
- Transactional emails or SMS
- Customer support chat
- Legal/Terms
- In-app notifications
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the localized language you experienced?
How would you rate your proficiency in the source language (e.g., English)?
- Native or bilingual
- Advanced (fluent)
- Intermediate (conversational)
- Beginner (basic)
- No proficiency
How would you rate your proficiency in the target locale language you evaluated?
- Native or bilingual
- Advanced (fluent)
- Intermediate (conversational)
- Beginner (basic)
- No proficiency
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions covering grammar/spelling, natural phrasing, readability, cultural appropriateness, and intent-accuracy of the translated content — the core LQA dimensions
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe deeper into any cultural or tone issues a respondent flags, going beyond a static rating
- Captures context (locale, where the text was encountered, source and target language proficiency) so LQA teams can segment and prioritize issues by locale
- Ends with an auto-generated report structure supported by transparent, reviewable AI prompts, unlike closed-box scoring in generic quality templates
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Translation Quality & Localization UX Assessment
Measures translation quality, tonal appropriateness, and terminology consistency for multilingual digital products. Designed for product and localization teams seeking diagnostic feedback to improve global user experience.
View templateLive Chat vs. Async Messaging: Support Channel Preference Survey
Measures customer preferences, satisfaction, and response-time expectations across live chat and asynchronous messaging channels to guide support channel investment and design decisions.
View templateKnowledge Base Content Effectiveness Survey
Measures article findability, clarity, completeness, and task-completion outcomes for knowledge base users. Use to identify content gaps and prioritize help center improvements.
View templateService Reliability & Pricing Transparency Assessment
Evaluates customer perceptions of service uptime, availability confidence, pricing clarity, and security trust. Designed for product and CX teams seeking actionable diagnostics on reliability and transparency pain points.
View templatePost-Purchase Shopping Experience & CSAT Survey
Measures overall satisfaction, Net Promoter Score, and key experience drivers across the end-to-end shopping journey. Designed for retail and ecommerce teams seeking actionable insights on product, delivery, checkout, and support touchpoints.
View templateCustomer Churn Risk & Retention Drivers Survey
Identifies at-risk B2B customers through usage patterns, perceived value, and churn intent, then surfaces the retention levers most likely to prevent cancellation. Designed for product, CS, and growth teams managing subscription-based accounts.
View template