On-Device Personalization Trust & Privacy Preferences Survey
Measures user trust, comfort boundaries, and permission preferences for on-device personalization features. Designed for product and privacy teams validating data-handling approaches before launch.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which of the following devices do you use at least once a week? Select all that apply.
- Smartphone
- Tablet
- Smartwatch
- Laptop or desktop computer
- Smart TV
- Smart speaker
- None of these
In the past 3 months, which of the following on-device personalization features have you personally used? Select all that apply.
- Keyboard autocorrect or next-word suggestions
- Photos grouped by faces or scenes on your device
- Voice assistant that processes commands locally
- App suggestions based on on-device usage patterns
- Health or fitness insights processed on your device
- None of these
Overall, how much do you trust on-device personalization to protect your data privacy?
Please rank the following data types from most comfortable (1) to least comfortable (6) for on-device personalization to use.
- Contacts metadata (e.g., how often you contact someone)
- Typing patterns (not message content)
- Browsing history on this device
- Location history
- Photos metadata (e.g., timestamps, scenes)
- Health and fitness sensor data
Imagine a keyboard app offers on-device learning with an optional encrypted cloud backup to sync predictions across your devices. Which option would you choose?
- On-device learning only (no cloud backup)
- On-device learning plus encrypted cloud backup
- Cloud backup only
- I would not use personalization in this app
We'd like to explore your thoughts on on-device personalization in a bit more depth. A short AI-guided conversation will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help improve on-device personalization features and privacy practices.
What is your primary smartphone platform?
- Apple iOS
- Google Android
- Other or no smartphone
Thinking about the past 30 days, how satisfied are you with the on-device personalization feature you used most often?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "I understand how on-device personalization uses my data."
Which of the following types of data, if used for personalization, should never leave your device? Select all that apply.
- Contacts metadata
- Typing patterns (not content)
- Browsing history
- Location history
- Photos metadata
- Health and fitness sensor data
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like companies to know about your data boundaries and preferences?
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Was there anything about that feature that felt intrusive or unclear? If so, please describe it briefly.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "On-device personalization meaningfully improves my daily experience with my devices."
Which permission approach would you prefer for on-device personalization?
- Ask every time data is first used
- Ask once per data type, then remember my choice
- One-time setup with a clear dashboard to change settings later
- No prompts; features off by default unless I enable them
In which region do you currently reside?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Australia
- India
- Other
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "I feel in control of what data on-device features can access."
How important is it to you to have a visible privacy dashboard on your device?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or vocational training
- Associate degree (2-year)
- Bachelor's degree (4-year)
- Postgraduate degree
- Prefer not to say
In your own words, what does "on-device personalization" mean to you?
Please rank the following from most important (1) to least important (5) when it comes to on-device personalization.
- Transparency about what data is used
- Speed and responsiveness of personalized features
- Accuracy and relevance of suggestions
- Assurance that data never leaves my device
- Easy controls to turn features on or off
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker
- Unemployed and seeking work
- Not seeking employment
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Pairs multiple opinion-scale trust and agreement items (understanding of data use, perceived security, sense of control) so product and privacy teams get a multi-dimensional trust profile, not a single satisfaction score.
- Uses ranking exercises that force respondents to trade off comfort across specific data types and priorities, surfacing real permission boundaries rather than abstract approval ratings.
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into open-ended reasoning after the structured questions, catching nuance and edge cases a fixed-question form would miss.
- Combines closed permission-preference and multiple-choice questions with open-text prompts on what felt intrusive or unclear, then rolls everything into an auto-generated report for privacy and product stakeholders.
SurveySparrow
New Product Launch Questionnaire Template | Product Survey QuestionsThis is a general market-research questionnaire for gauging reactions to a new product launch, not a privacy- or trust-specific instrument. It's a fielding-ready template but covers broad appeal/pricing/interest questions rather than data-handling comfort, permission models, or privacy dashboards. Useful as a generic launch-validation survey, not as a substitute for a dedicated on-device personalization trust study.
What it does well
- Ready-to-deploy generic template for gauging early reactions to a new product or feature
- Likely covers broad market-validation angles like interest, pricing, and appeal
- Simple structured format that's fast to launch and analyze
Where it falls short
- No privacy-, trust-, or permission-specific question set for personalization features
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why users feel intrusive or unclear about a feature
- No published methodology on automated response scoring or prompt transparency
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “On-Device Personalization Trust & Privacy Preferences Survey” template?
The template includes 25 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about your experiences with on-device personalization and data p…” · “Which of the following devices do you use at least once a week? Select all that apply.” · “In the past 3 months, which of the following on-device personalization features have you personally used? Select all tha…”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 25 questions in about 11 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Employee MFA Friction & Recovery Assessment
Measures employee friction with multi-factor authentication prompts, backup method clarity, and step-up authentication impact to guide security UX improvements and reduce authentication-related workflow disruptions.
View templateData Privacy Trust & Consent Clarity Survey
Measures customer trust in data handling, perceived consent clarity, and privacy control preferences. Designed for e-commerce teams seeking to improve transparency, optimize opt-in flows, and inform GDPR/CCPA compliance strategies.
View templateConsumer Data Trust & Privacy Perceptions Survey
Measures consumer trust in organizational data handling, breach response expectations, and permission transparency. Use with general consumer panels to benchmark trust levels and identify priority improvements for privacy practices.
View templateOn-Device AI Training: Consumer Trust & Privacy Perceptions
Measures consumer awareness, trust, privacy concerns, and adoption intentions regarding on-device AI training. Designed for product, UX, and privacy teams seeking to understand how users perceive and evaluate local AI learning features.
View templateUser Trust & Consent Preferences for Privacy-Preserving Analytics
Measures users' comprehension of privacy-preserving analytics techniques, trust in identity protection, and preferences for consent controls and defaults. Designed for UX researchers and product teams evaluating analytics transparency features.
View templateConsumer Personalization Comfort, Privacy & Fatigue Assessment
Measures consumer comfort with personalized content, identifies privacy boundaries and data-sharing thresholds, and pinpoints messaging frequency limits to help marketing teams calibrate personalization strategies without triggering fatigue or backlash.
View template