Q01
Message
All templatesFinance & Insurance
Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment
Assesses treasury risk visibility, counterparty exposure management practices, and control effectiveness. Designed for treasury, risk, and front-office professionals to benchmark current capabilities and prioritize improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
26 questions · ~11 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
How directly are you involved in counterparty exposure management?
- Directly responsible
- Regularly involved
- Occasionally consulted
- Aware but not involved
Q03
Opinion Scale
How clear is your organization's treasury risk landscape at present?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q04
Opinion Scale
How would you rate your organization's visibility into consolidated counterparty exposures over the past 30 days?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:No visibilityMax:Full visibility
Q05
Opinion Scale
Over the past 6 months, how clearly defined have roles and responsibilities been for limit setting and overrides?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q06
Opinion Scale
How adequate is your organization's current system support for counterparty exposure aggregation?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely inadequateMax:Fully adequate
Q07
Opinion Scale
Over the past 30 days, how timely has treasury risk reporting been to key stakeholders?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all timelyMax:Highly timely
Q08
Multiple Choice
What is your primary role or function?
- Treasury operations
- Risk management
- Front office/trading
- Finance/controllership
- Technology/IT
- Compliance/Legal
- Other (please specify)
Q09
Long Text
If you could change one thing next quarter to improve counterparty exposure management, what would it be?
Q10
Ranking
Rank the following treasury risks by criticality for the next 3 months (1 = most critical).
- Liquidity risk
- Counterparty/credit risk
- Foreign exchange risk
- Interest rate risk
- Payment fraud/cyber risk
- Regulatory/compliance risk
Drag to rank
Q11
Multiple Choice
How often are counterparty exposure figures refreshed or updated in your organization?
- Real-time/streaming
- Hourly
- Daily
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Not sure
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which method does your organization primarily use to estimate potential future exposure (PFE)?
- Simple add-on factors
- Historical simulation
- Monte Carlo simulation
- Standardized approach (e.g., SA-CCR)
- Not sure
Q13
Opinion Scale
How adequate is your organization's current system support for collateral management?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely inadequateMax:Fully adequate
Q14
Ranking
Rank the following areas by how much improvement would reduce treasury risk over the next quarter (1 = greatest impact).
- Data quality and reconciliations
- Systems automation for aggregation
- Limit framework (setting/monitoring)
- Collateral management processes
- Reporting speed and accuracy
- Stress testing and scenarios
- Training and process clarity
Drag to rank
Q15
Multiple Choice
What is your job level?
- Analyst/Associate
- Manager
- Director
- Executive
- Other
Q16
AI Interview
We'd like to explore your perspectives on treasury risk and counterparty exposure in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Q17
Multiple Choice
Which techniques does your organization currently use to mitigate counterparty exposure? (Select all that apply)
- Bilateral netting
- CSA/collateral agreements
- Counterparty exposure limits
- Diversification across counterparties
- Guarantees or credit insurance
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Q18
Multiple Choice
How frequently has your organization performed exposure stress tests in the past 6 months?
- Monthly
- Quarterly
- Semi-annually
- Annually or less
- Not performed
- Not sure
Q19
Opinion Scale
How adequate is your organization's current system support for limit monitoring and breach alerts?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely inadequateMax:Fully adequate
Q20
Dropdown
How many years have you been in your current role?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–6 years
- 7–10 years
- More than 10 years
Q21
Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform treasury risk improvement priorities for next quarter.
Q22
Dropdown
Approximately how many counterparty limit breaches occurred in your organization in the last 90 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
- Not sure / not tracked
Q23
Opinion Scale
How adequate is your organization's current system support for treasury risk reporting and dashboards?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely inadequateMax:Fully adequate
Q24
Multiple Choice
Which region do you primarily support?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Multiple regions
Q25
Long Text
Please briefly describe any workflow gaps that have caused risk or delays in the past 3 months.
Q26
Multiple Choice
Which teams do you primarily support? (Select all that apply)
- Treasury
- Trading
- Corporate finance
- Payments
- Other (please specify)
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview segment that lets treasury and risk professionals elaborate on exposure gaps in their own words, beyond fixed-choice questions
- Combines quantitative benchmarking (opinion scales on system support for exposure monitoring, collateral management, limit monitoring, and reporting) with ranking questions to prioritize the most critical treasury risks and improvement areas
- Captures workflow gaps and process delays through open-text responses, plus role, seniority, region, and team-coverage segmentation for benchmarking across the organization
- Ends with an AI-guided qualitative interview on treasury risk perspectives, giving richer context than a static questionnaire alone
Jotform
Risk-Management Self-Assessment Form TemplateA generic risk-management self-assessment form builder template rather than a treasury or counterparty-specific instrument. It's a customizable static form meant for quick self-assessment rather than deep benchmarking, useful as a starting structure but not purpose-built for treasury/counterparty risk controls.
What it does well
- Simple, quick-to-deploy self-assessment format
- Drag-and-drop form customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Broad applicability across general risk-management contexts
Where it falls short
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up probing on flagged risk areas
- Not tailored to treasury/counterparty exposure concepts (limits, breaches, CVA/PFE methods, collateral)
- No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation described
QuestionPro
Risk Culture Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplatePositioned around risk culture and general risk-assessment survey questions, functioning partly as a guide/sample-questionnaire resource rather than a ready-to-field treasury-specific template. It's useful for broad organizational risk-culture sentiment but doesn't address counterparty exposure mechanics.
What it does well
- Established survey-platform infrastructure for distribution and reporting
- Sample questions cover general risk-culture attitudes and perceptions
- Familiar multiple-choice/scale question formats
Where it falls short
- Focused on risk culture broadly, not counterparty exposure, limit breaches, or collateral/CVA-PFE specifics
- Static question set — no adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to probe control gaps
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment” template?
The template includes 26 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment. This survey gathers your perspectives on treasury risk…” · “How directly are you involved in counterparty exposure management?” · “How clear is your organization's treasury risk landscape at present?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 26 questions in about 11 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Finance & Insurance
Auto Insurance Telematics Adoption & Attitudes Survey
Measures auto insurance policyholders' attitudes toward usage-based insurance (UBI) programs, covering perceived fairness, privacy comfort, feature preferences, discount expectations, and enrollment intent across current, former, and prospective telematics users.
View templateFinance & Insurance
Third-Party Risk Disclosure Clarity Assessment
Evaluates how clearly third-party risk disclosures and mitigations are communicated across teams. Designed for GRC, security, procurement, and other stakeholders who interact with vendor risk information, this instrument identifies gaps in accessibility, readability, and actionability to drive targeted improvements.
View templateFinance & Insurance
AI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment
Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.
View templateFinance & Insurance
Red Team Program Effectiveness Assessment
Collects structured stakeholder feedback on red-team risk coverage, report quality, and remediation follow-through to identify actionable program improvements across security, engineering, and leadership functions.
View templateFinance & Insurance
Vendor Security and Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Assesses a vendor's security controls, certifications, data handling, and incident history for procurement, security, and compliance teams running third-party risk reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the vendor's single most significant unresolved risk instead of accepting a checklist of certifications at face value.
View templateFinance & Insurance
AI Governance & Risk Controls Readiness Assessment
Measures organizational readiness across AI policy clarity, approval workflows, risk tiering, and control maturity. Designed for cross-functional teams involved in AI development, deployment, or oversight.
View template