Education & Academic

Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey

Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분

Q01

메시지

Welcome to the Adjunct Faculty Experience Survey. This survey is designed to understand the experiences of adjunct and part-time instructors in higher education. Your responses will help inform improvements to pay, support, resources, and working conditions. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.

Q02

객관식

Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?

Adjunct or part-time instructor
Full-time non-tenure track
Tenure-track or tenured
Graduate TA/Instructor
Multiple roles (including adjunct)
Other

Q03

의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q04

의견 척도

How responsive has your department or program been to your questions or requests this term?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not at all responsive최대:Extremely responsive

Q05

의견 척도

How would you rate the fairness of your compensation relative to your workload this term?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair

Q06

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the technology and learning management system (LMS) available for your courses?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q07

순위 매기기

Please rank the following areas from most to least in need of improvement for adjunct instructors at your institution.

Compensation and benefits
Course scheduling predictability
Communication from department
Access to teaching resources
Recognition and respect

드래그하여 순위 지정

Q08

객관식

What type of institution are you teaching at this term?

Public 2-year (community/technical college)
Public 4-year university
Private nonprofit
Private for-profit
Other
Prefer not to say

Q09

메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to inform improvements for adjunct and part-time instructors at your institution. We appreciate your time and honest feedback.

Q10

드롭다운

How many courses are you teaching this term?

0 (not currently teaching)
1
2
3
4
5 or more

Q11

의견 척도

At the start of this term, how prepared did you feel to teach your assigned course(s)?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not at all prepared최대:Very well prepared

Q12

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the onboarding or orientation support you received for your current course(s)?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q13

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your per-course pay rate?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q14

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the course materials and curriculum support provided to you?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q15

AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience as an adjunct instructor? Please share your thoughts and the moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.

Q16

드롭다운

How long have you taught in an adjunct or part-time capacity in total?

Less than 1 year
1–2 years
3–5 years
6–10 years
11–15 years
16–20 years
More than 20 years

Q17

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with access to mentoring or peer support from other faculty?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q18

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your access to benefits (e.g., health insurance, retirement)?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q19

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your physical workspace or classroom facilities?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q20

객관식

What is your primary broad discipline area?

STEM
Social sciences
Humanities
Arts
Business
Health professions
Education
Other
Prefer not to say

Q21

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with opportunities for professional development available to you?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q22

의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the predictability and timeliness of your pay?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q23

드롭다운

Typically, how far in advance are you notified of a new course assignment?

Less than 1 week
1–2 weeks
3–4 weeks
1–2 months
More than 2 months
Not applicable

Q24

객관식

In which region is your institution located?

Northeast (U.S.)
Midwest (U.S.)
South (U.S.)
West (U.S.)
Outside the U.S.
Prefer not to say

Q25

객관식

What is your gender identity?

Woman
Man
Non-binary
Prefer to self-describe
Prefer not to say

Q26

객관식

What is your age range?

Under 25
25–34
35–44
45–54
55–64
65 or older
Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on pay equity, benefits, and pay predictability with an AI follow-up interview that asks each respondent to identify their single most important improvement area, generating richer qualitative context than fixed-choice forms alone
Covers the full adjunct experience lifecycle in one instrument — onboarding, mentoring, professional development, scheduling notice, LMS/tech support, and classroom facilities — rather than a generic faculty satisfaction snapshot
Includes a ranking question forcing respondents to prioritize improvement areas (pay, support, resources, scheduling), giving administrators a clear action hierarchy instead of just averages
Segments results by institution type, discipline, region, appointment length, and demographics, enabling equity-focused subgroup analysis specific to adjunct/part-time status

QuestionPro

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey

A general faculty satisfaction template covering broad workplace topics like workload and campus climate, not adjunct-specific pay equity or scheduling predictability. It's a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview tool. Useful as a generic starting point but requires heavy customization for adjunct/part-time-specific compensation issues.

잘하는 점

Established survey platform with a ready-made faculty satisfaction template
Covers general faculty experience topics applicable across institution types
Likely offers standard survey logic and reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
No adjunct-specific focus on per-course pay, benefits access, or assignment notice timing
No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey Questions

SurveyMonkey's faculty satisfaction template targets general faculty sentiment rather than the specific pay-equity and scheduling concerns unique to adjunct and part-time instructors. It's a static question bank designed for broad customization, not a purpose-built adjunct compensation instrument. Reporting is standard dashboard analytics rather than narrative, interview-based insight.

잘하는 점

Widely used platform with strong survey distribution and basic analytics tools
Faculty-focused template saves time versus building from scratch
Simple to customize question wording for different institution types

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to probe pay equity or workload concerns
Not tailored to adjunct-specific issues like per-course pay or last-minute scheduling
No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

자주 묻는 질문