AI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey
Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 7 days, how often did you use our AI features?
- 0 times
- 1–2 times
- 3–5 times
- 6–10 times
- More than 10 times
In the past 30 days, did you encounter any AI output that was inaccurate, unhelpful, or not working as expected?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
This section asks about your experience reporting the issue. If you did not encounter an issue, you may skip ahead.
Right now, how much do you trust the AI's outputs for your tasks?
Based on your experiences, what would make AI issue reports easier to file and more complete?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time — your feedback helps us improve AI error reporting and follow-up. Your responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate.
What did you mainly use the AI for in the past 7 days? Select all that apply.
- Drafting or writing
- Data analysis
- Brainstorming ideas
- Customer support tasks
- Code assistance
- Research or lookup
- Summarization
- Planning or scheduling
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about your most recent AI issue, did you report it?
- Yes, using the in-product report button
- Yes, I contacted support
- Yes, I posted in a community or forum
- I tried but couldn't complete the report
- No, I didn't report it
Compared to before your most recent AI issue, how has your trust in the AI changed?
We'd like to learn more about your experience with AI errors and how they affect your trust. Please share your thoughts.
Which gender identities do you use? Select all that apply.
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How easy was it to find and complete the error reporting process?
How confident are you using AI assistance for important or high-stakes decisions?
Where do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Prefer not to say
What, if anything, made reporting harder? Select all that apply.
- Couldn't find where to report
- Too many steps
- Unsure what information was needed
- Concerned about sharing data
- Report form was buggy
- No time
- Not worth the effort
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
How likely are you to report AI issues you encounter in the future?
What best describes your current role or work context?
- Full-time employee
- Part-time employee
- Self-employed or freelancer
- Student
- Not currently working
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how well did the reporting form allow you to describe the issue you experienced?
After submitting a report, did you receive any follow-up (such as an acknowledgment or resolution)?
- Yes, within 24 hours
- Yes, within 3 days
- Yes, after a week or more
- Not yet
- I did not submit a report
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
AI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey
Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.
템플릿 보기생성형 AI 신뢰, 안전성 및 가드레일 선호도 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구에 대한 소비자 신뢰, 인지된 안전성 위험, 투명성 기대치, 가드레일 선호도를 측정하여 책임 있는 AI 제품 설계 및 정책 수립에 활용합니다.
템플릿 보기온디바이스 AI 학습: 소비자 신뢰 및 프라이버시 인식
온디바이스 AI 학습에 대한 소비자 인지도, 신뢰, 프라이버시 우려, 채택 의향을 측정합니다. 사용자가 로컬 AI 학습 기능을 어떻게 인식하고 평가하는지 이해하고자 하는 제품, UX, 프라이버시 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Edge AI Governance & Monitoring Maturity Assessment
Assesses organizational readiness across edge AI governance, monitoring, risk, and MLOps practices. Designed for AI/ML leaders, DevOps, and compliance stakeholders to benchmark maturity and prioritize investment.
템플릿 보기Developer Content Filter False Positive Impact Assessment
Assess how content filter false positives affect developer productivity, workflow disruption, and tool adoption decisions. Designed for developer experience researchers and tooling teams seeking actionable improvement priorities from software practitioners.
템플릿 보기AI Bug Bounty: Scope, Fairness & Incentive Evaluation
An internal stakeholder survey evaluating scope clarity, decision fairness, and incentive effectiveness in your AI bug bounty program over the past 6 months to guide program improvements.
템플릿 보기