Do you currently hold a teaching role (full-time, part-time, or adjunct) at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
This is a general-purpose PD needs assessment template, not one focused specifically on AI readiness or instructor technology proficiency. It's a fielding-ready static form that could be adapted but would need significant editing to cover AI literacy, workload concerns, or institutional AI support. Good for basic PD topic/format preference gathering, but shallower than a purpose-built AI readiness instrument.
A broader professional development survey template rather than one designed around AI integration readiness specifically. It's a fixed, fielding-ready question set suitable for general training feedback, but would require heavy customization to capture AI literacy, pedagogical confidence with AI, or workload/time-cost concerns. Useful as a generic PD benchmarking tool rather than an AI-readiness diagnostic.
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
A research survey examining how AI tools are reshaping academic integrity norms among college and university students. Covers policy awareness, personal usage patterns, acceptability perceptions, peer behavior observations, and policy recommendations.
템플릿 보기An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
템플릿 보기An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
템플릿 보기Measures how effectively employees apply recent training to their jobs, identifying barriers, enablers, and perceived outcomes to improve learning transfer and training ROI.
템플릿 보기Assesses how well current curriculum, resources, and support structures meet learner needs, identifying gaps and priorities to guide program improvements. Designed for enrolled students or active learners in formal or informal educational settings.
템플릿 보기A structured pilot review instrument for expert panelists or cognitive interview participants to evaluate draft survey items on clarity, redundancy, response-option quality, and face validity before fielding.
템플릿 보기