AI Upskilling Program Impact & Skill Transfer Survey
Measures whether an AI skills training program actually changed how employees work — confidence gains, specific skill areas, and real on-the-job use — for L&D teams evaluating a completed cohort. The AI follow-up interview digs into what participants actually did differently at work and what's blocking wider adoption.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which AI upskilling program or track did you complete?
- (Replace with Program A)
- (Replace with Program B)
- (Replace with Program C)
Before this program, how confident were you using AI tools (e.g., generative AI assistants) in your daily work?
Now that you've completed the program, how confident are you using AI tools in your daily work?
How much did the program improve each of the following skills?
- Writing effective prompts to get useful AI output
- Choosing the right AI tool for a given task
- Verifying and fact-checking AI-generated content
- Integrating AI into your existing workflows
- Understanding ethical and responsible use guidelines
In the last 30 days, how often have you used skills from this program in your actual work tasks?
- Not at all
- Once or twice
- About weekly
- Several times a week
- Daily
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the AI upskilling program?
Which of these topics would be most and least valuable to emphasize in future AI training?
- Prompt engineering fundamentals
- Selecting the right AI tool for the task
- Verifying and fact-checking AI outputs
- Integrating AI into daily workflows
- Data privacy and responsible use
- Advanced or technical AI applications
- Hands-on practice with real work scenarios
Reconstruct a specific, concrete example of the respondent using an AI skill from this program in their actual work in the last 30 days — what the task was, what they did, and what the outcome was. If they said they've used it 'not at all', probe what's stopping them: forgotten skills, no relevant use case, lack of tool access, or lack of confidence. Anchor follow-ups on their stated confidence change and their frequency-of-use answer.
How likely are you to recommend this AI upskilling program to a colleague in a similar role?
Which best describes your role or department?
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- 5+ years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed into a report on how well this program is changing day-to-day AI use, shared with the training team.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Pairs before/after confidence ratings with a skills matrix so L&D teams can quantify perceived skill gains by area, not just overall satisfaction
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific, concrete example of the participant applying an AI skill on the job — surfacing real skill transfer instead of self-reported intent
- Uses a max-diff exercise to prioritize which topics to emphasize in future cohorts, giving program owners actionable curriculum direction
- Combines usage frequency, recommendation likelihood, and role/tenure segmentation questions with an auto-generated report, so evaluation and stakeholder reporting are built in rather than a separate step
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Student Wellbeing and Academic Stress Survey
Measures student stress levels, workload, sleep habits, and use of mental health support, then identifies the biggest barriers keeping students from asking for help. Built for student affairs, wellness centers, and academic advisors; the AI follow-up reconstructs a specific recent moment a student needed support but didn't seek it, and what would have changed that.
템플릿 보기Professional Development Needs & Learning Preferences Survey
Measures where employees feel skill gaps, which learning formats and time investments actually work for them, and how their career goals should shape the L&D roadmap. Built for HR and L&D teams planning training budgets and programs. An AI follow-up digs into the specific skill gap and career goal each person names to surface concrete blockers, not just checkbox preferences.
템플릿 보기어린이집·보육 서비스 학부모 만족도 조사
부모가 자녀의 안전에 대해 얼마나 안심하는지, 시설이 일상적인 소통을 얼마나 잘하는지, 교직원이 아이들에게 얼마나 따뜻하게 대하는지, 발달 활동이 연령에 적절하다고 느끼는지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 질문은 낮은 안전 또는 소통 점수 뒤에 있는 구체적인 사건이나 부족한 부분을 파고들어, 점수만으로는 놓칠 수 있는 세부 사항을 드러냅니다.
템플릿 보기Research Informed Consent & Enrollment
A complete consent flow for research studies: plain-language study information, granular consent statements with a comprehension check, signature capture, and contact enrollment. Built for IRB-style requirements — participants confirm they understand, not just that they scrolled.
템플릿 보기생성형 AI와 학생 학습 경험 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구가 학습 심화, 비판적 사고, 지식 유지, 메타인지 인식 전반에 걸쳐 학생의 학습 성과에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 측정하는 연구 도구입니다. 사전/사후 및 실험 연구 설계를 위해 고안되었습니다. 예상 소요 시간: 10~14분.
템플릿 보기AI Ethics Awareness Survey for Students
An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
템플릿 보기