Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Education & Academic
Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey
Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
Which format best describes the train-the-trainer program you completed?
- In-person
- Live virtual
- Hybrid (in-person + virtual)
- Self-paced online
Q03
의견 척도필수
How well did the program prepare you to design a training session for your own audience from scratch?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not prepared at all최대:Fully prepared
Q04
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about the program?
4개 행 × 5개 열
- The content covered was directly relevant to my training role
- The practice sessions and feedback helped me improve my facilitation skills
- The materials and job aids were easy to reuse back on the job
- The pace of the program allowed me to actually absorb the material
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
평점 척도필수
How would you rate the trainer who led your train-the-trainer program at modeling the skills they were teaching?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q06
객관식필수
In the last 30 days, how many times have you delivered a training session using what you learned in the program?
- None
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6 or more times
Q07
의견 척도필수
How confident are you handling tough participant questions or pushback during a session you're leading?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these skills from the program have been most and least valuable in your actual training work?
- Assessing learner needs before a session
- Applying adult learning principles
- Core facilitation techniques (questioning, activities, pacing)
- Giving and receiving feedback
- Managing difficult or disengaged participants
- Designing slides and materials
- Delivering training through virtual tools
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable최악:Least valuable
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct a specific training session the respondent has led since completing the program: what topic, what audience, what they did differently because of the program, and what actually happened when they applied it. Anchor on one concrete facilitation skill (from questioning, activity design, feedback, or handling difficult participants) and probe whether it worked as taught or needed adapting. If they say they haven't delivered training yet, probe what's blocking them from applying it and how prepared they feel for the first time they do.
Q10
장문형
What one change would most improve this train-the-trainer program for the next group of trainers?
Q11
객관식
How many years of experience do you have as a trainer or facilitator?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with other trainers' feedback to improve how we prepare people to teach.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific training session the respondent led, going beyond self-reported impressions to actual delivery behavior
- Combines a matrix of agreement statements, a max-diff ranking of which skills proved most/least valuable, and confidence/rating scales to triangulate skill transfer from multiple angles
- Asks directly about real-world application (sessions delivered in the last 30 days, confidence handling pushback) rather than stopping at satisfaction with the course itself
- Closes with an open-ended question on what one change would most improve the program, feeding directly into an auto-generated report for program owners
QuestionPro
Effectiveness of Training (For Trainers) Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and question bank for evaluating trainer effectiveness, closely aligned to the train-the-trainer topic. It reads more as a reference list of questions than a single ready-to-field survey flow. Useful for drafting your own instrument, but the reflection is limited to self-report ratings.
잘하는 점
- Directly topical to trainer effectiveness evaluation
- Provides a broad sample question bank covering multiple facets of trainer performance
- Backed by an established survey platform with reporting and distribution tools
아쉬운 점
- Static self-report questions only, no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specifics of a real session
- No mechanism to reconstruct or verify what actually happened in a training session delivered afterward
- No published methodology on how responses are scored or weighted
Jotform
Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form TemplateA general training effectiveness evaluation form, more oriented to rating a single training event than assessing whether trainers themselves can now facilitate and transfer skills on the job. Fielding-ready as a form, but generic rather than train-the-trainer specific.
잘하는 점
- Quick to deploy and customize using Jotform's form builder
- Familiar rating-scale format for general training feedback
- Supports basic branching and integrations typical of Jotform forms
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real session the respondent later delivered
- Focused on evaluating a training event, not trainer skill transfer or facilitation confidence over time
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
Typeform
Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational-style training evaluation form focused on standard satisfaction and effectiveness questions, not specifically on the train-the-trainer skill-transfer use case. It's a fielding-ready template, but limited to fixed question flows without follow-up probing.
잘하는 점
- Clean, conversational form UX that can improve completion rates
- Easy to customize question wording and branching logic
- Good for quick pulse-style training feedback
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into how a respondent actually applied training skills
- No voice interview or guided task/screen-share option for richer evidence of skill transfer
- No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Education & Academic
Distance Learning Experience Survey for Students
Captures how school students are experiencing remote or online classes — focus, workload, technology access, and connection with teachers and classmates — with an AI follow-up that digs into the single biggest obstacle they name. Built for school administrators, ed-tech teams, and researchers evaluating distance learning programs.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Parent Experience With Distance Learning Survey
Captures how well remote or hybrid learning is working for your students and families — engagement, workload, tech reliability, and communication — with an AI follow-up that digs into the single biggest obstacle parents are facing at home.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey
Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Advancement Opportunities and Training Access Survey
Measures how clearly employees understand what it takes to move up, how well current training and development options meet their needs, and what's actually slowing their progress — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real advancement attempt instead of collecting generic complaints about 'lack of opportunity.'
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey
Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Student Gentrification and Neighborhood Change Survey
Captures how residents, students, and local business owners experience neighborhood change linked to growing student populations — rents, displacement, local business shifts, and town-gown relations — with an AI follow-up that digs into specific, lived examples behind the numbers instead of vague impressions.
템플릿 보기