모든 템플릿
Marketing & Growth

B2B Brand Awareness and Perception Tracker

Tracks unaided and aided awareness, consideration, and perceived positioning of your brand versus named competitors among B2B buyers and influencers. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what actually drives vendor choice, plus an AI follow-up that unpacks the reasoning behind recommendation scores. Built to run quarterly for longitudinal tracking.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your perspective on vendors in this space. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right or wrong answers — your honest impressions are what matter. About 6-7 minutes.

Q02
단문형필수

When you think of providers of (Replace with your product/service category), which brands come to mind? List as many as you can, in the order they occur to you.

Q03
객관식필수

Which of the following brands have you heard of, even if you know little about them? (Template note: replace with your actual competitive set before launching.)

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Competitor A)
  • (Competitor B)
  • (Competitor C)
  • (Competitor D)
Q04
객관식필수

Which of these brands would you actively consider for an upcoming purchase or renewal decision?

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Competitor A)
  • (Competitor B)
  • (Competitor C)
  • (Competitor D)
Q05
의견 척도필수

How familiar are you with (Your Brand) specifically?

척도: 15
최소:Never heard of it before today최대:Know it very well
Q06
매트릭스필수

Thinking of (Your Brand), how much do you agree or disagree with each statement?

6개 행 × 6개 열
  • Is a credible, trustworthy provider
  • Understands the needs of businesses like mine
  • Offers innovative products or features
  • Is easy to do business with
  • Delivers strong value for the price
  • 외 1개
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree · Not sure / no opinion
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When choosing a vendor in this category, which of these factors matters most and which matters least to your decision?

  • Price and total cost of ownership
  • Product quality or feature depth
  • Customer support responsiveness
  • Brand reputation and reviews
  • Ease of implementation
  • Existing relationship or contract
  • Security and compliance credentials
  • Vendor's industry expertise
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend (Your Brand) to a peer or colleague facing a similar decision?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
객관식

Which brand does your organization primarily use or purchase from today for this category?

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Competitor A)
  • (Competitor B)
  • (Competitor C)
  • (Competitor D)
  • None currently / not applicable
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the recommendation score the respondent just gave for (Your Brand). If the score is 8 or higher, find out what specifically earned that confidence and whether it's tied to a recent experience or a general impression. If the score is 6 or lower, dig into what's holding them back, whether it relates to a specific unmet need from the vendor comparison factors, and what would need to change to move the score up. If they named a competitor as their primary vendor, ask what tipped the decision that way.

Q11
객관식

Roughly how many employees are at your organization?

  • 1-49
  • 50-249
  • 250-999
  • 1,000-4,999
  • 5,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which best describes your role in vendor or purchasing decisions for this category?

  • Final decision-maker
  • Strong influence, not final say
  • Some input
  • No involvement
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What industry best describes your organization?

  • Technology / Software
  • Financial Services
  • Healthcare
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail / Consumer Goods
  • Professional Services
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your perspective! Your responses feed into our quarterly brand tracking report, alongside industry peers, to help us understand where we're winning trust and where we need to improve.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines unaided and aided brand awareness with consideration and current-vendor-usage questions, so you see the full funnel from recognition to actual purchase in one instrument.
  • Includes a best-worst (MaxDiff) trade-off exercise to quantify what actually drives vendor choice, not just self-reported importance ratings.
  • Pairs a recommendation-likelihood scale with an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes the reasoning behind each score, surfacing the 'why' that static scales miss.
  • Captures firmographic and role-based segmentation (company size, purchasing role, industry) so results can be cut by buyer type, and is built to be refielded quarterly for longitudinal tracking.

Jotform

Brand Awareness Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready, fully customizable form template for measuring general brand awareness. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, geared toward quick deployment rather than B2B-specific competitive tracking. No named-competitor benchmarking or trade-off analysis is built in by default.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize via drag-and-drop builder
  • Quick to deploy for general brand awareness
  • Flexible for various industries and question types

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
  • No built-in trade-off (best-worst) methodology for driver prioritization
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how questions were designed

SurveyMonkey

Brand Awareness Questionnaire Template

A ready-to-field questionnaire template backed by SurveyMonkey's survey methodology expertise, covering standard awareness and perception metrics. It's a static question set intended for broad brand tracking rather than a B2B-tailored competitive-positioning instrument with trade-off analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Methodology-informed default question wording
  • Established survey platform with broad distribution options
  • Straightforward benchmarking against general awareness metrics

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into open-ended reasoning
  • No MaxDiff-style trade-off exercise for vendor-choice drivers
  • No transparent prompt-level methodology since it isn't AI-driven

SurveySparrow

Brand Perception Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template focused on brand perception, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to improve completion rates. It's still a fixed, static question flow rather than an adaptive interview, and isn't specifically structured for B2B buyer segmentation or named-competitor tracking.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style UI that can boost respondent engagement
  • Focused specifically on brand perception rather than generic awareness
  • Simple to launch as a standalone perception tracker

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI probing based on responses
  • No trade-off/MaxDiff exercise to prioritize purchase drivers
  • No B2B-specific role/firmographic segmentation built into the template

Typeform

Brand Awareness Survey Template

A visually polished, fielding-ready template built on Typeform's one-question-at-a-time format, good for general consumer-facing brand awareness. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but lacks B2B-specific competitive benchmarking, trade-off analysis, or deeper qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, engaging one-question-at-a-time format
  • Easy to brand and customize visually
  • Good for quick top-of-funnel awareness checks

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to explore respondent reasoning
  • No trade-off methodology for ranking vendor-choice drivers
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Marketing & Growth

Social Media Presence & Content Feedback Survey

Gathers feedback from your followers on which platforms they use, what content they value, and whether your social presence influences real purchase decisions. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific post or content type that stuck with them and why, going beyond generic 'I like your posts' answers.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

AI 답변과 챗봇 추천에서의 브랜드 발견 가능성

고객이 ChatGPT나 Gemini 같은 AI 도구에 추천을 요청할 때 경쟁사 대비 자사 브랜드를 얼마나 자주, 얼마나 호의적으로 접하는지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 질문을 통해 최근 AI 기반 검색 이면의 실제 프롬프트, 답변, 구매 결정을 재구성합니다.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Mobile App Store Rating Drivers Study

Identifies what actually pushes users toward 5-star versus 1-star app store reviews — crashes, speed, ads, pricing, support — and what specifically would change their rating. Built for product and growth teams; the AI follow-up reconstructs the real incident behind each respondent's rating instead of generic complaints.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Email Newsletter Reader Engagement Survey

Measures whether subscribers actually open, skim, or read your newsletter, what content keeps them subscribed, their ideal send frequency, and what pushes them toward unsubscribing. The AI follow-up digs into the real moment a reader almost unsubscribed, not just the stated reason.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

로고 및 시각적 아이덴티티 인식 설문조사

일련의 로고 또는 시각적 아이덴티티 옵션이 인지도, 브랜드 적합성, 감정적 톤, 그리고 일대일 선호도 측면에서 어떻게 평가받는지 테스트합니다. 로고 후보군을 비교하거나 리디자인을 평가하는 브랜드 및 마케팅 팀을 위해 제작되었으며, 단순히 순위를 기록하는 것을 넘어 우승 선택을 이끈 구체적인 시각적 단서를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Design & Creative Feedback Review

Structured stakeholder or customer feedback on a design, mockup, or creative asset: first impressions, a click on what draws attention, ratings against the brief, and file upload for marked-up versions. The AI interviewer converts 'I just don't like it' into usable direction.

템플릿 보기