Broker Partner Experience & Satisfaction Survey
Captures how brokers experience working with your carrier, MGA, or brokerage — quoting speed, commissions, support, and technology — for teams managing broker partnerships. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reason behind a broker's lowest rating or recommendation score, surfacing the friction that's actually costing you placed business.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How long have you been placing business with us as a broker partner?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience working with us as a partner?
Rate us on each of the following aspects of working together.
- Speed of quote and underwriting turnaround
- Underwriting flexibility on non-standard risks
- Commission competitiveness
- Responsiveness of your dedicated support or underwriting contact
- Ease of use of the broker portal or technology
- 외 2개
In the last 3 months, roughly what share of your eligible business did you place with us versus competitors?
- None of it
- Less than a quarter
- About half
- Most of it
- All of it
Which of the following changes would do the most — and least — to increase the amount of business you place with us?
- Faster quote and underwriting turnaround
- Higher or more competitive commissions
- An easier-to-use broker portal or technology
- More marketing and co-branding support
- A dedicated, consistent underwriting contact
- Clearer communication about product or policy changes
- More training and product education
- Faster, more transparent claims handling
How likely are you to recommend us as a carrier or platform partner to another broker?
Identify the respondent's lowest-rated aspect from the ratings battery (or, if their recommendation score was 6 or below, treat that as the anchor) and get them to walk through a specific recent example: what happened, what they expected instead, and how it affected a real placement decision. If everything was rated highly, probe what would need to break for them to move business to a competitor, and confirm which single change from their priority ranking would matter most and why.
Is there anything else about your experience working with us that we should know?
What is the size of your brokerage?
- Independent/solo broker
- 2-10 brokers
- 11-50 brokers
- 51-200 brokers
- 200+ brokers
- Prefer not to say
What is your primary line of business?
- Personal lines (auto, home)
- Commercial property & casualty
- Life and health
- Employee benefits
- Specialty/surplus lines
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to our broker partnerships team and helps shape what we improve next.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Beyond a static ratings battery, an AI follow-up interview automatically digs into the specific reason behind a broker's lowest-rated aspect or lowest recommendation score, surfacing the friction actually costing you placed business — no static form does this.
- The template combines quoting speed, commissions, support, and technology ratings in one matrix alongside a MaxDiff prioritization question, so you learn not just what's wrong but what change would move the needle most.
- It closes with an open long-text field and firmographic questions (brokerage size, line of business, tenure, share of eligible business placed), giving you segment-ready context for every response.
- Reports are auto-generated from the responses and AI follow-up transcripts, with transparent prompts, so your broker partnership team can act on findings without manually reading every transcript.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Biopsychosocial Assessment for Clinical Intake
A structured intake tool for clinicians, counselors, and case managers that maps a client's physical health, mood and coping patterns, and social/environmental context into one whole-person profile. An AI follow-up interview explores the client's self-identified top stressor in their own words, surfacing how biological, psychological, and social factors interact in daily life.
템플릿 보기활동 및 세션 평가 설문조사
워크숍, 교육, 리트리트, 팀 활동 등을 위한 유연한 피드백 설문조사입니다. 참석 여부, 진행자 품질, 내용의 관련성, 추천 의향을 다루며, 각 추천 점수 뒤에 있는 구체적인 순간을 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 포함하여 주최자가 무엇을 고치고 무엇을 반복해야 할지 정확히 알 수 있도록 합니다.
템플릿 보기The Proust Questionnaire: Team Personality Profile
A modernized version of the classic Proust Questionnaire — used by media teams, HR and culture leads, and creative agencies to build candid personality profiles for onboarding pages, podcast intros, or team retrospectives. Closed questions capture the classic prompts verbatim; the AI follow-up interview digs into whichever answer sounds most emotionally loaded to surface the real story behind it.
템플릿 보기신규 상담 내담자 심리 초기 평가
치료 및 상담 진료의 첫 회기 전 초기 접수 절차로, 호소 문제, 증상 빈도, 일상생활에 미치는 영향, 치료 이력, 그리고 상담 목표를 다룹니다. AI 후속 면담은 내담자의 주요 고민 이면의 이야기 — 최근 무엇이 달라졌는지, 무엇을 시도해 보았는지, 좋은 결과란 어떤 모습인지 — 를 탐색하여, 임상가가 첫 회기에 이미 방향을 잡은 상태로 임할 수 있도록 돕습니다.
템플릿 보기Reader Book Review & Reaction Survey
Captures a reader's honest reaction to a specific book — pacing, characters, writing quality, and overall satisfaction — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment or decision that actually shaped their rating. Built for publishers, authors, and book clubs who want more than a star rating.
템플릿 보기Patient Experience of Nursing Care Assessment
Captures how patients or clients experienced the nursing care they received — communication, responsiveness, pain management, and discharge preparation — for hospitals, clinics, and home health teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment that most shaped their overall rating, surfacing concrete coaching moments beyond a satisfaction score.
템플릿 보기