Cross-Locale Format Interpretation & Preference Survey
Measures how users across world regions interpret and prefer date, time, number, and currency display formats, providing product and UX teams with actionable localization insights to reduce ambiguity and formatting errors.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 30 days, where did you most often read or enter dates?
- Work tools or productivity apps
- Government or finance portals
- Shopping and e-commerce
- Travel and booking
- Messaging or social apps
- News or media sites
- Other
If you saw 03/04/2025 on a website, which date would you assume it represents?
- 3 April 2025
- April 3, 2025
- 4 March 2025
- March 4, 2025
- Not sure
Rank these number formats from clearest (top) to least clear (bottom) when reading prices or large amounts.
- 1,234.56 (comma thousands, dot decimal)
- 1.234,56 (dot thousands, comma decimal)
- 1 234,56 (space thousands, comma decimal)
- 1234.56 (no thousands separator)
Which day do you prefer as the first day of the week on calendars?
- Monday
- Sunday
- Saturday
- No preference
Please describe a recent situation where a date, time, number, or currency format caused you confusion or led to an error.
Which region best describes where you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses have been recorded and will help improve how dates, times, numbers, and currencies are displayed across regions and products.
In the past 30 days, how often were you unsure about a date format you encountered?
Rank these date formats from clearest (top) to least clear (bottom).
- YYYY-MM-DD (e.g., 2025-03-12)
- DD/MM/YYYY (e.g., 12/03/2025)
- MM/DD/YYYY (e.g., 03/12/2025)
- DD Mon YYYY (e.g., 12 Mar 2025)
Which currency display format is clearest to you?
- $1,234.56
- 1,234.56 USD
- USD 1,234.56
- 1 234,56 $
- It depends on context
Rank the following areas from most in need of clarity improvements (top) to least (bottom).
- Dates
- Times
- Numbers
- Currencies
- Calendar settings
We'd like to explore your experiences with format confusion a bit further. Please share what happened and how it affected you.
Which language do you most prefer for digital interfaces?
- English
- Spanish
- Mandarin Chinese
- Hindi
- Arabic
- French
- Portuguese
- German
- Japanese
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Which time format do you prefer when reading times?
- 24-hour (e.g., 16:30)
- 12-hour with am/pm (e.g., 4:30 pm)
- Either is fine
- It depends on context
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about how dates, times, numbers, or currencies could be displayed more clearly?
Which device do you use most often for browsing or apps?
- Smartphone
- Laptop or desktop
- Tablet
- Other
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Includes multiple-choice and ranking questions that directly test interpretation of specific date, time, number, and currency formats (e.g., what 03/04/2025 means, ranking format clarity)
- Combines quantitative format-preference questions with an open-text prompt asking respondents to describe a real situation where a format caused confusion
- Adds an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes deeper into reported format-confusion experiences, going beyond fixed-choice answers
- Captures region, language, and device demographics alongside format questions so results can be segmented by locale for localization decisions
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Integration Partner Prioritization & Switching Cost Assessment
Helps product and platform teams rank integration partners by business impact, quantify switching costs, and identify the biggest blockers to partner changes. Designed for integration decision-makers and technical stakeholders.
템플릿 보기App Notification Preferences & Controls Study
Captures user preferences for notification channels, frequency, granularity, default settings, and control tools across apps and devices. Designed for product teams seeking to optimize notification strategies, improve opt-in rates, and reduce notification-driven churn.
템플릿 보기기능 폐지 위험 및 마이그레이션 준비도 설문
제품 기능을 폐지하기 전에 사용자 의존도, 대체 방안 패턴, 전환 준비 상태를 평가합니다. 데이터 기반의 폐지 여부(go/no-go) 결정을 내리는 제품팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Product Feature Impact & Priority Survey
Collects structured customer input on feature preferences scored by impact, urgency, and usage frequency to inform product roadmap prioritization decisions.
템플릿 보기Staged Feature Rollout Experience Survey
Measures user perceptions of progressive feature releases across clarity, control, communication, and confidence. Designed for product teams seeking to optimize rollout processes and communication strategies.
템플릿 보기Error Message Clarity & Resolution UX Survey
Evaluates user comprehension, actionability, and satisfaction with error messages and troubleshooting flows. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to improve in-app error guidance based on recent user incidents within 30 days.
템플릿 보기