모든 템플릿
Education & Academic

Employer Internship Program Evaluation Survey

Collects structured employer feedback on intern performance, program structure, supervision investment, and organizational outcomes to guide internship program improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 25개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Employer Internship Program Evaluation. This survey asks about internships your organization hosted in the past 12 months. Your responses will help improve future internship programs. • Participation is voluntary—you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers; we value your honest perspective. • All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 8–10 minutes. By continuing, you consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

Did your organization host at least one intern in the past 12 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
드롭다운

How many interns did your organization host in the past 12 months?

  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q04
평점 척도

Overall, how would you rate the performance of your intern(s)?

범위: 15
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q05
드롭다운

On average, how many hours per week did your team spend supervising each intern?

  • Less than 1 hour
  • 1–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • More than 15 hours
Q06
객관식

Did any of your intern(s) receive a return offer?

  • Yes, full-time offer
  • Yes, extended internship
  • No
  • Not applicable
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share your thoughts on how the internship program could be improved. Feel free to discuss any skill gaps you observed, structural changes you would recommend, or anything else you think is relevant.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your organization's primary industry?

  • Technology
  • Professional services
  • Manufacturing
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Nonprofit
  • Government
  • Finance/Insurance
  • Retail
  • Other
Q09
드롭다운

How many years of experience do you have supervising interns?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q10
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future internship programs.

Q11
드롭다운

What is your role in relation to the internship program?

  • Direct supervisor
  • Team lead/Manager
  • HR/Recruiting
  • Program coordinator
  • Executive
  • Other
Q12
드롭다운

What was the typical duration of an internship at your organization?

  • Less than 4 weeks
  • 4–6 weeks
  • 7–10 weeks
  • 11–14 weeks
  • 15–26 weeks
  • More than 26 weeks
Q13
의견 척도

How would you rate your intern(s) on technical and job-specific skills?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Outstanding
Q14
객관식

Which of the following program elements did you use with interns? Select all that apply.

  • Orientation session
  • Assigned mentor
  • Training workshops
  • Regular check-ins
  • Midpoint review
  • Final presentation
  • Social/networking events
  • Written performance evaluation
  • Other
Q15
의견 척도

Overall, what was the impact of the internship program on your organization?

척도: 17
최소:Very negative최대:Very positive
Q16
드롭다운

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–500
  • 501–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q17
객관식

Which work arrangements did your interns use? Select all that apply.

  • In-person
  • Remote
  • Hybrid
  • Varied by intern
  • Other
Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate your intern(s) on communication skills?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Outstanding
Q19
순위 매기기

Please rank the following activities by how much time your interns typically spent on each, from most time to least time.

  1. Project/assignment work
  2. Training and skill development
  3. Meetings and collaboration
  4. Shadowing and observation
  5. Administrative tasks
  6. Networking and social activities
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q20
의견 척도

How likely is your organization to host interns again in the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q21
드롭다운

Where is your organization primarily located?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • European Union
  • India
  • Australia/New Zealand
  • Other
Q22
의견 척도

How would you rate your intern(s) on initiative and self-direction?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Outstanding
Q23
드롭다운

Which best describes your organization type?

  • Private company
  • Public company
  • Startup
  • Nonprofit
  • Government
  • Other
Q24
의견 척도

How would you rate your intern(s) on professionalism and reliability?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Outstanding
Q25
의견 척도

How prepared were the intern(s) for their assigned tasks at the start of the internship?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all prepared최대:Very well prepared

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured employer inputs (program duration, work arrangement, supervision hours, program elements) with multi-dimensional intern performance ratings across technical skill, communication, initiative, and professionalism
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks tailored questions based on the employer's own earlier answers, rather than relying only on static open-text boxes
  • Captures organizational outcomes directly tied to program ROI, such as return offers, overall program impact, and likelihood to host interns again
  • Segments respondents by industry, organization size, location, and supervisor experience, enabling benchmarking that a single generic form can't support

Jotform

Bible College Camp Internship Evaluation Form Template

This is a static, fielding-ready form built for a very specific use case: evaluating camp-ministry interns at a Bible college, not general corporate internship programs. It's a good example of Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder but the content (fields, tone, scope) would need heavy rework for an employer-side business evaluation.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form builder with easy customization
  • Part of a large Jotform template library with related evaluation forms
  • Likely supports basic conditional logic and integrations with other Jotform tools

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up or probing based on prior answers
  • No voice-based interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
  • Built for a niche academic/ministry context, not general employer internship program evaluation

SurveySparrow

Summer Internship Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready template aimed at evaluating summer interns, likely from an education or mentor perspective rather than a full employer-side operational review. It covers general performance ratings but appears lighter on program-structure and organizational-outcome questions.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, mobile-friendly survey format that SurveySparrow is known for
  • Ready to deploy without building from scratch
  • Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for intern performance

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe vague or interesting responses
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task options
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

자주 묻는 질문

“Employer Internship Program Evaluation Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 25개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the Employer Internship Program Evaluation. This survey asks about internships your organization hosted in t…” · “Did your organization host at least one intern in the past 12 months?” · “How many interns did your organization host in the past 12 months?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 25개를 약 11분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Education & Academic

Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment

A pre-study instrument that verifies participants' understanding of consent information, risks, and withdrawal rights. Designed for IRB compliance and suitable for any human subjects research protocol.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Intern Feedback and Program Effectiveness Survey

Captures how interns experienced onboarding, mentorship, meaningful work, and team culture, then has them trade off which parts of the program mattered most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind their overall rating. Built for HR and program leads assessing internship ROI and full-time conversion potential.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Student Internship Support & Learning Outcomes Survey

Measures the quality of institutional internship support, supervision quality, and skill development outcomes to guide program improvement for higher education administrators and career services teams.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Internship Application Candidate Experience Survey

Captures how candidates experienced your internship application process — from finding the posting through interviews and final decision — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that made the experience feel smooth or frustrating. Built for HR and university recruiting teams who want to fix funnel drop-off before it costs them strong candidates.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Volunteer Experience & Program Evaluation Survey

Assesses how volunteers experience training, communication, recognition, and support, and how likely they are to keep volunteering or recommend the program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific experience behind their satisfaction score so program staff know exactly what to fix or protect.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey

A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.

템플릿 보기