모든 템플릿
Marketing & Growth

Marketing Claims and Messaging Testing Survey

Tests how believable, relevant, and differentiating your candidate marketing claims are, using a best-worst trade-off to force priority among competing lines and an AI follow-up that digs into why the top claim landed or fell flat. Built for brand, product marketing, and comms teams validating messaging before a campaign launch.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for joining! We're testing a few different ways of describing our product and want your honest reactions — there are no right answers. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
텍스트 하이라이트

Read the claim below and highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you, whether positive or negative.

(Replace with candidate claim 1, e.g. 'The only planner that adapts to your day in real time.') (Template note: replace with your own claim text before launching.)

Q03
의견 척도필수

How believable is this claim?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all believable최대:Extremely believable
Q04
의견 척도필수

How relevant is this claim to your own needs?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all relevant최대:Extremely relevant
Q05
메시지

Now here's a second version of the claim, describing the same product a different way.

Q06
텍스트 하이라이트

Again, highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you.

(Replace with candidate claim 2, e.g. 'Finally, a planner smart enough to keep up with you.') (Template note: replace with your own claim text before launching.)

Q07
의견 척도필수

How believable is this second claim?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all believable최대:Extremely believable
Q08
의견 척도필수

How relevant is this second claim to your own needs?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all relevant최대:Extremely relevant
Q09
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Across all the claims you've seen (plus a few more), which best describe what makes this product worth choosing, and which fall flattest?

  • (Replace with claim A)
  • (Replace with claim B)
  • (Replace with claim C)
  • (Replace with claim D)
  • (Replace with claim E)
  • (Replace with claim F)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most convincing최악:Least convincing
Q10
객관식필수

Which single claim would most make you want to learn more about this product?

  • (Replace with claim A)
  • (Replace with claim B)
  • (Replace with claim C)
  • (Replace with claim D)
Q11
객관식

Does any claim you saw feel exaggerated, confusing, or hard to trust?

  • (Replace with claim A)
  • (Replace with claim B)
  • (Replace with claim C)
  • (Replace with claim D)
Q12
AI 인터뷰

Focus on the claim the respondent picked as most convincing (or flagged as confusing/exaggerated). Ask them to put in their own words what they think the claim is actually promising, whether they'd expect the product to deliver on it, and what proof or detail would make them trust it more. If they flagged a claim as exaggerated, probe exactly which word or phrase triggered that reaction and whether a softer version would still be compelling.

Q13
의견 척도필수

Based on everything you read, how likely would you be to consider this product?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q14
객관식

Which age range are you in?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your reactions will directly shape which claims we keep, revise, or drop before launch.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a best-worst max-diff exercise that forces respondents to prioritize among multiple competing claims rather than rating each in isolation
  • Pairs believability and relevance opinion-scale ratings for each claim with a highlight task to see exactly which words or phrases land
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes why the respondent's top-picked (or most confusing) claim worked or didn't, going beyond static rating data
  • Ends with an automated report and transparent prompts, so marketing and comms teams can see both the scores and the reasoning behind them before a campaign launch

SurveyMonkey

Messaging/claims Testing Survey Template

This is a direct, fielding-ready template for testing marketing claims and messaging, matching QuestionPunk's use case closely. It's a static questionnaire built around rating scales and closed-ended items rather than adaptive dialogue. SurveyMonkey's broad panel and analytics ecosystem make it a natural point of comparison.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built specifically for claims/messaging testing, not a generic survey
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
  • Likely includes standard rating and ranking question types suited to messaging comparisons

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to ask respondents why a claim landed or fell flat
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Product Concept Testing Survey Template

This template targets concept testing broadly rather than claims/messaging trade-off testing specifically, so it's adjacent rather than a like-for-like match. It's a static, conversational-style form rather than a true adaptive interview. Useful for teams validating a product concept, but not built around forced-choice claim prioritization.

잘하는 점

  • Typeform's conversational UI format tends to feel more engaging than plain grid surveys
  • Good for early-stage concept reactions rather than fine-grained claim comparison
  • Easy to customize visually for brand-consistent fielding

아쉬운 점

  • No best-worst/max-diff mechanism to force priority among competing claims
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to dig into open-ended reactions
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Marketing & Growth

Social Media Content Consent & Comfort Survey

Explores how comfortable customers are when brands reshare their photos, tags, reviews, or comments in marketing — and what would make them more willing to say yes. Built for marketing, social, and legal teams shaping user-generated-content and permission policies, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment someone felt uneasy or declined.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Parent Perspectives on Child Email Usage & Safety

Explores how parents currently manage their child's email account — what it's used for, what worries them most, and which safety features they'd actually value. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind a recent scare or close call, surfacing details a checklist question can't capture. Built for teams designing kid-safe email or parental-control products.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Brand Pulse: Attribute Perception Tracker

Tracks how your brand is perceived on key attributes like trust, quality, and value, and identifies which of those attributes actually drive choice through a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind the respondent's lowest-rated attribute. Built for brand and marketing teams running recurring pulse checks.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Newsletter Content & Engagement Feedback Survey

Measures how subscribers actually read and value your newsletter — open habits, section-by-section ratings, and content priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific reasons behind promoter or detractor scores instead of generic satisfaction talk. Built for newsletter editors, content marketers, and community teams refining a recurring send.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

B2B Brand Awareness and Perception Tracker

Tracks unaided and aided awareness, consideration, and perceived positioning of your brand versus named competitors among B2B buyers and influencers. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what actually drives vendor choice, plus an AI follow-up that unpacks the reasoning behind recommendation scores. Built to run quarterly for longitudinal tracking.

템플릿 보기
Marketing & Growth

Email Newsletter Reader Engagement Survey

Measures whether subscribers actually open, skim, or read your newsletter, what content keeps them subscribed, their ideal send frequency, and what pushes them toward unsubscribing. The AI follow-up digs into the real moment a reader almost unsubscribed, not just the stated reason.

템플릿 보기