모든 템플릿
Nonprofit & Civic

Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey

Measures resident satisfaction with local park amenities, safety, and programming to help municipal parks departments prioritize improvements and track service quality over time.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the City Parks Resident Survey. This survey asks about your experiences with local parks, including amenities, safety, and programs. Your responses will help guide park improvement decisions. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest opinions. • All responses are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 10 minutes. By continuing, you agree to participate.

Q02
드롭다운

In the past 12 months, how often did you visit a city park?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • About once a month
  • A few times a year
  • Not in the last 12 months
Q03
객관식

Which of the following park amenities have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Playgrounds
  • Athletic fields or courts
  • Walking or running trails
  • Dog area
  • Restrooms
  • Picnic areas or shelters
  • Drinking fountains
  • Lighting
  • Outdoor fitness equipment
  • Community garden
  • None of these
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the city parks in your area?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q05
의견 척도

Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during daytime visits to the park you use most?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q06
드롭다운

In the past 12 months, approximately how many city-led programs or events in parks did you attend?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6 or more
  • Not sure
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience with city parks? Please share your thoughts and we may ask a follow-up question.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform city park improvement priorities. Results will be shared publicly on the city parks website.

Q10
객관식

What is your primary way of getting to the park you visit most often?

  • Walk
  • Bike or scooter
  • Personal car
  • Public transit
  • Mobility device (wheelchair, etc.)
  • Ride-hail or taxi
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate the physical condition and maintenance of the park amenities you have used?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor condition최대:Excellent condition
Q12
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend the city parks in your area to a friend, family member, or neighbor?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q13
의견 척도

Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during evening or nighttime visits to the park you use most? If you have not visited at night, select 'Not applicable.'

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q14
객관식

Which types of programs would you like to see more of in city parks? Select all that apply.

  • Fitness or wellness classes
  • Youth sports
  • Arts, music, or movies in the park
  • Nature or environmental education
  • Senior-focused activities
  • Volunteer days or clean-ups
  • Cultural festivals
  • Adaptive or inclusive programs
  • Family-friendly activities
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
순위 매기기

Please rank the following potential improvements in order of priority to you, with the most important first.

  1. Restroom upgrades
  2. Trail maintenance and repair
  3. More shade and trees
  4. Lighting improvements
  5. Playground upgrades
  6. Seating and picnic areas
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q17
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you experienced or observed any of the following safety concerns in a city park? Select all that apply.

  • Poor lighting
  • Isolated areas with limited visibility
  • Traffic speed near park entrances
  • Aggressive behavior or harassment
  • Off-leash dogs in leash-required areas
  • Vandalism or litter
  • Lack of staff or ranger presence
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
객관식

How would you prefer to receive information about park programs, closures, and updates? Select all that apply.

  • City website
  • Email newsletter
  • Social media
  • Text or SMS alerts
  • Signs posted in the park
  • Community bulletin boards
  • Local news outlets
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
장문형

What is your neighborhood or ZIP/postal code?

Q20
객관식

Do you have any children under 18 living in your household?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
드롭다운

How long have you lived in this city or area?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–9 years
  • 10 or more years
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school diploma or GED
  • Some college or trade school
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes each resident's single most important requested change, going beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Covers both daytime and evening/nighttime safety perception separately, plus a dedicated question on observed safety incidents
  • Combines a ranking exercise for improvement priorities with satisfaction, likelihood-to-recommend, and program-preference questions in one flow
  • Captures demographic and neighborhood context (age, household composition, tenure, ZIP/neighborhood) to let parks departments segment results by area

SurveyMonkey

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

A general-purpose resident satisfaction template covering municipal services broadly rather than parks-specific amenities, safety, or programming. It's a static fielding-ready form suitable as a starting point but would need substantial customization to match park-specific topics like amenity usage or evening safety. SurveyMonkey's brand recognition and analytics dashboard are notable strengths.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, easy-to-use survey builder with broad respondent familiarity
  • Built-in analytics and benchmarking tools typical of SurveyMonkey
  • Ready-to-use template structure for quick deployment

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended feedback
  • Likely lacks parks-specific safety and amenity-usage questions out of the box
  • No published methodology on question design or scoring logic

SurveySparrow

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

A general community/resident satisfaction template rather than one tailored to parks amenities, safety, or programming specifics. It offers a conversational chat-style UI, which improves completion rates, but relies on static predefined questions rather than adaptive interviewing. Useful as a broad resident feedback starting point, not a parks-specific instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that can feel more engaging than static forms
  • Mobile-friendly template design
  • Quick to deploy for general resident feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
  • Not parks-specific, so likely missing amenity, safety, and programming detail out of the box
  • No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published

자주 묻는 질문

“Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 22개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the City Parks Resident Survey. This survey asks about your experiences with local parks, including amenities…” · “In the past 12 months, how often did you visit a city park?” · “Which of the following park amenities have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 22개를 약 10분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Library Patron Experience: Discovery, Holds & Digital Services

Measures patron satisfaction and friction points across material discovery, hold management, and digital resource usage to prioritize service improvements for public libraries.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

동네 행사 참여 및 만족도 설문조사

주민들이 블록 파티, 마켓, 축제와 같은 동네 행사를 어떻게 알게 되고, 참석하며, 평가하는지, 그리고 무엇이 있으면 더 자주 참여하게 될지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 단순한 숫자에 그치지 않고 만족도 점수와 참석 장벽 뒤에 숨은 실제 이유를 깊이 파고듭니다.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

어린이집·보육 서비스 학부모 만족도 조사

부모가 자녀의 안전에 대해 얼마나 안심하는지, 시설이 일상적인 소통을 얼마나 잘하는지, 교직원이 아이들에게 얼마나 따뜻하게 대하는지, 발달 활동이 연령에 적절하다고 느끼는지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 질문은 낮은 안전 또는 소통 점수 뒤에 있는 구체적인 사건이나 부족한 부분을 파고들어, 점수만으로는 놓칠 수 있는 세부 사항을 드러냅니다.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

도서관 이용자 만족도 및 개선 설문조사

이용자가 도서관의 장서, 직원, 공간, 디지털 자료를 어떻게 평가하는지, 그리고 어떤 개선이 가장 중요한지를 측정하며, 만족도 점수 이면의 실제 이야기를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다. 예산, 운영 시간, 리모델링을 계획 중인 공공 및 대학 도서관을 위해 제작되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Neighborhood Livability and Community Feedback Survey

Captures how residents really feel about safety, upkeep, amenities, and community spirit where they live, with an AI follow-up that digs into the one issue affecting quality of life most. Built for city planners, HOAs, and community organizations tracking neighborhood health over time.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Parent Satisfaction & School Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied parents are with their child's school across communication, safety, academics, and responsiveness — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment or interaction driving each parent's overall recommendation score. Built for school administrators and PTA leaders who want more than a satisfaction number.

템플릿 보기