모든 템플릿
Sample Templates

Post-Event Sponsor Engagement & Lead Quality Assessment

Measures attendee engagement with event sponsors, lead quality signals, and perceived sponsor value to help event organizers and sponsors evaluate and optimize sponsorship ROI.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for attending! This brief survey asks about your experience with sponsors at this event. Your responses are voluntary, confidential, and will be reported only in aggregate to help improve future events. There are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest impressions. The survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. You may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following sponsor activities did you participate in during this event? Select all that apply.

  • Visited a sponsor booth in the expo
  • Attended a sponsor-led talk or demo
  • Had a one-on-one conversation with a sponsor representative
  • Downloaded or scanned sponsor content
  • Entered a sponsor contest or giveaway
  • Did not engage with any sponsor activities
Q03
의견 척도

How relevant were the sponsors you engaged with to your professional needs?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all relevant최대:Extremely relevant
Q04
의견 척도

How valuable was the sponsor presence to your overall event experience?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all valuable최대:Extremely valuable
Q05
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, what stood out most—positively or negatively—about your experience with sponsors at this event?

Q06
객관식

Which best describes your role in technology or solution purchase decisions?

  • Final decision maker
  • Part of a buying committee
  • Recommender or influencer
  • Evaluator or researcher
  • End user only
  • Not involved
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지

Thank you for your time. Your feedback will help improve sponsor experiences at future events.

Q08
드롭다운

Approximately how many different sponsor organizations did you have a conversation or exchange contact information with at this event?

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10
Q09
객관식

After engaging with sponsors at this event, which best describes your current purchase intent?

  • No intent to purchase
  • Exploring possibilities (12+ months)
  • May shortlist within 6–12 months
  • Likely to purchase within 1–3 months
  • Already purchased during or after the event
  • Not applicable
Q10
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this event's sponsor interactions to a colleague?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q11
장문형

What could sponsors do differently at future events to deliver more value to you?

Q12
드롭다운

How many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
의견 척도

Overall, how would you describe the depth of your conversations with sponsors at this event?

척도: 17
최소:Very superficial최대:Very in-depth
Q14
객관식

Did you share your contact details with any sponsors at this event?

  • Yes, with 1 sponsor
  • Yes, with 2–3 sponsors
  • Yes, with 4 or more sponsors
  • Not sure
  • No
Q15
순위 매기기

Rank the following drivers of sponsor value at this event from most to least important.

  1. Lead quantity generated
  2. Lead quality and fit
  3. Brand awareness and exposure
  4. Quality of conversations and meetings
  5. Pipeline acceleration or sales impact
  6. Partnerships or channel opportunities
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q16
드롭다운

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Technology
  • Healthcare
  • Financial services
  • Manufacturing
  • Education
  • Government
  • Nonprofit
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
의견 척도

How knowledgeable were the sponsor representatives you spoke with about their products or solutions?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all knowledgeable최대:Extremely knowledgeable
Q18
객관식

Did you schedule any follow-up meetings or demos with sponsors?

  • Yes, multiple
  • Yes, one
  • Not yet, but I plan to
  • No
Q19
드롭다운

In which region is your organization primarily based?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

How professional and well-organized were the sponsor booth experiences?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all professional최대:Extremely professional
Q21
의견 척도

If you received any follow-up communication from sponsors after the event, how timely was it?

척도: 17
최소:Very slow최대:Very prompt
Q22
의견 척도

If you received follow-up communication from sponsors, how relevant was it to your interests or needs?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all relevant최대:Extremely relevant

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Sample Templates

Site Search, Navigation & Filter UX Evaluation

Measures ease of finding content, filter effectiveness, and result relevance across a site or app to diagnose UX friction and prioritize improvements that lift task completion and satisfaction.

템플릿 보기
Sample Templates

Restaurant Allergen Safety & Trust Survey

Measures diners' confidence in restaurant allergen communication, cross-contact prevention, and safety practices. Designed for consumers who manage food allergies or dine with someone who does.

템플릿 보기
Sample Templates

추천 프로그램 마찰 및 장벽 점검

현재 및 이전 고객을 대상으로 인지도, 인센티브 매력도, 프로세스상의 마찰을 측정하여 추천 이탈을 진단하고, 프로그램 전환율을 높이기 위해 가장 큰 영향을 미칠 개선점을 파악합니다.

템플릿 보기
Sample Templates

Resident Impact Assessment: Micro-Fulfillment Centers

Measures how nearby micro-fulfillment center operations affect residents' quality of life, local environment, and policy preferences. Designed for city planners and community boards seeking structured resident input to guide zoning and operational decisions.

템플릿 보기
Sample Templates

순환형 리테일 프로그램 수요 및 태도 조사

트레이드인, 회수, 수리, 리퍼 제품 재판매 등 리테일러 주도의 순환형 프로그램에 대한 쇼핑객의 인지도, 행동 의향, 선호도를 측정하여 프로그램 설계 및 시장 진입 전략에 반영하기 위한 조사입니다.

템플릿 보기
Sample Templates

RAG System Quality & Grounding Assessment (Developer Survey)

Evaluates developer experiences with Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems across retrieval quality, grounding accuracy, evaluation practices, and infrastructure. Designed for ML engineers, backend engineers, and data scientists actively building or maintaining RAG pipelines.

템플릿 보기