Procurement Request & Approval Cycle Assessment
Diagnoses bottlenecks, clarity gaps, and cycle-time issues across procurement request and approval workflows. Designed for internal operations teams seeking data-driven improvements to purchasing processes based on employee feedback.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How often do you typically submit or approve procurement requests?
- Daily
- Weekly
- Monthly
- Less than monthly
- Rarely/Never
In the past 30 days, how clear were the requirements for submitting a procurement request?
Which stages most often caused delays for you in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Gathering specifications or requirements
- Vendor selection/quotes
- Budget or finance review
- Compliance or legal review
- Manager/functional approval
- PO creation or system entry
- System or tool issues
- None/No delays
- Not applicable
Are there any instructions or guidelines you found unclear or difficult to locate? If so, please describe.
Which department or function best describes your role?
- Procurement
- Finance
- Legal/Compliance
- IT
- Engineering
- Marketing
- Sales
- Operations
- HR
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be used to identify and address bottlenecks in our procurement process. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
How many procurement requests did you submit in the past 90 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11 or more
In the past 30 days, how satisfied were you with the time it took from submission to final approval?
Rank the following improvements by how much they would speed up your procurement approvals (1 = greatest impact).
- Clearer request guidelines and examples
- Fewer approval layers
- Faster response SLAs from reviewers
- More intuitive submission tool
- Pre-approved vendor lists
- Proactive status notifications
We'd like to explore your procurement experience in a bit more detail. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions.
What is your seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Director or above
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how easy was it to find the documentation and guidelines needed to complete a procurement request?
What is your preferred channel for submitting procurement requests?
- Procurement portal
- Ticketing system
- Chat tool/assistant
- Other
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the procurement request and approval process.
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how responsive were the approvers or reviewers involved in your procurement requests?
Where is your primary work location?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how easy was the procurement submission tool or system to use?
In the past 30 days, approximately how many business days did a typical approval take from submission to completion?
- Less than 1 day
- 1–2 days
- 3–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–15 days
- More than 15 days
- Not sure
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines quantitative diagnostics (opinion-scale ratings on requirement clarity, approval speed, tool usability, and approver responsiveness) with a dedicated multiple-choice question isolating exactly which stages caused delays in the past 30 days.
- Includes a ranking question so respondents prioritize which fixes would most reduce cycle time, giving ops teams a data-driven improvement backlog rather than just satisfaction scores.
- Adds an AI follow-up interview segment that probes deeper into each respondent's procurement experience beyond fixed-choice answers, plus open-text fields for unclear guidelines and general feedback.
- Captures role, seniority, tenure, and location dropdowns so bottleneck patterns can be segmented by department or level, and closes with an auto-generated report workflow — none of which static request forms provide.
Jotform
Field Trip Approval Request Form TemplateThis is a static intake/approval form for school field trips, not a procurement process or a diagnostic survey — the domain and purpose differ substantially from a procurement bottleneck assessment. It's useful only as a reference point for how Jotform structures generic request-approval forms.
잘하는 점
- Drag-and-drop form builder with quick customization
- Mobile-friendly submission and approval routing
- Large template library for simple request/approval workflows
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — it's a fixed-field form
- Not built for cycle-time or clarity diagnostics, and has no procurement-specific content
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
SurveySparrow
Overtime Request Form TemplateThis template is designed for employee overtime requests, an HR workflow rather than procurement, so it's not directly comparable in subject matter, though it shares the general 'request/approval process' category. It appears to be a conversational-style static form rather than a bottleneck-diagnostic instrument.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-like survey UI for better completion rates
- Positioned within a broader employee-experience survey suite
- Supports multi-channel distribution
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option for deeper probing
- Not tailored to procurement stages, delays, or approval-cycle diagnostics
- No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation evident
Typeform
Employee Time Off Request Form TemplateA polished conversational form for time-off requests, again an HR use case rather than procurement approval-cycle diagnostics. It's a fielding-ready request form, not a process-assessment survey with cycle-time or delay-cause analysis.
잘하는 점
- Clean, on-brand conversational question flow
- Simple one-question-at-a-time UX known to reduce drop-off
- Easy embedding into existing employee portals
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into individual pain points
- No procurement-specific bottleneck, delay-stage, or ranking questions
- No built-in automated quality scoring or AI-generated diagnostic report
자주 묻는 질문
“Procurement Request & Approval Cycle Assessment” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 20개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the Procurement Request & Approval Process Survey. This survey asks about your recent experience submitting o…” · “How often do you typically submit or approve procurement requests?” · “In the past 30 days, how clear were the requirements for submitting a procurement request?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 20개를 약 9분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
M&A Integration Readiness Pulse Survey
A company-wide pulse survey assessing employee readiness for post-merger integration across culture alignment, process documentation, tooling access, and communication effectiveness. Designed for fielding in the weeks before or after a merger close to surface urgent gaps.
템플릿 보기SaaS Procurement Workflow Audit Survey
Evaluates the efficiency and pain points across SaaS request, approval, and renewal workflows. Designed for IT, procurement, finance, and operational stakeholders to identify bottlenecks and prioritize process improvements.
템플릿 보기Enterprise Procurement & Legal Review Mapping Survey
Maps the end-to-end enterprise buying journey — procurement steps, approval gates, legal/InfoSec blockers, and trust signals — to help sales, legal, and revenue teams reduce deal-cycle friction. Best suited for procurement, legal, and IT decision-makers at mid-to-large enterprises.
템플릿 보기Internal Purchase Request Dialog Experience Survey
Evaluates how employees experience the internal purchase/order dialog used to request equipment, supplies, or redeem benefits — surfacing where the flow is clear versus confusing. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the respondent's most recent request step by step to pinpoint exactly where hesitation or abandonment happened. Built for HR, IT, and procurement teams refining internal tools.
템플릿 보기Employee Online Purchasing Experience Survey
Explores how employees shop online for work needs — software, supplies, travel, equipment — and how smooth or frustrating the approval and procurement process feels. Includes an AI follow-up that reconstructs a recent purchase attempt step by step, surfacing friction points and workarounds that closed-ended questions miss. Built for HR and procurement teams evaluating purchasing tools and policy.
템플릿 보기Parts Request & Fulfillment Experience Survey
Measures how easily technicians, mechanics, and maintenance staff can request, track, and receive the right parts — covering speed, accuracy, availability communication, and channel preference. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the most recent problematic request to pinpoint exactly where the process breaks down. Built for parts suppliers, distributors, and internal procurement teams.
템플릿 보기