Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
Product Usability & User Experience Feedback Survey
Evaluates how easy, efficient, and satisfying your product or website is to use, combining attribute ratings and a prioritization exercise with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment of friction instead of relying on vague complaints. Built for product, design, and research teams running ongoing usability tracking.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
In the last 30 days, how often have you used (Replace with product/website name)?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times this month
- This is my first time
Q03
의견 척도필수
Thinking about the last time you tried to complete a task in the product, how easy was it to get done?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q04
평점 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience using the product?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q05
매트릭스필수
Rate each part of the experience below.
6개 행 × 5개 열
- Navigation and menus
- Visual design and layout
- Page or app load speed
- Search and findability
- Error messages and recovery
- 외 1개
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these issues most needs fixing, and which matters least right now?
- Confusing navigation
- Slow load or response times
- Unclear error messages
- Inconsistent design across screens
- Hard to find what I'm looking for
- Too many steps to complete a task
- Unclear labels or terminology
- Poor experience on mobile devices
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most needs fixing최악:Least needs fixing
Q07
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the respondent's most recent frustrating moment using the product: what were they trying to do, what actually happened step by step, and where exactly did it break down. Anchor on whichever attribute they rated lowest in the previous rating grid or picked as the top issue in the prioritization question, and ask what they did next (gave up, worked around it, asked for help). If they report no friction at all, probe what almost went wrong or what they'd change if forced to pick one thing.
Q08
텍스트 하이라이트
Below is a sample screen from the product. Highlight any words or phrases that felt confusing or unclear. (Template note: replace with your own interface copy or screen text before launching.)
Welcome back! To continue, please verify your account status by confirming your preferences in the settings panel, then proceed to finalize your session. (Template note: replace with your own X before…
Q09
장문형
If you could change one thing about the product to make it easier or more pleasant to use, what would it be and why?
Q10
객관식
Which device do you use most often to access the product?
- Desktop or laptop computer
- Smartphone
- Tablet
- Multiple devices equally
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your role or how you primarily use the product?
- Individual contributor
- Manager or team lead
- Administrator
- Customer or client
- Other
Q12
메시지
That's everything — thank you for the detailed feedback! Your ratings and comments go directly to our design and product teams to guide upcoming usability improvements.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond static ratings by including a max-diff prioritization exercise so teams know which usability issue to fix first, not just how satisfied users are
- Uses an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's actual most recent frustrating moment, replacing vague complaints with a concrete incident
- Includes a text-highlight exercise on a real product screen so respondents can mark the exact words or UI elements causing confusion
- Combines attribute-level matrix ratings, device and role screening, and an open-ended improvement question in one flow built for ongoing usability tracking, not a one-off form
Jotform
User Experience Survey Form TemplateA drag-and-drop, fielding-ready form template for collecting basic UX feedback. It's built on Jotform's general form platform, so it's easy to brand and embed but is a static questionnaire rather than an interview. Good for quick UX pulse checks, less suited to deep diagnostic research.
잘하는 점
- Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
- Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's form platform
- Simple, ready-to-use starting point for basic UX feedback
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual answers
- No mechanism to reconstruct a specific usability incident or moment of friction
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
QuestionPro
Mobile app user experience survey template | Voice of the customer surveysA fielding-ready template focused specifically on mobile app UX, positioned within QuestionPro's larger Voice of the Customer survey library. It benefits from QuestionPro's enterprise survey and analytics tooling but is scoped to mobile apps rather than general product/website usability. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than narrative.
잘하는 점
- Mobile-app-specific question framing
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics and dashboard tooling
- Part of a broader Voice of the Customer template library for cross-survey consistency
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific bad experience
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure
SurveySparrow
User Experience Survey & Questionnaire TemplateA fielding-ready, chat-style UX survey template that leans on SurveySparrow's conversational UI to feel less like a form. It's positioned under marketing templates, suggesting a broader customer-feedback use case rather than dedicated product/design research. The conversational format is scripted, not adaptive.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface that can improve completion rates
- Templated within SurveySparrow's marketing feedback suite for quick setup
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow surveys
아쉬운 점
- Conversational UI is pre-scripted, not adaptive AI probing based on the respondent's actual answers
- No capability to reconstruct a specific recent friction moment or highlight confusing UI text
- No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology published
Typeform
User Experience Survey FormA polished, fielding-ready UX survey template using Typeform's signature conversational, one-question-per-screen format. It's easy to customize visually and is well suited to lightweight feedback collection, but the flow is fixed once published. There's no research-specific tooling like task-based exercises or incident reconstruction.
잘하는 점
- Visually engaging, one-question-at-a-time format known to boost completion
- Simple to customize and brand within Typeform's editor
- Widely used and familiar format for respondents
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questions — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from responses
- No prioritization exercise, screen-highlight task, or AI-reconstructed friction narrative
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
Dance Audition Experience Feedback Survey
Captures how dancers experienced your audition process — from communication and choreography teaching to callback follow-up — so studios, companies, and choreographers can improve turnout and reputation. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind how results and feedback were (or weren't) communicated. Built for dance companies, casting directors, and studio owners running auditions.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Facial Treatment Client Intake & Skin Consultation
A pre-appointment intake for estheticians, spas, and skincare clinics that captures skin type, primary concerns, safety-relevant history (retinoids, recent peels, allergies), and treatment goals — with an AI follow-up that digs into the story behind the client's main concern so the esthetician walks in prepared, not guessing.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
온라인 면접 지원자 경험 설문조사
지원자가 화상 면접 과정을 어떻게 경험했는지 — 플랫폼 안정성, 면접관 태도, 커뮤니케이션의 명확성, 전반적 인상 — 를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 지원자의 평가를 형성한 구체적 순간을 심층적으로 탐구합니다. 원격 채용 파이프라인을 운영하는 인재 채용 및 HR 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Soccer Player Development & Performance Evaluation
A structured evaluation form for coaches, scouts, or player-development staff to rate a soccer player's technical, tactical, physical, and mental attributes, then prioritize development areas. The AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest development priority with a concrete recent-match example instead of a vague rating.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Business Performance & Health Evaluation Survey
A structured health check for evaluating how a business is performing across strategy, financials, operations, and team. Combines scored ratings, a prioritization exercise, and a budget allocation trade-off with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real root cause behind the weakest area. Built for owners, executives, and advisors running a periodic business review.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Workplace Language Proficiency Self-Assessment Survey
Assesses how employees or candidates actually use a target language on the job — across speaking, listening, reading, and writing — for HR, L&D, and global teams making staffing or training decisions, with an AI follow-up interview that stress-tests self-reported confidence against a real recent high-stakes work conversation.
템플릿 보기