모든 템플릿
Education & Academic

Remote Exam Fairness & Privacy Perceptions Survey

Measures student perceptions of fairness, privacy, and acceptability of proctoring practices in remote exams. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking to evaluate and improve remote assessment policies.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 25개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey about your experiences with remote exams. This survey explores your perceptions of fairness, privacy, and proctoring practices in remote assessments. It should take approximately 7–10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate to inform assessment policies. By continuing, you consent to participate in this study.

Q02
객관식

In the last 12 months, have you taken any remote exams (proctored or unproctored)?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
드롭다운

How many remote exams (including unproctored) did you complete in the last 12 months?

  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–6
  • 7 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q04
객관식

Which proctoring features were used in any of your remote exams? Select all that apply.

  • Webcam monitoring
  • Microphone/audio capture
  • Screen sharing or recording
  • Room scan (pan the camera)
  • Photo ID verification
  • Browser lockdown or site whitelist
  • Keystroke/typing analysis
  • Not sure / Don't remember
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, how fair did your remote exams feel compared with in-person exams?

척도: 17
최소:Much less fair최대:Much more fair
Q06
의견 척도

How intrusive did the proctoring feel during your remote exams?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all intrusive최대:Extremely intrusive
Q07
순위 매기기

Please rank the following aspects of remote exams from most important to least important to you.

  1. Fair grading accuracy
  2. Academic integrity (preventing cheating)
  3. Student privacy
  4. Accessibility and accommodations
  5. Technical reliability
  6. Clear communication from the provider
  7. Convenience/flexibility
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what changes would most improve fairness and privacy in remote exams?

Q09
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–29
  • 30–39
  • 40–49
  • 50 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses are confidential and will be used to improve remote exam policies. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

Q11
객관식

Which types of remote exams did you take in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Live human proctor via webcam
  • AI-automated proctoring
  • Unproctored (no proctor)
  • Open-book allowed
  • Not sure / Don't remember
Q12
의견 척도

The exam rules and expectations were clearly communicated before the exam.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
의견 척도

The exam provider clearly explained how my data would be stored and used.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q14
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand more about your experiences with fairness and privacy in remote exams. Please share your thoughts, and our AI moderator will ask a few follow-up questions.

Q15
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도

The exam format gave me a fair opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
의견 척도

I felt confident that my personal data was handled securely during the exam.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
드롭다운

Where do you primarily study?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

All students had equal access to the resources needed for the exam.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
순위 매기기

Rank these proctoring practices from most acceptable to least acceptable to you.

  1. Photo ID verification
  2. Webcam on during exam
  3. Screen sharing/recording
  4. Room scan
  5. Recording the entire session
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q21
드롭다운

What is your current highest level of education?

  • Secondary/High school
  • Vocational/Technical
  • Some college/Undergraduate in progress
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate/Professional (Master's/PhD/MD/etc.)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

The grading felt consistent and unbiased.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
객관식

What is your current enrollment status?

  • Full-time student
  • Part-time student
  • Not currently enrolled (completed within last 12 months)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

Compared with in-person settings, how prevalent do you believe cheating was in your remote exams?

척도: 17
최소:Much less prevalent최대:Much more prevalent
Q25
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study?

  • STEM (e.g., CS, Engineering, Math, Natural Sciences)
  • Social Sciences
  • Arts & Humanities
  • Business/Economics
  • Health & Medicine
  • Education
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built for remote exam contexts, not general remote learning — includes proctoring feature usage questions, ranked acceptability of specific proctoring practices, and opinion-scale items on fairness, clarity of rules, equal access, and grading consistency.
  • Dedicated privacy-trust items (data storage transparency, security confidence) alongside fairness items, letting institutions separate 'privacy concern' from 'fairness concern' in results.
  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview segment to probe open-ended reasoning behind fairness/privacy scores, something static question sets can't do.
  • Open-ended 'what would improve fairness' question plus demographic breakdowns (enrollment status, field of study, education level) support segmented, actionable reporting for institutional policy reviews.

QuestionPro

Remote learning survey questions and sample survey template

This is a general remote-learning pulse survey template aimed at gauging student experience with online/remote instruction broadly, not exam proctoring or privacy specifically. It's a fielding-ready template on an established survey platform, but institutions would need to substantially rewrite or supplement it to cover exam fairness and proctoring acceptability. Useful as a broader remote-learning satisfaction pulse rather than a proctoring/privacy-focused instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with a ready-to-use template and presumably customizable question library
  • Targets the same general audience (students in remote/online learning settings)
  • Likely supports standard question types (multiple choice, rating scales) for quick deployment

아쉬운 점

  • No exam-specific or proctoring-specific content (no proctoring feature checklist, no ranking of proctoring practice acceptability, no data-handling trust items)
  • Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe why students feel exams were fair/unfair or how privacy concerns arose
  • No published methodology on question design or transparent prompt logic, and no automated per-response quality scoring

자주 묻는 질문

“Remote Exam Fairness & Privacy Perceptions Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 25개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to this survey about your experiences with remote exams. This survey explores your perceptions of fairness, pri…” · “In the last 12 months, have you taken any remote exams (proctored or unproctored)?” · “How many remote exams (including unproctored) did you complete in the last 12 months?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 25개를 약 11분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Education & Academic

온라인 및 하이브리드 학습 학생 경험 설문조사

온라인 및 하이브리드 강좌에서 학생의 참여도, 만족도, 인지된 학습 성과, 지원 요구 사항을 측정하여 근거 기반의 프로그램 개선을 이끌어내기 위한 설문입니다.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Evaluation Fairness & Representation Perceptions Survey for Developers

Measures software developers' perceptions of fairness, bias, and representativeness in their evaluation practices. Ideal for engineering leadership and DEI teams seeking to identify gaps in evaluation methodology and build more inclusive processes.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Performance Review Fairness & Clarity Assessment

Measures employee perceptions of fairness, clarity, and potential bias in the formal performance review process. Designed for HR teams seeking actionable insights to improve review equity and transparency.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Parent Experience With Distance Learning Survey

Captures how well remote or hybrid learning is working for your students and families — engagement, workload, tech reliability, and communication — with an AI follow-up that digs into the single biggest obstacle parents are facing at home.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Performance Review Fairness & Bias Assessment

Measures employee perceptions of objectivity, clarity, and potential bias in formal performance reviews. Designed for HR teams seeking to identify systemic issues and improve review processes.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

원격 모니터링 및 데이터 공유에 대한 환자 편의성

원격 환자 모니터링(RPM) 기기에 대한 환자 경험, 이해관계자 간 건강 데이터 공유에 대한 편안함, 신뢰 및 동의 선호도, 도입을 위한 지원 요구 사항을 측정합니다.

템플릿 보기