모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Retail Store Personality & Brand Character Survey

Measures how shoppers perceive a store's personality — trustworthy, trendy, premium, approachable — and whether that character matches what they actually want. Includes a best-worst trade-off on trait priority and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the mental image customers form of the brand and why.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your impressions of (Replace with Retailer Name)! We're curious how the store 'feels' to you as a shopper. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you shopped at (Replace with Retailer Name), in-store or online? (Template note: adjust the recency window to fit your category.)

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Monthly or more
  • Weekly or more
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree that (Replace with Retailer Name) feels each of these ways to you?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Trustworthy and reliable
  • Exciting and on-trend
  • Upscale or sophisticated
  • Down-to-earth and approachable
  • Practical and no-nonsense
  • 외 1개
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these traits best and worst describe the personality of (Replace with Retailer Name), based on your experience?

  • Trustworthy
  • Trendy
  • Friendly
  • Premium
  • Innovative
  • Traditional
  • Fun
  • Practical
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most like this store최악:Least like this store
Q05
의견 척도필수

If (Replace with Retailer Name) were a person you could befriend, how likely would you be to want them in your circle?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
평점 척도필수

How well does the store's overall personality match what you personally look for when you shop?

범위: 15
최소:Poor match최대:Excellent match
Q07
객관식

Compared to (Replace with Competitor A), how would you describe the personality of (Replace with Retailer Name)?

  • More premium / upscale
  • More approachable / friendly
  • More exciting / trend-driven
  • More practical / functional
  • About the same personality
Q08
단문형

If (Replace with Retailer Name) were a person, who would they be — a celebrity, character, or 'type' of person? Answer in one sentence.

Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the mental image the respondent has of the store as a 'person': ask them to describe how that person dresses, talks, or spends a weekend, and where that impression comes from (store design, staff, ads, product mix). Anchor on whichever trait they rated most strongly or picked in the trade-off question and probe why it fits or doesn't. If they compared it unfavorably to the competitor, ask what single change would shift the store's personality closer to what they want.

Q10
메시지

Almost done — just a couple of quick questions about you to help us understand different shopper groups.

Q11
객관식

Which age range best describes you?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing how the store feels to you! Your responses will help us shape the brand's look, tone, and in-store experience to better match what shoppers like you expect.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond simple agreement ratings with a best-worst trade-off exercise that forces respondents to prioritize which personality traits matter most, not just rate them all favorably
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the actual mental image a shopper forms of the brand and the reasoning behind it, rather than stopping at a single open-text answer
  • Directly measures fit between perceived personality and what the shopper personally wants, plus a head-to-head comparison against a named competitor
  • Produces an auto-generated report from transparent, reviewable prompts, so teams can see exactly how the AI probed each respondent

QuestionPro

Retail Store Personality Survey Template

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template covering the same core topic — store personality perception. It appears to rely on standard rating/multiple-choice question types rather than conversational follow-up. Good for quick deployment but likely leaves 'why' questions unanswered without manual open-text coding.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for the exact retail personality use case
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type library
  • Likely quick to launch given it's a pre-built template

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent perceives a trait a certain way
  • No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
  • No published transparent prompt methodology for how any AI-assisted analysis works

SurveySparrow

Retail Store Evaluation Survey Template

This template is framed around general retail store evaluation (service, cleanliness, experience) rather than brand personality specifically, so it's adjacent but broader than a dedicated personality/character study. It's a ready-to-use survey, useful if the goal is operational feedback rather than perceptual brand mapping. Trade-off or personality-trait-specific questions are not evident from the title.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style survey format known for the platform
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup
  • Likely mobile-friendly given SurveySparrow's product focus

아쉬운 점

  • Not focused on personality/trait perception specifically, so trait-priority trade-off analysis is unlikely to be included
  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the reasoning behind perceptions
  • No automated per-response quality scoring evident

Typeform

Retail Store Feedback Form Template

This is a general retail feedback form, likely oriented toward satisfaction and service feedback rather than brand personality mapping. It's a static, ready-to-field form with Typeform's typical conversational UI, but nothing on the page suggests trait-based personality measurement or trade-off questions. Best suited for operational feedback loops rather than brand-character research.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
  • Fast to deploy as a fielding-ready form
  • Familiar, low-friction respondent experience

아쉬운 점

  • No brand-personality trait framework or best-worst prioritization built in
  • No adaptive follow-up questioning based on prior answers
  • No structured, transparent AI-driven qualitative analysis

Jotform

Brand Personality Quiz Form Template

This is framed as a quiz format for exploring brand personality, which is conceptually close but likely genericized for any brand rather than retail-store-specific comparisons. It's a static, ready-to-use form; it does not appear to include competitor benchmarking or a trait-priority trade-off. Useful as a lightweight brand-character snapshot rather than a full perceptual/behavioral study.

잘하는 점

  • Quiz format may increase respondent engagement compared to plain surveys
  • Ready-to-use, no-code form builder deployment
  • Focused specifically on brand personality concept

아쉬운 점

  • No retail-specific competitor comparison question
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview to explore the reasoning behind quiz answers
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Secondary Trauma & Compassion Fatigue Check-In

For therapists, social workers, first responders, nurses, and other helping professionals regularly exposed to other people's trauma. Measures exposure levels, secondary traumatic stress symptoms, coping habits, and organizational support gaps, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom rather than relying on abstract self-ratings.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

피트니스 클래스 경험 및 유지 설문조사

회원분들이 저희 피트니스 클래스를 어떻게 경험하시는지 — 강사 자질, 클래스 활력, 스케줄, 그리고 가치 — 그리고 무엇이 계속 방문하시거나 이탈하시게 만드는지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 회원의 만족도와 갱신 가능성 뒤에 숨겨진 진짜 이야기를 파고듭니다. 회원 경험과 이탈 위험을 추적하는 헬스장, 스튜디오, 부티크 피트니스 운영자를 위해 제작되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Outdoor Gear Website Shopping Experience Survey

Measures how well an outdoor gear or apparel website helps visitors find, evaluate, and buy products — from product findability to sizing confidence and trust in performance claims. Built for e-commerce, UX, and merchandising teams in the outdoor industry. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs what a specific shopper actually did on the site, going beyond checkboxes to what convinced or stopped them from buying.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Service Provider Trust & Value Attitude Survey

Measures how clients perceive the trust, expertise, and value of a professional or B2B services provider — built for agencies, consultancies, and account teams tracking client sentiment. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind trust and value ratings instead of stopping at the number.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Public Library Patron Experience & Usage Survey

Measures how often people use their local public library, which services they rely on, and how satisfied they are with staff, collections, hours, and digital access. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing what would actually get them back in the door more often — useful for library directors and city/county planning teams.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

웹사이트 구축 프로세스 및 워크플로우 설문조사

개인과 팀이 웹사이트를 구축하거나 재설계하는 데 실제로 어떻게 시간을 사용하는지 — 어떤 도구에 의존하는지, 어디에서 마찰이 쌓이는지, 각 단계에서 얼마나 만족하는지를 파악합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰를 통해 응답자가 겪은 가장 큰 병목을 심층적으로 파악하여, 무슨 일이 있었는지와 (있다면) 어떤 우회 방법을 사용했는지 재구성합니다.

템플릿 보기