Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Education & Academic
Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation
Captures how students experience a teacher's clarity, fairness, feedback, and engagement using a rating battery and a best-worst trade-off on what matters most, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their lowest rating instead of a vague complaint. Built for course or semester-end teacher evaluations.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식
Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?
- This is my first
- Two
- Three
- Four or more
Q03
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Explains concepts clearly
- Is fair and unbiased in grading
- Encourages questions and participation
- Provides timely feedback on assignments
- Manages class time effectively
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수
Overall, how effective is this teacher at helping you learn the material?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q05
객관식
In the last month, how often did this teacher respond when you asked for help outside of class (email, office hours, messages)?
- Never asked
- Never responded
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every time I asked
Q06
평점 척도필수
How clear were this teacher's grading criteria and expectations for assignments?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
For each set, pick which quality matters most and which matters least to your learning in this teacher's class.
- Explains material clearly
- Is approachable and available for help
- Grades fairly
- Gives useful feedback on work
- Makes the subject interesting
- Manages the classroom effectively
- Is well organized and prepared
- Cares about student success
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this teacher's class to another student?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Identify the statement the respondent rated lowest in the earlier agreement battery (or the aspect behind a low overall effectiveness score) and get a specific, recent example of it happening in class — what occurred, how it affected their learning, and whether it was a one-time issue or a pattern. If everything was rated highly, probe what this teacher does that other teachers don't, anchored on a concrete classroom moment.
Q10
장문형
Is there anything specific this teacher could do differently to help you learn better?
Q11
객관식
What grade or year level are you in?
- 9th grade
- 10th grade
- 11th grade
- 12th grade
- College/University
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses are combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership to support this teacher's development.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Uses a rating and agreement-statement battery to establish where a teacher is weakest, then triggers an AI follow-up interview specifically on the statement the student rated lowest, replacing vague written complaints with a concrete moment
- Includes a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise so results show which qualities (clarity, fairness, feedback, engagement) matter most to students' learning rather than just raw averages
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale effectiveness, recommendation likelihood, grading-clarity rating) with an open-ended 'what could this teacher do differently' question and a targeted AI probe for richer, actionable qualitative detail
- Transparent about what's being asked and why, with a short intro/outro message framing the survey as ~5 minutes and confirming responses will be aggregated with other students'
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateA course/teacher evaluation template with sample questions covering instructor effectiveness and course quality, aimed at academic institutions. It's a static question set you can adapt, not an interactive interview. Good starting point for standard Likert-style course evaluations but leaves qualitative depth to open-text fields alone.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for academic course/teacher evaluation context
- Provides sample questions covering both course and instructor dimensions
- Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe a student's specific lowest-rated experience
- No built-in trade-off (best-worst) method to rank which teaching qualities matter most
- No published methodology for how open-ended responses are scored or summarized
SurveyMonkey
Teacher Evaluation Survey TemplateSurveyMonkey's teacher evaluation template targets high school settings and offers a ready-to-use question set on teaching quality. It's a conventional static form relying on multiple choice and rating scales, with no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low rating. Useful for quick deployment but limited for uncovering the story behind a poor score.
잘하는 점
- Well-known, easy-to-deploy survey builder with broad distribution options
- Template is pre-built specifically for high school teacher evaluation
- Likely includes standard reporting/analytics dashboards
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question flow with no adaptive interview to follow up on a student's lowest rating
- No best-worst trade-off question type to prioritize which teacher qualities matter most
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Free Teacher & Course Evaluation Form TemplateTypeform offers a conversational-style teacher and course evaluation form with a clean, one-question-at-a-time UI. It's a static template with no branching logic tied to a respondent's specific answers, so a low rating doesn't trigger any deeper questioning. Good for a pleasant respondent experience but not for structured qualitative follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational form UI that can improve completion rates
- Free template available, lowering barrier to entry
- Covers both course and teacher evaluation angles in one template
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to explore a specific complaint
- No max-diff/trade-off question to identify which qualities matter most to students
- No automated quality scoring of responses or transparent AI prompt disclosure
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Education & Academic
Campus Climate, Belonging, and Inclusion Survey
Measures students' sense of belonging, perceived fairness and safety, and firsthand experiences with exclusionary or discriminatory treatment on campus. Built for institutional research and DEI offices, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific incident or context behind a student's belonging score instead of leaving it as an abstract number.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Sex Education Program Effectiveness & Gaps Survey
Evaluates how comprehensive, comfortable, and useful a sex education program felt to students or recent graduates — covering which topics were actually taught, how comfortable people felt asking questions, and where they turned when information was missing. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific moment where the curriculum fell short, going deeper than a topic checklist.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
학문적 정직성과 부정행위 문화 조사
부정행위가 실제로 얼마나 흔한지, 학생들이 어떤 행동을 용인할 만하다고 여기는지, 그리고 무엇이 실제로 편법을 쓰기로 하는 결정을 이끄는지를 측정합니다 — 학문적 정직성 문화를 점검하는 학교와 학과를 위한 것입니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 죄책감을 유발하는 예/아니오 답변에 그치지 않고 특정 사건 이면의 사고 과정을 재구성합니다.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Student Loan Repayment Experience & Wellbeing Survey
Captures how borrowers experience student loan repayment — balance size, plan type, servicer satisfaction, and financial stress — plus a best-worst ranking of support options and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment repayment felt confusing, unaffordable, or manageable. Built for financial wellness teams, lenders, and student support offices.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey
Tracks how satisfied teachers are with workload, administrative support, pay, resources, and school culture, and flags retention risk before it shows up in resignation letters. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind each teacher's rating instead of settling for a number. Built for school leaders and district HR running an annual or mid-year staff pulse.
템플릿 보기Education & Academic
Pet Training Program Progress & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how well a training class, private trainer, or app actually changed a pet's behavior — covering goals worked on, progress made, and satisfaction with instruction. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behavior clicked (or didn't) and what got in the way, for trainers and pet-training platforms who want more than a star rating.
템플릿 보기