Website Retailer Satisfaction & Shopping Experience Survey
Measures how satisfied shoppers are with a retailer's website — from site speed and navigation to checkout and security trust — and where friction costs sales. Built for e-commerce and CX teams benchmarking site performance, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a shopper's last visit went right or wrong.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with Retailer Name)'s website to a friend or colleague?
In the last 3 months, how many times have you purchased from (Replace with Retailer Name)'s website?
- This was my first purchase
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6 or more times
How much do you agree with each statement about your recent visits to the site?
- The site loads quickly
- It's easy to find the products I'm looking for
- Search results are relevant to what I typed
- Product pages give me enough information to decide
- The checkout process is quick and simple
- 외 2개
Did any of the following make it harder to complete a purchase on your last visit?
- Site was slow to load
- Couldn't find the product I wanted
- Checkout required too many steps
- Shipping costs were higher than expected
- Preferred payment method wasn't available
- Site crashed or showed an error
- None of these
Which of these improvements would matter most to you if the site made them?
- Faster page load times
- Better product search and filtering
- More detailed product photos or videos
- Simpler, fewer-step checkout
- More payment options
- Lower or clearer shipping costs
- Live chat support during checkout
- Better experience on mobile phones
How would you rate the checkout process on your most recent order?
How confident are you that your personal and payment information is secure on this site?
Reconstruct exactly what happened during the respondent's most recent visit to the site: what they set out to buy, whether they completed the purchase, and the specific point (if any) where they hesitated, got confused, or almost gave up. If they flagged a friction point (slow load, checkout steps, missing payment method, errors) or gave a low security confidence or recommend score, probe concretely what happened and what would have fixed it in that moment rather than accepting a general complaint.
How likely are you to purchase from (Replace with Retailer Name) again in the next 3 months?
- Very unlikely
- Unlikely
- Not sure
- Likely
- Very likely
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
What is your annual household income?
- Under $25,000
- $25,000-$49,999
- $50,000-$74,999
- $75,000-$99,999
- $100,000-$149,999
- $150,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for shopping with us and sharing your experience! Your answers feed directly into a review of what we fix next on the site.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a static rating by including an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened during the shopper's most recent visit — probing the specific moment things went right or wrong, not just a satisfaction score.
- Covers the full funnel in one flow: site speed/navigation agreement statements (matrix), checkout rating, security/trust confidence, purchase friction (multiple choice), and a MaxDiff to prioritize which fixes matter most.
- Pairs quantitative signals (opinion scale NPS-style question, repurchase likelihood, purchase frequency) with qualitative depth from the AI interview, then rolls it into an auto-generated report.
- Built specifically for e-commerce/CX benchmarking with a friendly chat-message open/close, unlike generic website feedback templates that aren't tailored to retail checkout and trust concerns.
QuestionPro
Website Retailer Satisfaction Survey TemplateThis is a directly comparable, purpose-built template for retailer website satisfaction, covering similar ground (navigation, checkout, trust). It's a fielding-ready static questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview experience. Reporting and analysis tools are part of QuestionPro's broader platform rather than an automated per-response quality score.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the same use case (retailer website satisfaction), so question coverage likely maps closely to industry benchmarks
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad distribution and analytics tooling
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up — questions are fixed, so it can't dig into what specifically happened during a shopper's last visit
- No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for observing real checkout friction
Jotform
Website Satisfaction Survey Form TemplateA general-purpose website satisfaction form rather than one designed specifically for retail/e-commerce checkout and trust dynamics. It's a flexible, easily customizable static form builder, useful for quick deployment but not tailored to shopping-specific friction points like checkout or payment security.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
- Quick to deploy for general website feedback across many use cases, not just retail
아쉬운 점
- Generic website feedback focus, not built around retail-specific concerns like checkout friction or payment security trust
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore a specific shopping visit in depth
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated CX report — just raw form responses
Typeform
Ask your website visitors how good their experience wasThis is a general website UX survey template, not one specialized for retail checkout, purchase friction, or security trust. It's a fielding-ready conversational-style form, well known for its polished UI, but it's still a fixed question flow rather than an interview that adapts to each shopper's answers.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational-style question flow that's known for higher completion rates
- Simple to launch for broad website experience feedback
아쉬운 점
- Not tailored to e-commerce specifics like checkout, purchase frequency, or payment security confidence
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option — every respondent gets the same fixed questions
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology for deeper insight
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
웹사이트 방문자 후속 경험 설문조사
방문자가 사이트에 접속한 목적, 목적 달성 여부, 그리고 어디에서 막혔는지를 파악합니다 — 실패했거나 불편했던 방문 뒤에 숨겨진 실제 탐색 여정을 AI 후속 질문으로 재구성합니다. 단순한 이탈률 수치 이상을 원하는 제품, UX, 마케팅 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Makeup Product Experience & Purchase Drivers Survey
Measures how well a makeup product performs in real routines — application, wear time, and repurchase intent — plus what actually drives the buy decision. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment a product over- or under-delivered, surfacing details closed questions miss.
템플릿 보기Product Development Team Effectiveness Check
A team health survey for product, design, and engineering members that measures process clarity, cross-functional collaboration, time allocation, and the biggest blockers to shipping — with an AI follow-up that digs into a real recent example behind the top-ranked blocker instead of settling for a vague complaint.
템플릿 보기웹사이트 문의 경험 설문조사
방문자가 웹사이트의 문의 채널(양식, 이메일, 채팅, 전화)을 얼마나 쉽게 찾고 사용하며 답변을 받는지를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 혼란스럽거나 지연되었던 구체적인 순간을 심층적으로 살펴봅니다.
템플릿 보기웹사이트 사용성 및 만족도 평가
방문자가 웹사이트에서 원하는 것을 얼마나 쉽게 수행하는지, 속도·탐색·디자인·신뢰도 측면에서 사이트가 어떻게 평가되는지, 그리고 추천 의향이 얼마나 되는지를 측정합니다. 또한 AI 후속 질문을 통해 혼란스럽거나 문제가 발생한 정확한 순간을 심층적으로 파악합니다. 정기적인 사이트 상태 점검을 수행하는 제품, UX, 마케팅 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Pricing Plan Naming and Tier Structure Comprehension Study
Tests whether prospects can correctly interpret your plan names, pick the tier that actually fits them, and understand what changes when they upgrade. Built for pricing and product teams evaluating a new plan lineup before launch, with an AI follow-up that digs into exactly which name or feature line caused hesitation or a wrong guess.
템플릿 보기