모든 템플릿
Strategy & Transformation

Workday Time Audit: Meetings, Interruptions & Deep Focus

Measures employee meeting load, interruption frequency and recovery cost, and deep-focus availability to identify productivity blockers and inform schedule optimization.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 19개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Workday Time Audit Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes and asks about your recent experience with meetings, interruptions, and focus time. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual answers will be shared with managers or leadership. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective. Please answer based on your experience over the past 1–2 weeks.

Q02
드롭다운

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you spend in scheduled meetings?

  • 0 hours
  • 1–3 hours
  • 4–6 hours
  • 7–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • 21–25 hours
  • More than 25 hours
Q03
드롭다운

On a typical workday in the past week, approximately how many times was your focus interrupted (e.g., messages, drop-ins, unscheduled calls)?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–15
  • 16–20
  • More than 20
Q04
드롭다운

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you have for uninterrupted deep work (blocks of 30+ minutes)?

  • 0 hours
  • 1–3 hours
  • 4–6 hours
  • 7–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • More than 20 hours
Q05
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional context that would help us understand your experience (e.g., peak meeting days, common interruption sources, tools that help or hinder focus).

Q06
드롭다운

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months – 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q07
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey — your input helps us identify ways to protect focus time and improve how we work together.

Q08
드롭다운

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many scheduled meetings did you attend?

  • 0
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16–20
  • 21–25
  • More than 25
Q09
드롭다운

After a typical interruption, approximately how many minutes does it take you to regain full focus?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • 11–15 minutes
  • 16–20 minutes
  • More than 20 minutes
Q10
의견 척도

Over the past two weeks, how sufficient has your uninterrupted focus time been for completing your core work?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all sufficient최대:Completely sufficient
Q11
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn more about your workday experience. An AI moderator will ask 1–2 brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q12
드롭다운

Which of the following best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / Supervisor
  • Manager
  • Senior manager / Director
  • VP / Executive
  • Other
Q13
의견 척도

Overall, how would you describe your meeting load over the past two weeks?

척도: 17
최소:Very light최대:Very heavy
Q14
의견 척도

How disruptive are interruptions to your ability to complete your core work?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all disruptive최대:Extremely disruptive
Q15
객관식

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • Fully on-site
  • Hybrid (mix of on-site and remote)
  • Fully remote
Q16
의견 척도

Over the past two weeks, most meetings I attended had a clear agenda or purpose.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
의견 척도

Over the past two weeks, my presence was necessary in most meetings I attended.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
의견 척도

Over the past two weeks, most meetings I attended ended with clear next steps or decisions.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
의견 척도

Over the past two weeks, many of the meetings I attended could have been handled via email or a shared document.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

자주 묻는 질문

“Workday Time Audit: Meetings, Interruptions & Deep Focus” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 19개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the Workday Time Audit Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes and asks about your recent experienc…” · “In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you spend in scheduled meetings?” · “On a typical workday in the past week, approximately how many times was your focus interrupted (e.g., messages, drop-ins…”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 19개를 약 9분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Manager 1:1 Quality & Cadence Survey

Measures the frequency, coaching quality, and follow-through of manager 1:1 meetings. Designed for HR and people operations teams seeking to identify gaps and improve manager effectiveness across teams.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

회의 가능 시간 및 일정 선호도 설문조사

직원들이 실제로 언제 회의에 참석할 수 있고 참석할 의향이 있는지, 회의 시간이 실제로 어떻게 배분되는지, 그리고 일정 관리의 마찰이 어디에서 집중 업무를 갉아먹는지를 파악합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰를 통해 최근 잘못 진행된 특정 회의 하나와 그것을 개선할 수 있었던 방법을 심층적으로 파헤칩니다. 회의 문화를 점검하는 운영, IT, 인사 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey

Measures how employees actually experience the meetings on their calendar — frequency, agenda discipline, time well spent, and what they'd fix first — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Planning Tool Experience & Pain Points

Measures how people actually schedule, reschedule, and coordinate meetings today — time spent, satisfaction with current tools, and which features would save the most time. Built for product and operations teams evaluating or building meeting planning software. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent scheduling breakdown instead of relying on a generic satisfaction score.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll

Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.

템플릿 보기