Q01
Message
All templatesMarketing & Growth
Marketing Claims and Messaging Testing Survey
Tests how believable, relevant, and differentiating your candidate marketing claims are, using a best-worst trade-off to force priority among competing lines and an AI follow-up that digs into why the top claim landed or fell flat. Built for brand, product marketing, and comms teams validating messaging before a campaign launch.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
15 questions · ~8 min
Q02
Text Highlight
Read the claim below and highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you, whether positive or negative.
(Replace with candidate claim 1, e.g. 'The only planner that adapts to your day in real time.') (Template note: replace with your own claim text before launching.)
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
How believable is this claim?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all believableMax:Extremely believable
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
How relevant is this claim to your own needs?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all relevantMax:Extremely relevant
Q05
Message
Now here's a second version of the claim, describing the same product a different way.
Q06
Text Highlight
Again, highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you.
(Replace with candidate claim 2, e.g. 'Finally, a planner smart enough to keep up with you.') (Template note: replace with your own claim text before launching.)
Q07
Opinion ScaleRequired
How believable is this second claim?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all believableMax:Extremely believable
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired
How relevant is this second claim to your own needs?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all relevantMax:Extremely relevant
Q09
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)
Across all the claims you've seen (plus a few more), which best describe what makes this product worth choosing, and which fall flattest?
- (Replace with claim A)
- (Replace with claim B)
- (Replace with claim C)
- (Replace with claim D)
- (Replace with claim E)
- (Replace with claim F)
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most convincingWorst:Least convincing
Q10
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which single claim would most make you want to learn more about this product?
- (Replace with claim A)
- (Replace with claim B)
- (Replace with claim C)
- (Replace with claim D)
Q11
Multiple Choice
Does any claim you saw feel exaggerated, confusing, or hard to trust?
- (Replace with claim A)
- (Replace with claim B)
- (Replace with claim C)
- (Replace with claim D)
Q12
AI Interview
Focus on the claim the respondent picked as most convincing (or flagged as confusing/exaggerated). Ask them to put in their own words what they think the claim is actually promising, whether they'd expect the product to deliver on it, and what proof or detail would make them trust it more. If they flagged a claim as exaggerated, probe exactly which word or phrase triggered that reaction and whether a softer version would still be compelling.
Q13
Opinion ScaleRequired
Based on everything you read, how likely would you be to consider this product?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q14
Multiple Choice
Which age range are you in?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q15
Message
That's everything — thank you! Your reactions will directly shape which claims we keep, revise, or drop before launch.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a best-worst max-diff exercise that forces respondents to prioritize among multiple competing claims rather than rating each in isolation
- Pairs believability and relevance opinion-scale ratings for each claim with a highlight task to see exactly which words or phrases land
- Uses an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes why the respondent's top-picked (or most confusing) claim worked or didn't, going beyond static rating data
- Ends with an automated report and transparent prompts, so marketing and comms teams can see both the scores and the reasoning behind them before a campaign launch
SurveyMonkey
Messaging/claims Testing Survey TemplateThis is a direct, fielding-ready template for testing marketing claims and messaging, matching QuestionPunk's use case closely. It's a static questionnaire built around rating scales and closed-ended items rather than adaptive dialogue. SurveyMonkey's broad panel and analytics ecosystem make it a natural point of comparison.
What it does well
- Purpose-built specifically for claims/messaging testing, not a generic survey
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
- Likely includes standard rating and ranking question types suited to messaging comparisons
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to ask respondents why a claim landed or fell flat
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Product Concept Testing Survey TemplateThis template targets concept testing broadly rather than claims/messaging trade-off testing specifically, so it's adjacent rather than a like-for-like match. It's a static, conversational-style form rather than a true adaptive interview. Useful for teams validating a product concept, but not built around forced-choice claim prioritization.
What it does well
- Typeform's conversational UI format tends to feel more engaging than plain grid surveys
- Good for early-stage concept reactions rather than fine-grained claim comparison
- Easy to customize visually for brand-consistent fielding
Where it falls short
- No best-worst/max-diff mechanism to force priority among competing claims
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to dig into open-ended reactions
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Marketing Claims and Messaging Testing Survey” template?
The template includes 15 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for joining! We're testing a few different ways of describing our product and want your honest reactions — there…” · “Read the claim below and highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you, whether positive or negative.” · “How believable is this claim?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 15 questions in about 8 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Marketing & Growth
Social Media Content Consent & Comfort Survey
Explores how comfortable customers are when brands reshare their photos, tags, reviews, or comments in marketing — and what would make them more willing to say yes. Built for marketing, social, and legal teams shaping user-generated-content and permission policies, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment someone felt uneasy or declined.
View templateMarketing & Growth
Advertising Campaign Impact & Recall Evaluation
Tests how a specific ad lands — attention, message clarity, believability, likability, and purchase intent — plus which creative elements actually stick. An AI follow-up interview digs into the 'why' behind the intent score so you're not left guessing from numbers alone. Built for brand and creative teams pre- or post-launch.
View templateMarketing & Growth
Corporate Marketing Perception & Impact Survey
Gauges how customers and prospects actually experience a company's marketing — which channels land, whether the message is clear and differentiated, and how the brand's qualities come across. An AI follow-up interview digs into the 'why' behind clarity and differentiation scores instead of stopping at the number.
View templateMarketing & Growth
Advertisement Concept & Creative Evaluation Survey
Tests a single ad — video, print, or social creative — for clarity, appeal, relevance, and purchase impact before it goes live. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment respondents got confused, bored, or excited, surfacing the 'why' behind the ratings so creative teams know exactly what to cut, keep, or clarify.
View templateMarketing & Growth
Ad Copy Variant Comparison & Reaction Survey
Tests two or more ad copy variants head-to-head for clarity, appeal, believability, and relevance before a campaign goes live. Built for marketers and copywriters choosing between headline or messaging options. The AI follow-up interview digs into which specific words or phrases drove the winning ad and what would need to change to make the others land.
View templateMarketing & Growth
Product Concept Appeal & Purchase Intent Test
Tests how a new product or service concept lands with your target audience — appeal, differentiation, believability, and purchase intent — plus a best-worst trade-off on concept features and a price sensitivity check. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind purchase intent scores so you know what to fix before you build it.
View template