Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment
Measures documentation burden, system usability, and data capture pain points among clinical trial site staff. Designed for site coordinators, investigators, and research personnel to identify operational bottlenecks and prioritize workflow improvements.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the past 12 months, have you worked on clinical trials at your site?
- Yes
- No
Outside of clinical trials, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on clinical documentation and data entry in the past 30 days?
- Less than 2 hours
- 2–5 hours
- 6–10 hours
- 11–20 hours
- 21–30 hours
- More than 30 hours
On average, how many hours per week did you spend on trial documentation and data entry in the past 30 days?
- Less than 2 hours
- 2–5 hours
- 6–10 hours
- 11–20 hours
- 21–30 hours
- More than 30 hours
Which tools did you use for trial data capture in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Sponsor-specific EDC
- eSource platform
- EHR-to-EDC integration
- Paper source
- Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel)
- Other (please specify)
Please rank your top 3 biggest trial data capture pain points (1 = biggest).
- Protocol complexity impacting data entry
- Duplicate entry between source and EDC
- System performance/downtime
- High query volume
- Training/retraining requirements
- Scheduling/coordination conflicts
How confident are you that your site can meet sponsor data timelines over the next 3 months?
What type of site do you primarily work at?
- Academic medical center
- Community hospital
- Private practice
- Independent research site/SMO
- FQHC/Public clinic
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform efforts to reduce site burden and improve data capture workflows. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
What is your primary role in clinical trials at your site?
- Principal Investigator (PI)
- Sub-Investigator
- Study Coordinator/CRC
- Research Nurse
- Data Manager
- Pharmacist
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how burdensome was non-trial clinical documentation in the past 30 days?
Overall, how burdensome was trial data capture at your site in the past 30 days?
Which was your primary system for entering trial data in the past 30 days?
- Sponsor-specific EDC
- eSource platform
- EHR-to-EDC integration
- Paper source
- Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel)
- Other
Which of the following trial activities took the most of your time in the past 30 days? Please rank your top 3 (1 = most time).
- Source documentation
- EDC data entry
- Query management/resolution
- Visit scheduling/coordination
- Regulatory/IRB documentation
- Training/meetings
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about site documentation or data capture.
How many years have you worked in clinical research (any role)?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–6 years
- 7–10 years
- 11–15 years
- More than 15 years
How many interventional trials did you actively support in the past 30 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
Which systems took most of your non-trial documentation time in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.
- EHR
- Quality registry portals
- Prior authorization portals
- Spreadsheets
- Paper forms
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about your primary trial data entry system, how easy or difficult was it to navigate between forms and pages?
What one change would most reduce trial data capture burden at your site?
We'd like to understand your experience with trial documentation and data capture in more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What patient population do you primarily serve?
- Adults
- Pediatrics
- Both
What was the single biggest barrier to efficient non-trial documentation in the past 30 days?
How easy or difficult was it to enter and save patient data in your primary system?
Which trial phases do you typically support? Select all that apply.
- Phase I
- Phase II
- Phase III
- Phase IV/Post-market
- Medical device studies
- Other (please specify)
How easy or difficult was it to manage and resolve queries in your primary system?
In which region do you primarily work?
- North America
- Western Europe
- Eastern Europe
- Latin America
- Asia-Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- Other
How easy or difficult was it to generate reports or export data from your primary system?
Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary system for trial data entry?
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview block that lets site staff elaborate in their own words on documentation and data-capture pain points, going beyond fixed-choice questions
- Combines burden ratings (opinion scales), tool/system usage questions, and ranking questions to pinpoint which specific systems and activities create the most workload
- Captures role, trial phase, region, and experience context so results can be segmented by coordinator vs. investigator vs. site type
- Asks directly about confidence in meeting sponsor data timelines, giving a forward-looking operational risk signal that a generic form does not capture
Typeform
Data Capture Form TemplateThis is a generic data capture form template, not a clinical trial or research-specific survey, and it appears to be a static form rather than a fielding-ready assessment with branching or scoring logic. It could be manually adapted for research use but includes none of the clinical-trial-specific content (system usability, query resolution, timeline confidence) found in QuestionPunk's template.
優れている点
- Clean, simple UI for basic data collection
- Easy to customize field types for general-purpose intake
- Part of a well-known no-code form builder ecosystem
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe open-ended pain points
- Not tailored to clinical trial workflows, roles, or terminology
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated operational report generation
よくあるご質問
「Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with clin…」・「In the past 12 months, have you worked on clinical trials at your site?」・「Outside of clinical trials, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on clinical documentation and data entry…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。