すべてのテンプレート
Healthcare & Clinical

Clinician Adverse Event Reporting Experience Survey

Measures clinicians' reporting behaviors, system usability, barriers to completeness, and safety culture around adverse event and near-miss reporting. Designed to surface actionable improvements for patient safety and quality leaders.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全26問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Clinician Adverse Event Reporting Experience Survey. This survey explores your experiences with reporting adverse events and near misses, including system usability, barriers, and feedback culture. Your responses will help identify practical improvements to reporting processes and patient safety. • Participation is voluntary. You may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest perspective. • All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • Estimated time: approximately 12 minutes. By continuing, you consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

Does your role involve direct or indirect patient care, or oversight of patient safety or quality processes?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
プルダウン

Approximately how many adverse event or near-miss reports have you submitted in the past 6 months?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q04
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how easy or difficult is it to file a report in your primary reporting system?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you that your reports capture all the details needed for learning and follow-up?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q06
オピニオンスケール

I feel safe reporting adverse events and near misses without fear of blame or repercussions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q07
ランク付け

Please rank the following potential improvements from most to least impactful for your reporting experience.

  1. Simpler or faster reporting form
  2. Clearer guidelines on what to report
  3. Better feedback after submitting a report
  4. More training or job aids
  5. Stronger no-blame culture
  6. Better integration with the EHR
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
選択式

What is your primary role?

  • Physician
  • Nurse
  • Advanced practice provider (NP/PA)
  • Pharmacist
  • Allied health professional
  • Quality/safety professional
  • Administrator/manager
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be analyzed in aggregate to identify actionable improvements to reporting processes and patient safety. If you have questions, please contact [survey administrator].

Q10
選択式

When a near miss occurs in your work area, how often do you report it?

  • Always
  • Often
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Never
  • Not applicable — I have not witnessed a near miss in this period
Q11
選択式

Typically, how long does it take you to complete one report?

  • Under 5 minutes
  • 5–10 minutes
  • 11–20 minutes
  • 21–30 minutes
  • More than 30 minutes
Q12
オピニオンスケール

The required fields in the reporting system capture the information needed for learning and follow-up.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q13
選択式

After submitting a report, how often do you receive feedback on the outcome or follow-up actions within 30 days?

  • Always
  • Often
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Never
  • Not applicable — I have not submitted a report
Q14
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what one change would most improve the ease or completeness of adverse event reporting in your practice?

Q15
選択式

What is your primary clinical setting?

  • Inpatient hospital
  • Emergency department
  • Ambulatory/clinic
  • Surgery/perioperative
  • Behavioral health
  • Long-term care
  • Home health
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

The steps required to submit a report are clear and easy to follow.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q17
選択式

Which of the following factors most hinder your ability to report events or to report them completely? Select all that apply.

  • Limited time or workload
  • Unclear what qualifies as reportable
  • System is cumbersome or slow
  • Duplicate entry across systems
  • Lack of training or guidance
  • Concerns about blame or repercussions
  • Uncertain where to submit
  • Little or no feedback after reporting
  • Technical issues or EHR integration problems
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
選択式

Have you received any training on adverse event or near-miss reporting in the past 12 months?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q19
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your reporting experiences in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions about your biggest challenges or suggestions for improving adverse event reporting.

Q20
選択式

How many years have you been in clinical practice?

  • 0–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21+
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult is it to locate and access the reporting form or system?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q22
選択式

Which of the following training formats or job aids would help you report more easily and completely? Select all that apply.

  • One-page quick guide or checklist
  • Short video (3–5 minutes)
  • In-system tooltips or prompts
  • Live refresher session
  • Case-based examples
  • None of the above
Q23
選択式

Which best describes your typical work schedule?

  • Day
  • Evening
  • Night
  • Rotating
  • Varies
  • Not applicable
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult is it to select the correct event type and category?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q25
選択式

In which region is your primary workplace located?

  • U.S. Northeast
  • U.S. Midwest
  • U.S. South
  • U.S. West
  • Outside the U.S.
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult is it to enter the event narrative and supporting details?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines closed-ended usability and barrier questions (ease of locating forms, clarity of steps, narrative entry difficulty) with an AI follow-up interview that lets clinicians elaborate on their actual reporting experience in their own words.
  • Captures safety-culture signal directly (fear of blame/retaliation) alongside practical friction points like report completion time and required-field adequacy, so quality leaders get both attitudinal and process data in one instrument.
  • Uses ranking and open-text questions to surface prioritized, actionable improvements rather than only satisfaction scores, plus role/setting/tenure segmentation for analysis by department or experience level.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean patient safety teams get synthesized findings without manually coding open-ended responses.

Jotform

Adverse Event Reporting Form Template

This is a static intake form for logging an actual adverse event, not a survey measuring clinicians' reporting behaviors or attitudes. It's fielding-ready as a data-capture form but doesn't address usability perceptions, barriers, or safety culture. Useful as a point-of-event reporting tool rather than a research instrument.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form builder
  • Likely supports file uploads and conditional fields typical of Jotform templates
  • Easy to embed in hospital intranets or workflows

物足りない点

  • Captures event details, not clinician experience or perceptions of the reporting process
  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to probe why barriers exist
  • No published methodology for question design or scoring

Typeform

Adverse Event Reporting Form

Similar to Jotform's offering, this is a conversational-style static form for submitting an adverse event rather than a survey studying reporting behavior, usability, or culture. It offers a clean respondent experience but no mechanism to explore why clinicians under-report or find the process difficult.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
  • Simple to deploy for straightforward event logging
  • Mobile-friendly design typical of Typeform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview to probe reasoning behind low report rates
  • Not designed to measure safety culture or systemic barriers
  • No automated report synthesizing themes across responses

SurveyMonkey

AHRQ Surveys On Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS®) Medical Office Survey

This is a validated, standardized safety-culture survey based on AHRQ's SOPS framework, making it a genuine comparable for the culture dimension of our template. However, it's a fixed-instrument questionnaire and doesn't specifically probe reporting-system usability, completion friction, or training needs the way our template does.

優れている点

  • Based on a validated, widely benchmarked AHRQ instrument
  • Established norms allow cross-organization comparison
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and reporting tools

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up probing on individual pain points
  • Not tailored to reporting-form usability or step-by-step process friction
  • No AI-driven qualitative deep-dive into individual respondent barriers

SurveySparrow

Patient Safety Culture Survey Template

A conversational-style safety culture survey template comparable to our culture-related items, but it lacks the reporting-workflow-specific usability questions (form findability, narrative entry ease, field adequacy) and the training/improvement-prioritization sections in our template. It's fielding-ready but narrower in scope.

優れている点

  • Conversational chat-style survey format may improve completion rates
  • Focused specifically on safety culture themes
  • Part of a broader healthcare template library

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up for nuanced barrier exploration
  • Doesn't cover reporting-system usability or completion-time specifics
  • No transparent, published scoring methodology or automated qualitative synthesis

よくあるご質問

「Clinician Adverse Event Reporting Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Clinician Adverse Event Reporting Experience Survey. This survey explores your experiences with reporting…」・「Does your role involve direct or indirect patient care, or oversight of patient safety or quality processes?」・「Approximately how many adverse event or near-miss reports have you submitted in the past 6 months?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る