Feature Retirement Risk & Migration Readiness Survey
Assesses user dependency, workaround patterns, and transition readiness before sunsetting a product feature. Designed for product teams making data-driven go/no-go retirement decisions.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the past 30 days, have you used Feature X?
- Yes
- No
How central is Feature X to your primary day-to-day workflow?
Which workarounds or alternatives do you currently use when Feature X falls short? (Select all that apply)
- Manual steps or spreadsheets
- Third-party product
- API or custom scripts
- Another feature in this product
- Ask a teammate for help
- Avoid the task entirely
- None — Feature X meets my needs
If Feature X were retired, what would you primarily switch to?
- Another feature in this product
- My own manual process
- A different product or vendor
- Custom scripts or API
- Not sure
- Other
Based on your responses, is there anything else we should understand about how Feature X fits into your work, or any concerns about its potential retirement?
Which role best describes you?
- Product management
- Engineering / Development
- Design / UX
- Data / Analytics
- Operations
- Customer support
- Executive / Leadership
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly inform our planning process. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact [support channel].
Approximately how often did you use Feature X in the past 30 days?
- Once or twice
- A few times (3–5 days)
- About weekly (6–10 days)
- Several times a week (11–20 days)
- Daily or near-daily (21–30 days)
If Feature X were removed in 60 days, how disruptive would that be to your work?
How much additional effort do these workarounds add to your work?
How much time would you need to fully adapt without Feature X?
- Same day
- 1–3 days
- 1–2 weeks
- 3–4 weeks
- 1–2 months
- 3+ months
How long have you used this product?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–3 months
- 4–6 months
- 7–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3+ years
- Prefer not to say
What are the main reasons you have not used Feature X recently? (Select all that apply)
- Didn't need it for my tasks
- Wasn't aware of it
- Found it hard to use
- Performance or reliability issues
- Another tool replaces it for me
- No longer part of my role
- Other (please specify)
What resources or support would you need for a smooth transition away from Feature X? (Select all that apply)
- Bulk export of my data
- Mapping or compatibility guide
- Suggested alternative workflows
- Templates or scripts
- Advance communication or notice period
- Dedicated support channel
- No additional support needed
- Other (please specify)
Approximately how many employees does your organization have?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–10,000
- 10,001+
- Prefer not to say
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Technology
- Finance
- Healthcare
- Education
- Retail
- Manufacturing
- Government / Non-profit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes usage-frequency and workaround-mapping questions specifically designed to quantify dependency on a feature slated for retirement, not just general satisfaction
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended context on how people actually rely on the feature, going beyond fixed-choice answers
- Captures transition readiness directly (time needed to adapt, resources needed, likely replacement) so the results map to a go/no-go retirement decision
- Segments responses by role, tenure, org size, and industry so product teams can see which cohorts are most at risk before sunsetting the feature
SurveyMonkey
Product Feature Survey TemplateA general-purpose static template for gathering feedback on a product feature, likely covering satisfaction and usefulness rather than retirement-specific risk. It's a ready-to-field form but not tailored to dependency, workaround, or migration-readiness analysis. Best suited for feature feedback rather than a sunset decision.
優れている点
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's large-scale survey infrastructure and easy distribution
- Quick to deploy for general feature feedback
- Familiar, simple respondent experience
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe individual dependency or workaround patterns
- Not structured around retirement risk, disruption scoring, or transition timelines
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses
Typeform
Product Readiness Assessment by Smartbug MediaA conversational-style readiness assessment focused on general product readiness rather than feature-specific retirement risk or migration planning. It offers Typeform's polished UI but appears to be a fixed-question flow without adaptive probing. Useful as a broad readiness check, not as a targeted go/no-go retirement tool.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational form design typical of Typeform templates
- Good for capturing general readiness sentiment quickly
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into why users depend on a specific feature
- Not designed to quantify workaround effort or disruption if a feature is removed
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated retirement-decision report
QuestionPro
Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample QuestionnaireA broad product evaluation template aimed at assessing overall satisfaction and feature usefulness, not specifically at retirement risk or transition planning. It's a fielding-ready static questionnaire with sample questions, useful for general evaluation but not for measuring dependency or migration readiness. Good starting point if adapted heavily, but not purpose-built for sunset decisions.
優れている点
- Sample questionnaire provides a solid baseline for general product evaluation
- Established survey platform with analytics and reporting tools
- Supports multiple question types for broad feedback collection
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI or voice interview capability to explore individual workaround reasoning
- No built-in framework for scoring disruption risk or adaptation time before a retirement decision
- No transparent, published prompt methodology for any AI-assisted analysis
よくあるご質問
「Feature Retirement Risk & Migration Readiness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が17問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for participating! This short survey (approximately 9 minutes) asks about your experience with Fe…」・「In the past 30 days, have you used Feature X?」・「How central is Feature X to your primary day-to-day workflow?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、17問を約8分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。