QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Nonprofit & Civic

Local Government Project Community Engagement Poll

Gauges resident awareness, support, and concerns for a local government project — plus which design option they favor and how they want ongoing updates. An AI follow-up probes the reasoning behind each support score, surfacing what would actually shift an opponent or strengthen a supporter's backing.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for weighing in on the (Replace with project name, e.g., 'Riverside Park Redesign') project! This short poll covers what you know, how you feel, and what design you'd prefer. About 5 minutes, and your answers help shape the final plan.

Q02
選択式必須

Before today, how familiar were you with the (Replace with project name) project?

  • Never heard of it before now
  • Heard the name but didn't know details
  • Somewhat familiar with the plans
  • Very familiar — I've followed it closely
Q03
選択式

Where have you mainly heard about this project, if anywhere?

  • Local news (TV, paper, radio)
  • City/town website
  • Social media
  • Neighbors or word of mouth
  • Public meeting or hearing
  • Mailer or flyer
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how much do you support this project moving forward as currently proposed?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Strongly oppose最大:Strongly support
Q05
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's support score, anchoring on the number they gave. If they scored 7 or above, find out what specifically they're excited about and whether anything could still change their mind. If they scored 4 or below, identify the single biggest driver of opposition and ask what change to the plan (if any) would move their score up. If they land in the middle, surface what information or reassurance they're missing to form a firmer opinion.

Q06
マトリクス

How much of a concern is each of the following about this project?

6行 × 4列
  • Traffic and parking
  • Cost to taxpayers
  • Environmental impact
  • Impact on local businesses
  • Construction noise or disruption
  • ほか1件
列: Not a concern · Minor concern · Moderate concern · Major concern
Q07
ランク付け

Rank these design options from most to least preferred. (Template note: replace with the actual 2-4 design concepts being considered for this project before launching.)

  1. Option A – (Replace with description)
  2. Option B – (Replace with description)
  3. Option C – (Replace with description)
  4. None of these options
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

For the winning design, which features matter most to you? (Template note: swap in the real feature list for this project.)

  • Walking and biking paths
  • Parking availability
  • Green space and landscaping
  • Public seating areas
  • Lighting and safety
  • Accessibility features
  • Public art or gathering spaces
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most to me最も悪い:Matters least to me
Q09
選択式

How would you like to stay informed as this project moves forward?

  • Email updates
  • City/town website
  • Social media
  • Direct mail
  • Public meetings
  • Text/SMS alerts
Q10
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything else you'd like the project team to know before decisions are finalized?

Q11
選択式

Which age range are you in?

  • Under 18
  • 18-29
  • 30-44
  • 45-59
  • 60-74
  • 75 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
自由回答（短文）

What neighborhood or ZIP code do you live in? (Helps us understand which areas are hearing about this project.)

Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your input! Responses are compiled into a report for the project team and used to inform final design decisions and outreach plans — no individual answers will be shared publicly.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up (AI follow-up interview block) that probes the reasoning behind each individual's support score, anchoring on the number they gave, instead of just collecting a static rating
  • Combines opinion-scale support measurement with a matrix of concern areas, a ranking of design options, and a max-diff on the winning design's features — letting teams see not just sentiment but which specific attributes drive it
  • Captures how residents want ongoing updates and includes an open open-ended for anything decisions-makers should know before finalizing, plus demographic/geographic fields (age range, neighborhood/ZIP) to segment support by area
  • Ends with a message confirming responses feed into a report for the project team, matching QuestionPunk's auto-generated report workflow

SurveySparrow

Online Political Poll Template

A fielding-ready template aimed at general political/civic opinion polling rather than a specific local infrastructure or development project. It covers broad political sentiment questions but isn't built around design-option choices or project-specific concern tracking. Useful as a generic public-opinion starting point, less tailored to a single named local project.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use polling template with SurveySparrow's standard multi-channel distribution
  • Likely offers simple branching/skip logic for a political-poll context
  • Positioned within a community/civic template category, so audience framing is at least broadly aligned

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a resident holds a given support level — reasoning must be captured through fixed-choice questions if at all
  • No transparent, published prompt/methodology for how questions were derived
  • Not structured around comparing project design options or surfacing what would shift an opponent's position

SurveyMonkey

USA Government Support Programs Survey Template & Sample Questions

This template is oriented toward assessing awareness and use of government support/assistance programs, not toward gauging community sentiment on a specific local development or infrastructure project. It's a static, fielding-ready questionnaire good for benchmarking program awareness rather than surfacing design preferences or persuasion levers. The subject matter overlaps only loosely with a local-project engagement poll.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with large template library and standard analytics/reporting
  • Question set likely pre-validated for general government-program awareness research
  • Easy to launch quickly given SurveyMonkey's mature distribution and panel options

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview capability to dig into individual reasoning behind support or opposition to a project
  • Not designed to rank or trade off competing project design options (no ranking/max-diff logic evident)
  • No transparent per-question prompt methodology published, and no mechanism to surface what would change an opponent's or supporter's stance

よくあるご質問

「Local Government Project Community Engagement Poll」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for weighing in on the (Replace with project name, e.g., 'Riverside Park Redesign') project! This short poll cove…」・「Before today, how familiar were you with the (Replace with project name) project?」・「Where have you mainly heard about this project, if anywhere?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Neighborhood Safety Perception & Priorities Survey

A resident-facing survey for local government and public safety offices that measures how safe people feel by time of day, whether streetlighting and infrastructure support that feeling, and how often incidents actually get reported. An AI follow-up probes the specific location and moment behind a resident's lowest safety rating, surfacing concrete detail a scale score alone can't capture.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Program & Engagement Feedback Survey

Gauges how satisfied community members are with an organization's programs, services, and communication, and what would most improve their experience. Built for nonprofits, civic groups, and neighborhood associations; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific experience behind each person's satisfaction rating and top priority instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Attitudes Toward Local Wind Energy Projects

Measures awareness, support, and concerns among residents near a wind energy project — covering noise, visual impact, trust in the developer, and perceived local benefits. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason behind each respondent's level of support, giving developers and utilities the qualitative context behind the numbers before community meetings or permitting decisions.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Neighborhood Livability and Community Feedback Survey

Captures how residents really feel about safety, upkeep, amenities, and community spirit where they live, with an AI follow-up that digs into the one issue affecting quality of life most. Built for city planners, HOAs, and community organizations tracking neighborhood health over time.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Public Opinion Poll on a Current Issue

A flexible opinion-poll template for gauging where people stand on a policy, event, or public issue — covering awareness, position, reasoning, and priority concerns. An AI follow-up interview digs into the personal experience or belief behind each respondent's stance instead of just recording a for/against label. Swap in your specific issue and options before launch.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Microgrid Attitudes & Governance Preferences Survey

Measures resident support for community microgrids, preferred ownership models, participation willingness, and priority tradeoffs. Designed for municipal planners and civic organizations assessing community readiness for local energy infrastructure.

テンプレートを見る