すべてのテンプレート
AI & Technology

Red Team Program Effectiveness Assessment

Collects structured stakeholder feedback on red-team risk coverage, report quality, and remediation follow-through to identify actionable program improvements across security, engineering, and leadership functions.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全33問・約14分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey (approximately 14 minutes) asks about your experience with our red-team program over the past 12 months. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective based on direct experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the program.

Q02
選択式

Which best describes your primary involvement with red-team exercises in the past 12 months?

  • Consume findings to make decisions
  • Implement technical fixes
  • Defensive operations / blue team
  • Product or operations stakeholder
  • Compliance / governance
  • Executive / leadership sponsor
  • Other
Q03
メッセージ

The following questions ask how well red-team exercises covered key areas in the past 12 months. If you lack direct experience with an area, select the midpoint.

Q04
プルダウン

What reporting cadence do you prefer for red-team results and trends?

  • After each exercise
  • Quarterly rollup
  • Biannual
  • Annual
  • On-demand only
  • Not sure
Q05
オピニオンスケール

In your experience, how quickly are teams typically able to act on red-team findings after report delivery?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very slowly最大:Very quickly
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the overall maturity of our red-teaming program today?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very early stage最大:Best-in-class
Q07
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the red-team program that we haven't covered.

Q08
選択式

Which best describes your primary organizational function?

  • Engineering / Development
  • Security (including blue team)
  • IT / Infrastructure
  • Product / Operations
  • Compliance / Risk / GRC
  • Executive / Leadership
  • Other
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time. Your input directly informs how we improve red-team coverage, reporting, and overall program impact.

Q10
プルダウン

Approximately how many red-team exercises have you directly engaged with in the past 12 months?

  • 0 (aware but not directly engaged)
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover application-layer security (web, mobile, APIs)?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q12
ランク付け

Please rank the following elements of a red-team report from most to least valuable to your work.

  1. Executive summary with business impact
  2. Attack narrative / timeline
  3. Evidence and impact detail
  4. Reproduction steps / proof-of-concept
  5. Exploitability / likelihood rationale
  6. Prioritized remediation plan
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q13
選択式

What most commonly hinders follow-through on red-team findings? (Select up to 3)

  • Limited engineering bandwidth
  • Disagreement on risk or severity
  • Unclear ownership of findings
  • Tooling or visibility gaps
  • Vendor or third-party dependency
  • Competing priorities
  • Budget constraints
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
自由回答(長文)

If you could change one thing about the red-team program for the next cycle, what would it be?

Q15
プルダウン

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior manager
  • Director
  • VP / C-level
  • Other / Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover infrastructure and cloud environments?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q17
オピニオンスケール

Red-team reports are delivered in a timely manner relative to exercise completion.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q18
自由回答(長文)

Please share one example from the past 12 months where a red-team finding led to a meaningful improvement or fix. If none comes to mind, you may skip this question.

Q19
AIインタビュー

You've shared thoughts on improving the red-team program. Could you elaborate on what specific changes would have the greatest impact on your team's security posture?

Q20
プルダウン

How long have you been in your current role at this organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover identity and access management (authentication/authorization)?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q22
オピニオンスケール

Red-team reports clearly communicate business impact alongside technical findings.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q23
プルダウン

Where are you primarily located?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover third-party and supply-chain risks?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q25
オピニオンスケール

Remediation recommendations in red-team reports are specific and actionable.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q26
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover social engineering and human factors?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q27
オピニオンスケール

Red-team reports contain the right level of technical detail for my needs.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q28
オピニオンスケール

How well did red-team exercises cover physical security?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q29
オピニオンスケール

Findings in red-team reports are prioritized effectively by risk severity.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q30
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how confident are you that red-teaming is currently focused on our highest-risk areas?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q31
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how valuable are red-team findings to your work?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all valuable最大:Extremely valuable
Q32
ランク付け

Please rank the following areas by where additional red-team focus would most reduce organizational risk over the next 6 months (top = highest priority).

  1. Application layer (web, mobile, APIs)
  2. Infrastructure and cloud
  3. Identity and access management
  4. Third parties and supply chain
  5. Social engineering and human factors
  6. Physical security
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q33
選択式

In your view, which specific areas are most under-tested relative to their potential business impact? (Select up to 3)

  • Crown-jewel applications
  • Secrets management
  • Privilege escalation paths
  • Data exfiltration routes
  • Human factors / social engineering
  • Third-party integrations
  • Cloud control plane
  • Lateral movement
  • Other (please specify)

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

よくあるご質問

「Red Team Program Effectiveness Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が33問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey (approximately 14 minutes) asks about your experience with our red-team program over the past 12 mo…」・「Which best describes your primary involvement with red-team exercises in the past 12 months?」・「The following questions ask how well red-team exercises covered key areas in the past 12 months. If you lack direct expe…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、33問を約14分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る