すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Post-Incident Trust & Communication Assessment

Measures incident impact, communication effectiveness, and trust recovery across stakeholder roles. Designed for internal post-incident reviews to identify systemic improvement priorities.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全29問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey asks about one specific incident from the last 90 days. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest perspective. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve incident response practices. The survey takes approximately 13 minutes to complete.

Q02
メッセージ

Please think about the single most recent incident that affected your team or work in the last 90 days. All of the following questions refer to that specific incident.

Q03
オピニオンスケール

How much impact did this incident have on customer experience or revenue?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact at all最大:Extreme impact
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the timeliness of incident communications you received?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q05
オピニオンスケール

Compared with before the incident, how would you describe your current level of trust in the affected system or process?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Much lower than before最大:Much higher than before
Q06
ランク付け

Rank the following areas by how much improvement they need for incidents like this one. Place the highest-priority area at the top.

  1. Early detection speed
  2. Update cadence during response
  3. External/customer communication clarity
  4. Decision-making and alignment
  5. Ownership and role clarity
  6. Tooling/visibility (dashboards, alerts)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
選択式

Where are you primarily based?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East/Africa
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for your time. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our incident response and recovery processes.

Q09
選択式

What was your primary stakeholder role during that incident?

  • Engineering (dev/infra/SRE)
  • Product management
  • Customer support/success
  • Sales or account management
  • Marketing/PR
  • Operations/IT
  • Security/compliance
  • Executive/leadership
  • Other
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How much impact did this incident have on internal team productivity?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact at all最大:Extreme impact
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the accuracy of incident communications you received?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q12
選択式

How long did it take until you were comfortable resuming normal operations?

  • Immediately after mitigation
  • Within the same day
  • 1–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • More than a week
  • Still not fully comfortable
Q13
自由回答(長文)

If you could change one thing to reduce business impact next time, what would it be?

Q14
選択式

What is your organization's approximate size?

  • 1–49 employees
  • 50–249 employees
  • 250–999 employees
  • 1,000–4,999 employees
  • 5,000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
選択式

How directly were you involved in managing the incident?

  • Primary responder/on-call
  • Contributor or subject-matter expert
  • Informed stakeholder/observer
  • Affected but not involved in response
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How much impact did this incident have on team morale or confidence?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact at all最大:Extreme impact
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the clarity of incident communications you received?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of post-incident follow-up (e.g., post-mortem review, action items, assigned owners)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q19
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your incident experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q20
選択式

What is your current job level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director
  • VP/C-level
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
プルダウン

What was the business severity level assigned to that incident?

  • Sev-1 (critical, widespread impact)
  • Sev-2 (high, significant impact)
  • Sev-3 (moderate, limited impact)
  • Sev-4 (low, minor impact)
  • Not sure
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How much impact did this incident have on SLA compliance or contractual obligations?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact at all最大:Extreme impact
Q23
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the completeness of incident communications you received?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q24
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about this incident or the recovery process?

Q25
選択式

How long have you been with your current organization?

  • 0–6 months
  • 7–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
選択式

Approximately how long was customer-visible impact present?

  • Under 30 minutes
  • 30–59 minutes
  • 1–3 hours
  • 3–12 hours
  • 12–24 hours
  • More than 24 hours
  • Not sure or not customer-visible
Q27
選択式

Which single channel did you rely on most for incident updates?

  • Email
  • Chat (e.g., Slack/Teams)
  • Status page or incident tool
  • Pager/on-call app notifications
  • Live briefings/meetings
  • Ticketing system (e.g., Jira/ServiceNow)
  • Other
Q28
プルダウン

Approximately how many separate incidents affected your work area in the last 90 days?

  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • More than 10
  • Not sure
Q29
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how useful were the incident communications in enabling you to do your job?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all useful最大:Extremely useful

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Focuses on one specific recent incident (not communication in general), capturing severity, duration, and impact on customer experience, productivity, morale, and SLA compliance in a single structured flow
  • Breaks communication effectiveness into distinct dimensions (timeliness, accuracy, clarity, completeness) plus channel reliance, rather than a single generic rating
  • Includes trust-recovery-specific measures (current trust level vs. before the incident, time to resume normal operations, post-mortem quality) that generic communication surveys don't cover
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended answers like the ranked improvement areas and the 'what would you change' response, plus a closing open-text question, giving depth static forms can't reach

SurveySparrow

Communication Skills Assessment Questionnaire Template

This is a general employee communication skills questionnaire, not an incident-specific trust or impact assessment. It's a ready-to-field template but covers competency/style rather than post-incident recovery dynamics. Useful for periodic communication reviews rather than event-driven incident debriefs.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use fielding template aimed at employee communication skills
  • Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for quick deployment
  • Positioned within a broader employee-experience template library

物足りない点

  • No incident-specific framing (severity, duration, customer impact) evident in the title/purpose
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
  • No published methodology for how scores or quality are derived

QuestionPro

Company Communication Survey | Communication survey questions

A general company communications evaluation template, useful for broad internal comms health checks but not built around a specific incident or trust-recovery timeline. It reads as a standard survey template rather than an incident post-mortem tool. Good for recurring comms pulse checks, not systemic incident-review reporting.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with a dedicated communication-survey template
  • Likely covers multiple facets of internal communication broadly
  • Part of a larger library of survey templates for easy customization

物足りない点

  • No apparent incident-severity, duration, or stakeholder-role segmentation
  • Fixed-question format; no adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up
  • No transparent scoring/prompt methodology published on the page

Typeform

Communication Style Survey Form

This template assesses individual communication style/preferences rather than organizational post-incident communication effectiveness or trust recovery. It's a conversational-style form good for engagement, but not designed for incident review or stakeholder-role comparison. Best viewed as a personality/style survey, not an incident assessment.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational form format typical of Typeform templates
  • Good for capturing individual communication-style preferences
  • Easy to customize for general workplace communication topics

物足りない点

  • No incident, severity, or trust-recovery focus in scope
  • No adaptive AI or voice-based follow-up interviews
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report described

よくあるご質問

「Post-Incident Trust & Communication Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey asks about one specific incident from the last 90 days. Your participation is voluntary and you may…」・「Please think about the single most recent incident that affected your team or work in the last 90 days. All of the follo…」・「How much impact did this incident have on customer experience or revenue?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る