Post-Incident Trust & Communication Assessment
Measures incident impact, communication effectiveness, and trust recovery across stakeholder roles. Designed for internal post-incident reviews to identify systemic improvement priorities.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Please think about the single most recent incident that affected your team or work in the last 90 days. All of the following questions refer to that specific incident.
How much impact did this incident have on customer experience or revenue?
How would you rate the timeliness of incident communications you received?
Compared with before the incident, how would you describe your current level of trust in the affected system or process?
Rank the following areas by how much improvement they need for incidents like this one. Place the highest-priority area at the top.
- Early detection speed
- Update cadence during response
- External/customer communication clarity
- Decision-making and alignment
- Ownership and role clarity
- Tooling/visibility (dashboards, alerts)
Where are you primarily based?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East/Africa
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our incident response and recovery processes.
What was your primary stakeholder role during that incident?
- Engineering (dev/infra/SRE)
- Product management
- Customer support/success
- Sales or account management
- Marketing/PR
- Operations/IT
- Security/compliance
- Executive/leadership
- Other
How much impact did this incident have on internal team productivity?
How would you rate the accuracy of incident communications you received?
How long did it take until you were comfortable resuming normal operations?
- Immediately after mitigation
- Within the same day
- 1–3 days
- 4–7 days
- More than a week
- Still not fully comfortable
If you could change one thing to reduce business impact next time, what would it be?
What is your organization's approximate size?
- 1–49 employees
- 50–249 employees
- 250–999 employees
- 1,000–4,999 employees
- 5,000+ employees
- Prefer not to say
How directly were you involved in managing the incident?
- Primary responder/on-call
- Contributor or subject-matter expert
- Informed stakeholder/observer
- Affected but not involved in response
How much impact did this incident have on team morale or confidence?
How would you rate the clarity of incident communications you received?
How would you rate the quality of post-incident follow-up (e.g., post-mortem review, action items, assigned owners)?
We'd like to explore your incident experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your current job level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Director
- VP/C-level
- Other
- Prefer not to say
What was the business severity level assigned to that incident?
- Sev-1 (critical, widespread impact)
- Sev-2 (high, significant impact)
- Sev-3 (moderate, limited impact)
- Sev-4 (low, minor impact)
- Not sure
How much impact did this incident have on SLA compliance or contractual obligations?
How would you rate the completeness of incident communications you received?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about this incident or the recovery process?
How long have you been with your current organization?
- 0–6 months
- 7–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long was customer-visible impact present?
- Under 30 minutes
- 30–59 minutes
- 1–3 hours
- 3–12 hours
- 12–24 hours
- More than 24 hours
- Not sure or not customer-visible
Which single channel did you rely on most for incident updates?
- Chat (e.g., Slack/Teams)
- Status page or incident tool
- Pager/on-call app notifications
- Live briefings/meetings
- Ticketing system (e.g., Jira/ServiceNow)
- Other
Approximately how many separate incidents affected your work area in the last 90 days?
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- More than 10
- Not sure
Overall, how useful were the incident communications in enabling you to do your job?
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Focuses on one specific recent incident (not communication in general), capturing severity, duration, and impact on customer experience, productivity, morale, and SLA compliance in a single structured flow
- Breaks communication effectiveness into distinct dimensions (timeliness, accuracy, clarity, completeness) plus channel reliance, rather than a single generic rating
- Includes trust-recovery-specific measures (current trust level vs. before the incident, time to resume normal operations, post-mortem quality) that generic communication surveys don't cover
- Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended answers like the ranked improvement areas and the 'what would you change' response, plus a closing open-text question, giving depth static forms can't reach
SurveySparrow
Communication Skills Assessment Questionnaire TemplateThis is a general employee communication skills questionnaire, not an incident-specific trust or impact assessment. It's a ready-to-field template but covers competency/style rather than post-incident recovery dynamics. Useful for periodic communication reviews rather than event-driven incident debriefs.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use fielding template aimed at employee communication skills
- Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for quick deployment
- Positioned within a broader employee-experience template library
物足りない点
- No incident-specific framing (severity, duration, customer impact) evident in the title/purpose
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
- No published methodology for how scores or quality are derived
QuestionPro
Company Communication Survey | Communication survey questionsA general company communications evaluation template, useful for broad internal comms health checks but not built around a specific incident or trust-recovery timeline. It reads as a standard survey template rather than an incident post-mortem tool. Good for recurring comms pulse checks, not systemic incident-review reporting.
優れている点
- Established survey platform with a dedicated communication-survey template
- Likely covers multiple facets of internal communication broadly
- Part of a larger library of survey templates for easy customization
物足りない点
- No apparent incident-severity, duration, or stakeholder-role segmentation
- Fixed-question format; no adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up
- No transparent scoring/prompt methodology published on the page
Typeform
Communication Style Survey FormThis template assesses individual communication style/preferences rather than organizational post-incident communication effectiveness or trust recovery. It's a conversational-style form good for engagement, but not designed for incident review or stakeholder-role comparison. Best viewed as a personality/style survey, not an incident assessment.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational form format typical of Typeform templates
- Good for capturing individual communication-style preferences
- Easy to customize for general workplace communication topics
物足りない点
- No incident, severity, or trust-recovery focus in scope
- No adaptive AI or voice-based follow-up interviews
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report described
よくあるご質問
「Post-Incident Trust & Communication Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey asks about one specific incident from the last 90 days. Your participation is voluntary and you may…」・「Please think about the single most recent incident that affected your team or work in the last 90 days. All of the follo…」・「How much impact did this incident have on customer experience or revenue?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。