Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートDeveloper & Engineering
Software Tool Evaluation & Adoption Fit Survey
Captures how a software tool actually performed during a trial, pilot, or proof-of-concept — usability, integrations, support, and value for cost — and ranks which factors matter most to the decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind the adoption call, including near-misses and blockers. Built for engineering, IT, and product teams running a formal tool evaluation.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
Which best describes your role in this evaluation?
- Primary evaluator / decision maker
- Team member trying it hands-on
- Manager reviewing the team's recommendation
- IT or security reviewer
- Other
Q03
選択式必須
How long have you been using (Replace with software name) during this evaluation?
- Less than a week
- 1-2 weeks
- 3-4 weeks
- More than a month
Q04
マトリクス必須
Rate (Replace with software name) on each of the following:
6行 × 5列
- Ease of use
- Performance and speed
- Documentation quality
- Integration with your existing tools
- Customer or community support responsiveness
- ほか1件
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
評価スケール必須
How easy was it to get set up and running with (Replace with software name)?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
From the factors below, which matters most and which matters least when deciding whether to adopt this tool?
- Ease of use
- Integration options
- Performance and speed
- Pricing
- Customer support
- Security and compliance
- Customization
- Documentation and onboarding resources
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
ポイント配分必須
Allocate 100 points across these factors based on how much each actually influenced your evaluation so far.
- Functionality
- Ease of use
- Price
- Support quality
- Security
100ポイントを配分
Q08
選択式
Did you evaluate any alternative tools alongside (Replace with software name)?
- Yes, a formal side-by-side comparison
- Yes, informally
- No
- Not sure
Q09
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with software name) to a colleague facing a similar need?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct the real story behind this evaluation, anchored on the recommendation score and the top-ranked factor from the trade-off question. Ask what specifically happened that produced that score, whether there was a moment they nearly gave up on the tool or nearly decided against it, and what would need to change for their confidence to go up. If they mention integration or support issues, get the concrete detail (what broke, how long it took to resolve) rather than a general impression.
Q11
自由回答（長文）
What's the single biggest gap or blocker that would stop your team from fully adopting (Replace with software name)?
Q12
選択式
How large is your team or department?
- 1-5 people
- 6-20 people
- 21-100 people
- More than 100 people
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback feeds directly into the go/no-go decision on (Replace with software name), and we'll share the outcome with everyone who took part.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond scored matrix and setup-ease ratings to include a MaxDiff and constant-sum exercise so teams can quantify which factors (cost, integrations, support, usability) actually drove the decision
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the real story behind the recommendation, surfacing near-misses and blockers that fixed-choice questions can't capture
- Captures context often missing from generic templates — role in the evaluation, trial duration, alternatives considered, and team size — so responses can be segmented and weighted properly
- Ends with a long-text blocker question and an auto-generated report designed to feed directly into a go/no-go adoption decision
Jotform
Software Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, drag-and-drop form template covering basic software evaluation criteria. It's built for quick customization and embedding rather than for structured decision analysis. Good for simple feedback collection, but lacks any mechanism to prioritize factors or dig into the reasoning behind scores.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization
- Fast to deploy and embed on a webpage
- Familiar Jotform ecosystem (integrations, notifications)
物足りない点
- No adaptive follow-up interview to probe why a score was given
- No built-in method to rank or weight which factors mattered most in the decision
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology
QuestionPro
20 Software Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily a guide/article listing sample questions and best practices rather than a fielding-ready survey. Useful as inspiration for question wording, but a researcher would still need to build the actual survey logic themselves. No structured prioritization or narrative-reconstruction tools are included.
優れている点
- Broad list of sample question ideas for coverage
- Educational framing on what to ask and why
- Backed by an established survey platform if built out further
物足りない点
- Not a ready-to-field template — requires manual assembly
- No adaptive AI interview or voice interview option
- No mechanism for ranking or point-allocating decision factors
SurveyMonkey
Software Evaluation Survey TemplateA standard fielding-ready template with typical satisfaction and feature-rating questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools. It works well for broad usability feedback but treats every respondent's answers as static, with no way to reconstruct the story behind a rating.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready with SurveyMonkey's distribution and panel options
- Familiar reporting dashboards
- Quick to launch for general feedback
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview to surface blockers and near-misses
- No constant-sum or MaxDiff-style prioritization of decision factors
- No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
SurveySparrow
Software Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational-style form template that improves respondent experience over static grids, fielding-ready out of the box. It's still a fixed question flow, though, so it can't adapt questions in real time based on what a respondent says. Good for lightweight, friendly feedback collection rather than deep decision-reconstruction.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion rates
- Fielding-ready template
- Mobile-friendly presentation
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI probing or voice interview capability
- No factor-weighting tools like MaxDiff or constant-sum allocation
- No transparent, published interview methodology or automated quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Software Tool Evaluation & Adoption Fit Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for helping us decide on (Replace with software name)! This survey covers your hands-on experience during the eva…」・「Which best describes your role in this evaluation?」・「How long have you been using (Replace with software name) during this evaluation?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。