すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Survey Instrument Pretest: Clarity, Redundancy & Face Validity

A structured pilot review instrument for expert panelists or cognitive interview participants to evaluate draft survey items on clarity, redundancy, response-option quality, and face validity before fielding.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Survey Instrument Pretest: Clarity, Redundancy & Face Validity

Welcome to this survey pretest. We are asking you to evaluate the clarity, redundancy, and face validity of the draft items you recently reviewed. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions as a reviewer. Your responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate to improve the draft instrument. This review should take approximately 8–10 minutes.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約10分
メッセージ

Welcome to this survey pretest. We are asking you to evaluate the clarity, redundancy, and face validity of the draft items you recently reviewed. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions as a reviewer. Your responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate to improve the draft instrument. This review should take approximately 8–10 minutes.

Q01
選択式

Have you reviewed the draft item list provided by the researchers?

  • Yes
  • No
Q02
選択式

Have you previously participated in survey design or pilot testing?

  • No
  • Yes, once
  • Yes, multiple times
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how clear were the draft items to you (i.e., easy to understand on first reading)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How appropriate are the draft items for measuring the intended construct(s)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all appropriate最大:Extremely appropriate
Q05
選択式

Did any items seem redundant with each other?

  • No redundancy noticed
  • Yes, about 1 pair
  • Yes, about 2–3 pairs
  • Yes, 4 or more pairs
Q06
自由回答(長文)

If you noticed redundancy, please list the item numbers or exact wordings of the overlapping pairs and briefly explain why they seem redundant.

Q07
自由回答(長文)

If applicable, list any words or phrases in the draft items that were unclear, technical, or ambiguous.

Q08
選択式

How did the overall length of the item set feel?

  • Much too short
  • Slightly too short
  • About right
  • Slightly too long
  • Much too long
Q09
プルダウン

Approximately how long did your most recent review take?

  • Less than 5 minutes
  • 5–10 minutes
  • 11–20 minutes
  • 21–30 minutes
  • 31–45 minutes
  • More than 45 minutes
Q10
AIインタビュー

Now let's focus on specific draft items you found problematic. Please identify any items that had issues—such as unclear wording, double-barreled phrasing, leading or biased language, excessive length, ambiguous timeframes, undefined terms, or cultural insensitivity. For each, describe the issue and how you would rewrite the item.

Q11
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of the response options (e.g., scale labels, answer choices) in the draft items?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor quality最大:Excellent quality
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of the instructions accompanying the draft items?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor quality最大:Excellent quality
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How readable was the formatting and layout of the draft item list?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all readable最大:Extremely readable
Q14
プルダウン

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
選択式

What is your gender?

  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctoral degree
  • Professional degree (e.g., JD, MD)
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
プルダウン

What is your current employment status?

  • Student
  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed, seeking work
  • Unemployed, not seeking work
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
プルダウン

Which region do you currently live in?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
プルダウン

What is your primary language?

  • English
  • Spanish
  • Mandarin Chinese
  • Hindi
  • Arabic
  • Portuguese
  • French
  • German
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this review, do you have any additional suggestions to improve the clarity, reduce redundancy, or enhance the face validity of the draft items?

メッセージ

Thank you for completing this pretest review. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to the survey instrument before it is fielded.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Includes structured opinion-scale ratings for item clarity, construct appropriateness, response-option quality, instructions, and layout — not just a single overall rating
  • Built-in open-text prompts specifically ask panelists to flag redundant items and unclear wording by item number, supporting real pretest diagnostics
  • An AI follow-up interview probes deeper into specific problematic items after the closed-ended questions, something static form builders cannot replicate
  • Captures reviewer background (prior pilot-testing experience, review duration, demographics) to help researchers contextualize and weight expert feedback

よくあるご質問

「Survey Instrument Pretest: Clarity, Redundancy & Face Validity」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Have you reviewed the draft item list provided by the researchers?」・「Have you previously participated in survey design or pilot testing?」・「Overall, how clear were the draft items to you (i.e., easy to understand on first reading)?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る