360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review
Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?
- Manager
- Direct report
- Peer / colleague
- Cross-functional partner
- Self-assessment (this is my own review)
Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- 외 1개
Overall, how effective is (Employee Name) in their current role?
Which one area best describes (Employee Name)'s greatest strength right now?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Which one area is the biggest opportunity for (Employee Name) to grow?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Probe for a specific, recent example that illustrates both the strength and the growth area the respondent selected: what exactly did (Employee Name) do, in what situation, and what was the observable impact on the team or work? Anchor back to their overall effectiveness rating and ask what would need to change for that score to go up. If the respondent gave uniformly high ratings with no concrete detail, push gently for one real moment rather than a general impression; if they gave low ratings, ask what they'd want (Employee Name) to try differently in the next 30 days.
Describe one specific, recent example where you saw (Employee Name) demonstrate the strength you selected above. What did they do, and what was the impact?
What's one thing (Employee Name) could start, stop, or do differently to be more effective in their role?
How likely would you be to choose to work with (Employee Name) again on a future project or team?
How long have you worked with (Employee Name)?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Which department are you in? (Template note: replace with your own department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People / HR
- Other
- Prefer not to say
That completes (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Thank you for the thoughtful feedback — it will be synthesized alongside other reviewers' input and shared with the employee's manager to support their development plan.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes for a recent, concrete example illustrating both the rated strength and growth area — turning vague ratings into actionable evidence, not just a static comment box
- Combines structured multi-rater inputs (manager, peer, direct report, self) via a working-relationship question with matrix competency ratings, an overall effectiveness opinion scale, and open strength/growth pickers in one flow
- Pairs quantitative signals (competency matrix, effectiveness scale, 'work with again' likelihood scale) with qualitative long-text prompts on specific behaviors and one thing to start/stop/do differently — built for real development conversations, not just scoring
- Uses transparent, visible prompts throughout (the AI follow-up interview's probing intent is stated in plain language) rather than a black-box adaptive engine
Jotform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable 360 review form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, likely with rating fields and comment boxes. Good for quick deployment and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a static form template rather than an interview-driven feedback tool. No indication of adaptive follow-up or automated qualitative analysis of open responses.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Likely supports standard rating scales and comment fields for quick setup
- Broad integrations with Jotform's app ecosystem (e.g., for storage, notifications)
아쉬운 점
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to probe vague ratings for concrete behavioral examples
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how responses are structured or scored
- No voice AI interview option for raters who prefer speaking over typing
QuestionPro
360-degree Review Survey TemplateA survey-platform template for 360 reviews with QuestionPro's standard survey logic (branching, scales, reporting dashboards). It's positioned as a fielding-ready enterprise survey template with decent reporting depth, but like most survey tools it relies on fixed question sets rather than dynamic interviewing. No mention of AI-driven probing or per-response quality scoring.
잘하는 점
- Enterprise-grade survey platform with established reporting and dashboard tools
- Likely supports skip logic and multiple rater types within one survey
- Established analytics suite for aggregating multi-rater scores
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question sequence — no adaptive AI interview to dig deeper into individual answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-text feedback
- No transparent, visible AI prompt methodology published on the page
SurveySparrow
Manager 360 Feedback TemplateA conversational-style survey template focused specifically on manager 360 feedback, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more natural. It's a fielding-ready template but scoped to manager feedback rather than full multi-rater (peer/direct-report/self) review, and the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptively AI-driven.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style interface that may feel more engaging than a static form
- Purpose-built framing for manager-specific feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product
아쉬운 점
- Narrower scope (manager feedback) versus a full multi-rater 360 including peers, direct reports, and self
- Conversational UI is pre-scripted, not adaptive — no AI follow-up that probes individual answers for specifics
- No indication of automated quality scoring or voice AI interview capability
Typeform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time form template well-suited to 360 reviews, leveraging Typeform's known strength in respondent experience. It's fielding-ready out of the box, but it's a fixed form flow — there's no dynamic AI interviewing to follow up on vague or generic answers with targeted probing.
잘하는 점
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time UX that Typeform is well known for
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Likely mobile-responsive and quick to deploy
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — all questions are fixed regardless of how a rater answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring or structured behavioral-evidence extraction
- No published prompt transparency or voice AI interview option
자주 묻는 질문
“360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 13개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking part in (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized…” · “What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?” · “Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 13개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
고객 온보딩 경험 및 가치 실현 시간 설문조사
신규 고객이 계약 체결 후 실질적인 가치를 얻기까지 얼마나 순조롭게 진행되었는지를 측정합니다 — 커뮤니케이션, 다음 단계의 명확성, 가치 실현 시간을 다루며, 단일 만족도 점수에 의존하는 대신 마찰이 정확히 어디에서 발생했는지를 재구성하는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.
템플릿 보기360-Degree Problem-Solving Competency Assessment
A multi-rater (self, manager, peer, direct report) survey that measures how well someone identifies root causes, weighs options, uses data, and makes sound decisions under pressure. Combines a behavior-frequency battery and a strengths/development trade-off with an AI follow-up that digs into one concrete example instead of vague impressions. Built for HR teams running competency-based 360 reviews.
템플릿 보기360 Peer Evaluation & Working Relationship Survey
A structured peer-review template for 360-degree feedback cycles — covering core collaboration competencies, an overall effectiveness rating, and a best-worst prioritization of development areas — plus an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete incident behind the rating so feedback isn't just a number. Built for HR, people ops, and team leads running peer review cycles.
템플릿 보기360도 다면 평가 피드백: 역량, 강점 및 개발 과제
동료의 역량을 평가하고, 강점을 파악하며, 개발 우선순위를 도출할 수 있도록 동료, 관리자, 그리고 부서 간 파트너를 대상으로 설계된 체계적인 360도 피드백 도구입니다. 실행 가능하고 기밀이 보장되는 다면 평가 인사이트를 필요로 하는 모든 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey
Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.
템플릿 보기Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In
A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.
템플릿 보기