360 Peer Evaluation & Working Relationship Survey
A structured peer-review template for 360-degree feedback cycles — covering core collaboration competencies, an overall effectiveness rating, and a best-worst prioritization of development areas — plus an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete incident behind the rating so feedback isn't just a number. Built for HR, people ops, and team leads running peer review cycles.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What is your working relationship with [peer's name]?
- I work on the same team as them
- I work with them across teams/departments
- They report to me
- I report to them
- Other
Based on your interactions in the last review period, how often has this person demonstrated the following?
- Communicates clearly and proactively
- Collaborates well with others on shared work
- Delivers reliable, high-quality output
- Takes initiative without being asked
- Handles disagreement or setbacks constructively
Overall, how effective has this person been in their role over the last review period?
In the last 3 months, how often did this person deliver agreed-upon work on time without needing reminders?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Not applicable — we haven't shared deadlines
If this person could focus on developing only one skill area next quarter, which would have the biggest impact — and which would matter least right now?
- Written and verbal communication
- Cross-team collaboration
- Time management and prioritization
- Technical or domain expertise
- Leadership and mentoring others
- Adaptability under changing priorities
- Strategic, big-picture thinking
Describe one specific situation where this person performed especially well. What happened, and what was the outcome?
Describe one specific situation where this person could have handled things better. What would you suggest they do differently?
Would you want to work with this person again on a future project?
- Yes, definitely
- Probably
- Unsure
- Probably not
- No
Probe the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating the respondent gave. Ask them to walk through the single most memorable interaction or project with this person that shaped that score, including what specifically happened and what the impact was. If the rating was low (0-5) or they said they wouldn't want to work with the person again, gently dig into whether this is a one-off incident or a recurring pattern, and what — if anything — would need to change. If the rating was high (9-10), ask what this person does that others on the team don't.
How long have you worked with this person?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your own role level relative to this person?
- Peer / same level
- More senior
- More junior
- Different function, not comparable
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Your responses will be combined with others' and shared with this person's manager as part of this review cycle, following your organization's feedback-sharing policy.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a single peer-evaluation form by pairing structured competency ratings (matrix, opinion scale, on-time delivery) with a best-worst max-diff prioritization of development areas, so results are ranked, not just scored.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating, reconstructing the concrete incident behind the number instead of leaving it as an unexplained score.
- Captures relationship context (working relationship, tenure, relative role level) alongside two open-ended critical-incident questions, giving reviewers structured qualitative evidence, not just ratings.
- Built specifically for HR/people-ops peer review cycles, with a closing message confirming responses will be combined into a report, rather than being a generic evaluation form repurposed for peer review.
Jotform
Create Free Peer Evaluation Forms - Peer Evaluation Form TemplatesA library of ready-to-use peer evaluation form templates aimed at general HR use, with drag-and-drop customization. It's a form-builder gallery rather than a single structured 360 instrument, so depth and consistency across templates likely vary. Good for quick deployment, less suited to standardized multi-rater review cycles.
잘하는 점
- Free to use and quick to customize with a drag-and-drop builder
- Wide variety of pre-built peer evaluation templates to choose from
- Easy integration into existing HR workflows via forms
아쉬운 점
- Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a rating
- No built-in mechanism to reconstruct specific incidents behind scores; relies on whatever open text fields are manually added
- No published methodology for how templates ensure comparability across raters in a formal 360 cycle
Typeform
Peer Evaluation Form TemplateA single conversational-style peer evaluation template with Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time UX, which makes it pleasant to fill out. It's a fixed set of questions, though, without any structured prioritization mechanism (like best-worst ranking) or a way to dig deeper into a given answer. Suited to lightweight peer feedback rather than a full 360 cycle with development-area prioritization.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface improves completion experience
- Simple to launch as a standalone peer feedback form
- Mobile-friendly design typical of Typeform templates
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
- No best-worst/max-diff style prioritization to force-rank development areas
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses or auto-generated synthesis report
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Client Relationship & Service Feedback Survey
Measures how satisfied clients are with your team's communication, quality, and responsiveness, then uses an AI follow-up to dig into the reasoning behind their loyalty score. Built for agencies, consultancies, and account teams who want to catch relationship risk before renewal time.
템플릿 보기Childhood Trauma History and Present-Day Impact Survey
Screens for adverse childhood experiences and maps how they show up in adults' relationships, work, and daily wellbeing today. Built for therapists, researchers, and mental health programs running trauma-informed intake or research, with an AI follow-up that gently explores coping and resilience without pressuring anyone for details they'd rather not share.
템플릿 보기Client Evaluation of Company Services Survey
Captures how clients rate your company's service quality, responsiveness, communication, and value, benchmarks loyalty with a standard recommendation score, and uses an AI follow-up interview to surface the specific interaction behind each rating. Built for account managers and service teams running periodic client reviews.
템플릿 보기Public Attitudes Toward the Death Penalty Survey
Measures where people stand on the death penalty — overall support, which crimes they think warrant it, and how they weigh deterrence, cost, fairness, and wrongful-conviction risk — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the reasoning and tensions behind their stance. Built for policy researchers, advocacy groups, and pollsters.
템플릿 보기Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey
Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.
템플릿 보기온라인 면접 지원자 경험 설문조사
지원자가 화상 면접 과정을 어떻게 경험했는지 — 플랫폼 안정성, 면접관 태도, 커뮤니케이션의 명확성, 전반적 인상 — 를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 지원자의 평가를 형성한 구체적 순간을 심층적으로 탐구합니다. 원격 채용 파이프라인을 운영하는 인재 채용 및 HR 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기