QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Education & Academic

Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey

Measures student satisfaction, perceived quality, and outcomes after academic advising sessions. Designed for institutional advising offices seeking actionable feedback to improve service delivery.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on academic advising. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes. Your responses are completely confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve advising services. Participation is voluntary, there are no right or wrong answers, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

When was your most recent academic advising interaction?

  • Within the last 2 weeks
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • More than 6 months ago
  • I have not met with an academic advisor
Q03
드롭다운

How many advising sessions have you had this academic term?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
Q04
의견 척도

How clearly did your advisor explain your academic options and next steps?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all clearly최대:Extremely clearly
Q05
객관식

Which of the following outcomes did you leave your advising interaction with? Select all that apply.

  • A plan for next term's courses
  • An updated degree audit or plan
  • Referrals to campus resources
  • Financial aid or policy guidance
  • Steps for academic improvement
  • Career or internship advice
  • None of the above
Q06
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your advising experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about what worked well and what could be improved.

Q07
객관식

What is your current student status?

  • Undergraduate—first year
  • Undergraduate—second year
  • Undergraduate—third year
  • Undergraduate—fourth year or more
  • Graduate—master's
  • Graduate—doctoral
  • Professional/other graduate
  • Non-degree/continuing education
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve academic advising services at your institution.

Q09
객관식

How did your most recent advising interaction take place?

  • In person
  • Video call
  • Phone
  • Email or chat
  • Group workshop
Q10
의견 척도

How knowledgeable was your advisor about your degree requirements and academic policies?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all knowledgeable최대:Extremely knowledgeable
Q11
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about your academic advising experience.

Q12
드롭다운

Which best describes your primary field of study?

  • Arts and humanities
  • Business
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health professions
  • Natural sciences
  • Social sciences
  • Computer and information sciences
  • Law or public policy
  • Undeclared
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
드롭다운

How long did you wait between booking and your advising session?

  • Less than 1 day
  • 1–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • More than 2 weeks
  • I did not need to book (walk-in)
Q14
의견 척도

How well did your advisor listen to and address your individual concerns?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all well최대:Extremely well
Q15
객관식

What is your enrollment status this term?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with your most recent advising experience?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q17
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend your advisor to another student?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q19
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운

Where is your institution located?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
객관식

Are you a first-generation college student? (Neither parent/guardian has a bachelor's degree.)

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes five distinct opinion-scale ratings (clarity of options explained, advisor knowledge of degree requirements, listening/responsiveness, overall satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend) for granular, benchmarkable service-quality data rather than a single satisfaction score.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into a student's advising experience in their own words, going beyond a static open-text box.
  • Captures session logistics and context (mode of interaction, wait time between booking and session, sessions taken this term, outcomes achieved) alongside demographic and equity-relevant fields like first-generation status and field of study, enabling segmentation advising offices actually need.
  • Pairs an open-text reflection question with automated, transparent-prompt AI reporting so advising offices get a synthesized summary instead of raw unstructured comments to read manually.

Jotform

Academic Advising Form Template

This is a fielding-ready, customizable form template built for capturing academic advising information via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It's the most directly comparable of the reviewed pages since it targets the same academic advising context, though it appears structured more as a general intake/feedback form than a dedicated satisfaction-and-outcomes research instrument. No AI-driven follow-up or automated response scoring is indicated.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for the academic advising use case, unlike generic service-satisfaction templates
  • No-code drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder, easy to adapt field labels and layout
  • Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview option — questions are static and identical for every respondent
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers
  • No indication of transparent, publishable AI prompt methodology since the product is a form builder, not an AI-interview platform

자주 묻는 질문

“Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 21개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome! Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on academic advising. This survey takes approximately 10 m…” · “When was your most recent academic advising interaction?” · “How many advising sessions have you had this academic term?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 21개를 약 10분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

이 템플릿 사용하기무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Education & Academic

Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey: Productivity, Well-being & Engagement

Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

대학생 만족도 및 경험 설문조사

학생들이 교육, 학업 상담, 시설, 캠퍼스 생활에 얼마나 만족하는지 추적하고, 최선-최악 선택 방식을 활용하여 어떤 개선 사항이 가장 중요한지 파악합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 각 학생의 만족도 점수 이면에 있는 구체적인 순간이나 경험을 파고들어 폐쇄형 질문이 놓치는 세부 사항을 끌어냅니다.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Financial Advisor Client Satisfaction Survey

Measures how clients experience their financial advisor relationship — communication cadence, clarity of the financial plan, understanding of fees, and confidence in the guidance received. An AI follow-up digs into the reasoning behind confidence scores so advisory firms can see exactly what builds or erodes trust, not just a number.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

템플릿 보기