모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Continuous Improvement Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures how well your continuous improvement or Kaizen-style program actually functions day to day — suggestion volume, leadership follow-through, training gaps, and real barriers — for operations and HR teams running lean or quality initiatives. An AI follow-up reconstructs what actually happened to a recent improvement idea instead of general opinions about the program.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part! This survey looks at how our continuous improvement process is actually working for you — what's helping, what's getting in the way. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Honest answers matter more than positive ones. About 6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how many process improvement ideas have you submitted, formally or informally?

  • None
  • 1-2
  • 3-5
  • 6 or more
Q03
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that a suggestion you submit will actually get reviewed and acted on?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about continuous improvement where you work?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I have enough time set aside to work on process improvements
  • Leadership actively supports continuous improvement efforts
  • Employees who submit ideas receive recognition for it
  • I've had adequate training on improvement tools and methods (e.g., Kaizen, PDCA, Six Sigma)
  • Follow-up happens on submitted ideas within a reasonable timeframe
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these get in the way of continuous improvement most, and which matter least?

  • Lack of time to work on improvements
  • Unclear process for submitting ideas
  • Little or no recognition for contributions
  • Insufficient training on improvement tools
  • No follow-up after ideas are submitted
  • Fear of criticism or blame if an idea fails
  • Too much bureaucracy or too many approval layers
  • Lack of visible leadership support
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Biggest barrier최악:Smallest barrier
Q06
평점 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate the continuous improvement process at your organization today?

범위: 15
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q07
점수 배분

Thinking about the time you personally spend on continuous improvement work, allocate 100 points across these activities based on where your time actually goes.

  • Identifying problems or opportunities
  • Implementing approved fixes
  • Measuring and tracking results
  • Training or coaching others
  • Administrative paperwork and reporting
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct what happened to the most recent improvement idea the respondent submitted or was aware of: what the idea was, what step it's stuck at or how it was resolved, and how long that took. Anchor on concrete dates and people involved rather than impressions. If they said they've submitted none in the last 3 months, probe specifically why not — unclear process, past bad experience, or genuinely no ideas — and dig into whichever barrier they rated as biggest in the previous question.

Q09
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend participating in this continuous improvement program to a coworker?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
객관식

Which best describes your role?

  • Front-line or production staff
  • Team lead or supervisor
  • Middle management
  • Senior leadership or executive
  • Support function (HR, IT, Finance, etc.)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 3-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be pooled with your team's to spot where the improvement process is working and where it's stalling, so it can actually get fixed.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened to a respondent's most recent submitted improvement idea, rather than just collecting general opinions
  • Combines quantitative measures (suggestion volume, agreement matrix, time-allocation breakdown, max-diff on barriers) with qualitative depth in a single flow
  • Separates role and tenure so operations and HR teams can segment results by who is closest to the shop floor versus leadership
  • Closes with a recommend-to-participate question and transparent framing that responses feed into a team-level report, supporting ongoing program tracking

SurveySparrow

Continuous Improvement Form Template

A static form template aimed at collecting continuous improvement ideas or feedback within an organization. It's ready to field quickly but is structured as a straightforward form rather than a diagnostic survey into program effectiveness, follow-through, or barriers. Best suited for basic idea intake rather than measuring how well a CI program actually runs.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy as a ready-made form
  • Fits SurveySparrow's broader survey/form platform for distribution and basic reporting
  • Simple structure likely easy for respondents to complete

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct what happened to a specific submitted idea
  • No mechanism to probe leadership follow-through or training gaps beyond fixed questions
  • No published methodology or per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Tool And Process Improvement Survey Template

A fixed-question survey template focused on evaluating tools and process improvement efforts generally. It offers standard survey logic and reporting through SurveyMonkey's platform, but reads as a general opinion survey rather than one designed to trace the fate of individual improvement ideas or quantify time spent on CI work.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools
  • Pre-built template reduces setup time for common process-improvement questions
  • Familiar rating/opinion-scale format for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real recent incident or idea
  • No constant-sum or max-diff style tradeoff questions evident for prioritizing barriers
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

자주 묻는 질문

“Continuous Improvement Program Effectiveness Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 12개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking part! This survey looks at how our continuous improvement process is actually working for you — what's…” · “In the last 3 months, how many process improvement ideas have you submitted, formally or informally?” · “How confident are you that a suggestion you submit will actually get reviewed and acted on?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 12개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

제품 보증 등록 경험 설문조사

고객이 보증 등록을 얼마나 쉽게 완료(또는 중도 포기)하는지, 무엇이 이들을 등록하도록 동기를 부여하는지, 그리고 프로세스가 어디서 문제를 일으키는지 측정합니다. 등록 퍼널을 최적화하는 제품, 고객 관리, CX 팀을 위해 설계되었으며, 응답자가 거의 포기할 뻔했던 정확한 순간을 재구성하는 AI 후속 질문이 포함되어 있습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Employee Recognition Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees are recognized, how fair and meaningful that recognition feels, and whether it comes more from managers or peers. An AI follow-up digs into a specific recent recognition moment to surface what actually made it land — or fall flat — beyond the survey ratings.

템플릿 보기