Mobile App Store Rating Drivers Study
Identifies what actually pushes users toward 5-star versus 1-star app store reviews — crashes, speed, ads, pricing, support — and what specifically would change their rating. Built for product and growth teams; the AI follow-up reconstructs the real incident behind each respondent's rating instead of generic complaints.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how often have you used this app?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- Once a week
- A few times a month
- Rarely, or this is my first time
Have you left a star rating or written review for this app in an app store (Apple App Store or Google Play) in the past 6 months?
- Yes, 5-star
- Yes, 4-star
- Yes, 3-star
- Yes, 2-star or lower
- No, I haven't rated it
If you were to rate this app in the app store right now, what rating would you give it?
How much do you agree with each statement about the app?
- The app is stable and rarely crashes
- The app loads and responds quickly
- Ads or upsell prompts feel excessive
- The price feels fair for what I get
- Customer support resolves issues well
- 외 1개
Which of these changes would move your rating the most, and which the least?
- Fewer crashes and bugs
- Faster performance
- Fewer or less intrusive ads
- Better value for the price
- Faster, more helpful customer support
- Simpler, more intuitive design
- More features I actually need
- Fewer permission or data requests
What, if anything, prompted you to consider leaving an app store rating or review?
- An in-app pop-up asked me to rate it
- I had a frustrating experience I wanted to warn others about
- I had a great experience I wanted to share
- Customer support asked me to leave a review
- I wanted to help other users decide
- I haven't considered leaving a rating
How likely are you to recommend this app to a friend or colleague?
Reconstruct the specific incident behind the respondent's current or most recent rating: what happened, when, and how it made them feel about the app. If they rated it high, find out whether anything almost cost them a star. If they rated it low, dig into whether it was a one-off glitch or a recurring problem, and whether they've actually left that rating publicly or just feel it privately. If they've never rated the app, probe what would need to happen for them to bother.
What's the one change that would most likely turn your rating into a 5-star rating?
Which platform do you primarily use this app on?
- iOS (iPhone/iPad)
- Android
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into a report on what's driving our app store rating, so we can fix what's costing us stars and double down on what's earning them.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs the specific incident behind each respondent's rating instead of relying on generic complaint checkboxes
- Pairs a star rating and rating-scale (recommend likelihood) with a matrix of agreement statements and a best-worst trade-off exercise to rank which changes (crashes, speed, ads, pricing, support) matter most vs least
- Asks directly what prompted the respondent to consider leaving a review, then closes with a open-text question isolating the single change that would flip the rating to 5 stars
- Auto-generates a report from these combined structured and open-ended responses, with transparent prompts so product/growth teams can see exactly how the AI probed each incident
SurveyMonkey
Mobile App Survey Template & QuestionsA ready-to-field static template covering general mobile app satisfaction and usability questions. It's built for broad app feedback rather than specifically diagnosing what drives 1-star vs 5-star app store ratings. Good starting point for general sentiment tracking, but not incident-specific.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template with pre-written mobile app feedback questions
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey logic and distribution tools
- Broad applicability across different app types and use cases
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual respondent incidents
- No mechanism to reconstruct the specific event behind a rating (e.g., which crash, which ad) — relies on generic multiple-choice complaint categories
- No published methodology or prompt transparency since there's no AI-driven questioning involved
QuestionPro
Smiley rating survey questions and sample questionnaire templateThis is a generic rating-scale survey template/guide using smiley-face scales, not one built around app store review dynamics or mobile app usage specifically. It's useful as a reference for simple satisfaction scoring but reads more like a general template guide than an app-store-focused study. Teams would need to heavily customize it to capture crash, speed, ads, pricing, and support drivers.
잘하는 점
- Simple, visual smiley-scale format that's easy for respondents to complete
- Flexible for many use cases beyond app feedback
- Includes sample questionnaire text as a starting reference
아쉬운 점
- Generic satisfaction template, not tailored to app store rating behavior or mobile-specific drivers like crashes/ads/pricing
- No adaptive AI follow-up or incident reconstruction — just static scale questions
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated diagnostic report tied to responses
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Content Strategy Audience Preferences Survey
Identifies which topics, formats, and channels your audience actually wants more of versus what you're currently producing. Combines trade-off methods like MaxDiff and constant-sum allocation with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real content moment — what someone consumed, why they stopped or finished it, and what's missing.
템플릿 보기Email Newsletter Reader Engagement Survey
Measures whether subscribers actually open, skim, or read your newsletter, what content keeps them subscribed, their ideal send frequency, and what pushes them toward unsubscribing. The AI follow-up digs into the real moment a reader almost unsubscribed, not just the stated reason.
템플릿 보기Podcast Listener Feedback & Retention Survey
Captures how listeners actually consume your podcast — ideal episode length, topic preferences, ad tolerance, and what would push them to subscribe or share it — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reason behind their loyalty score instead of a generic satisfaction number.
템플릿 보기로고 및 시각적 아이덴티티 인식 설문조사
일련의 로고 또는 시각적 아이덴티티 옵션이 인지도, 브랜드 적합성, 감정적 톤, 그리고 일대일 선호도 측면에서 어떻게 평가받는지 테스트합니다. 로고 후보군을 비교하거나 리디자인을 평가하는 브랜드 및 마케팅 팀을 위해 제작되었으며, 단순히 순위를 기록하는 것을 넘어 우승 선택을 이끈 구체적인 시각적 단서를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.
템플릿 보기Brand Personality Semantic Differential
Map your brand's personality on classic semantic differential scales — traditional vs. innovative, corporate vs. human, premium vs. affordable — and compare against a competitor. The AI interviewer chases the associations behind the ratings, so you learn where the perception comes from.
템플릿 보기Free Trial Conversion: Value, Blockers & Upgrade Intent Survey
Measures perceived product value, identifies conversion blockers, and assesses upgrade intent among free trial users to inform retention and conversion optimization strategies.
템플릿 보기