Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
My Company as a Place to Work: Employee Experience Pulse
Gauges how employees really feel about working here — recommendation likelihood, day-to-day support, and what would make them stay or leave — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the story behind their score instead of just the number. Built for HR and people teams running a quarterly or annual pulse check.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this company as a place to work to a friend or former colleague?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q03
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience?
6개 행 × 5개 열
- I have the resources and tools I need to do my job well
- I receive recognition for good work
- I understand how my role contributes to the company's goals
- My manager supports my growth and development
- Leadership communicates openly about where the company is headed
- 외 1개
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
From the list below, which factors matter most and least to whether you stay at this company long-term?
- Compensation and benefits
- Career growth opportunities
- Relationship with my manager
- Work-life balance
- Recognition for my work
- Company culture and values
- Job security
- Flexibility (hours, remote work)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to me최악:Matters least to me
Q05
객관식필수
In the last 30 days, how often have you been able to fully disconnect from work outside your scheduled hours?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Q06
의견 척도필수
How likely is it that you'll still be working here 12 months from now?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q07
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score and their 12-month stay likelihood. If the score was low (0-6) or stay likelihood was low, probe for the specific incident or ongoing frustration behind it and what would need to change for that to improve. If the score was high, probe what specifically they'd want the company to protect or not change. Anchor on concrete recent examples, not general sentiment, and ask one clarifying follow-up if their answer is vague.
Q08
장문형
If you could change one thing about working here, what would it be?
Q09
객관식
Which department or team are you part of? (Replace with your own department list before launching. Template note: keep options broad enough to protect anonymity for small teams.)
- Engineering/Product
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People/HR
- Finance
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식
How long have you worked at the company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- 5+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식
What is your employment type?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Contract/Temporary
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
That's everything — thank you for your candor. Responses are aggregated into a confidential report for leadership and HR to identify what's working and where to focus improvements.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Pairs a straightforward recommendation-likelihood score with an AI follow-up interview that actually reconstructs the reasoning behind that score and the respondent's stay/leave calculus, instead of leaving the number unexplained.
- Combines a day-to-day support matrix, a MaxDiff on what most drives staying vs. leaving, and a disconnect-frequency question to triangulate burnout and retention risk from multiple angles, not just one satisfaction score.
- Includes an open 'one thing I'd change' long-text question that the AI can probe further, plus department, tenure, and employment-type breakdowns so HR can segment results without building a separate survey.
- Every AI probe uses a transparent, inspectable prompt and each response gets an automated quality score, so people teams can trust the qualitative data going into the auto-generated report.
QuestionPro
Company Survey: Workplace Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire SampleThis is a sample workplace satisfaction questionnaire with a fixed list of questions rather than an adaptive interview experience. It's a reasonable starting point for a standard HR satisfaction survey, but it reads more like a question bank/guide than a ready-to-field, personalized pulse instrument. Good coverage of general satisfaction themes but no mechanism to dig into individual responses.
잘하는 점
- Established, well-known survey platform with broad question-bank coverage for workplace topics
- Provides a concrete sample questionnaire, useful as a starting reference for HR teams new to pulse surveys
- Backed by a mature survey platform with standard reporting and distribution tools
아쉬운 점
- Static, fixed-question format with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the story behind a low or high score
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI-prompt methodology
- No voice AI interview option or guided task/screen-share capability for deeper qualitative context
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
Retail Store Personality & Brand Character Survey
Measures how shoppers perceive a store's personality — trustworthy, trendy, premium, approachable — and whether that character matches what they actually want. Includes a best-worst trade-off on trait priority and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the mental image customers form of the brand and why.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Secondary Trauma & Compassion Fatigue Check-In
For therapists, social workers, first responders, nurses, and other helping professionals regularly exposed to other people's trauma. Measures exposure levels, secondary traumatic stress symptoms, coping habits, and organizational support gaps, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom rather than relying on abstract self-ratings.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
피트니스 클래스 경험 및 유지 설문조사
회원분들이 저희 피트니스 클래스를 어떻게 경험하시는지 — 강사 자질, 클래스 활력, 스케줄, 그리고 가치 — 그리고 무엇이 계속 방문하시거나 이탈하시게 만드는지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 회원의 만족도와 갱신 가능성 뒤에 숨겨진 진짜 이야기를 파고듭니다. 회원 경험과 이탈 위험을 추적하는 헬스장, 스튜디오, 부티크 피트니스 운영자를 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
B2B Vendor Relationship Resilience During the Pandemic
Assesses how a specific vendor, supplier, or business partner performed during pandemic-era disruptions — reliability, communication, pricing, and flexibility — and which changes have stuck since. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident that made or broke trust, going beyond the overall rating to the moment that mattered.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Organizational SWOT Analysis Survey
Collects structured input from employees and leaders on your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, then uses a trade-off exercise and an AI follow-up interview to surface which single factor matters most right now and why. Built for strategy teams prepping a SWOT before a planning cycle or board review.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Resort Stay Experience Evaluation Survey
Captures how guests rate every stage of a resort stay — booking, check-in, rooms, amenities, staff, and value — and benchmarks loyalty with a recommendation score. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moments that drove each guest's score, surfacing what turned a detractor sour or what would push a passive guest into a promoter. Built for resort GMs and hospitality research teams.
템플릿 보기