Operations Support Service Quality & NPS Survey
Measures internal stakeholder satisfaction with operations support across resolution speed, communication quality, and professionalism, with NPS benchmarking. Designed for recurring deployment to track service improvement over time.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How many times did you interact with the Operations team in the past 30 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11 or more
Was your request resolved on the first attempt?
- Yes
- No
- Not applicable
Approximately how many back-and-forth exchanges occurred before your request was resolved?
- 0 (resolved immediately)
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11 or more
How would you rate the overall professionalism of the Operations staff you interacted with?
Please rank the following aspects by importance when working with Operations (1 = most important).
- Speed of resolution
- Clear communication
- Accuracy and quality of solution
- Professional demeanor
- Ownership and accountability
What is one change that would most improve your experience with Operations support?
What is your primary department or function?
- Product / Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Finance
- HR
- Operations
- Customer Support
- Legal / Compliance
- Other
Thank you for your time — your feedback helps us continuously improve Operations support. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. You may close this window now.
Which channel did you primarily use for your most recent interaction?
- Ticketing system
- Chat / IM
- Phone
- In person
- Other
Approximately how long did it take to resolve your request?
- Same day
- 1–2 business days
- 3–5 business days
- 6–10 business days
- More than 10 business days
- Still unresolved
How satisfied were you with the timeliness of updates and status communications?
Which of the following behaviors did you observe during your interaction? Select all that apply.
- Courteous and respectful
- Listens actively
- Explains decisions clearly
- Solution-oriented
- Took ownership
- Seemed rushed
- Dismissive
- Used heavy jargon (hard to follow)
- None of the above
How likely are you to recommend the Operations team to a colleague?
We'd like to understand your experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses.
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Director / Executive
- Other
Which of the following best describes the type of request?
- Access or permissions
- Incident or break/fix
- Service request
- How-to or guidance
- Change request
- Other (please specify)
How satisfied were you with the speed at which your request was resolved?
How satisfied were you with the clarity of the information provided?
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
How would you describe the urgency of this request?
- Routine (no specific deadline)
- Time-sensitive (needed within a few days)
- Urgent (same-day or next-day needed)
How satisfied were you with how proactively the team kept you informed?
Where are you primarily located?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview block that lets respondents elaborate in depth on their resolution or communication experience, something static form templates can't replicate
- Combines quantitative opinion-scale ratings on speed, communication, and professionalism with a dedicated NPS-style 'likelihood to recommend' question for benchmarking
- Captures process-level context (channel used, urgency, back-and-forth exchanges, first-contact resolution) so low scores can be diagnosed rather than just reported
- Ends with an open-text improvement question plus segmentation by department, role level, tenure, and location, enabling recurring deployment and trend tracking across stakeholder groups
Jotform
College Facility & Support Service Satisfaction Form TemplateThis is a static, fielding-ready form aimed at college facility and support service satisfaction rather than internal operations support for staff. It covers general service satisfaction themes but isn't built for recurring internal stakeholder NPS tracking. Useful as a structural reference for satisfaction-form layout, not a direct match for internal ops support use cases.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-deploy drag-and-drop form builder with no setup needed
- Simple, familiar layout for quick satisfaction feedback collection
- Part of a large template library so it's easy to customize fields
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing based on responses
- No built-in NPS benchmarking or per-response quality scoring
- No transparent methodology or AI moderation of open-ended answers
QuestionPro
Customer Support Service Evaluation Survey TemplateA template built for evaluating external customer support interactions rather than internal operations stakeholders, but it overlaps on core themes like resolution and service quality. It's a ready-to-use static survey template, not an adaptive interview experience. Good for basic recurring satisfaction pulses but limited in diagnostic depth.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad reporting and analytics tooling
- Pre-built structure covering common support-quality dimensions
- Supports recurring survey deployment across customer touchpoints
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning — all questions are fixed in advance
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No published per-response quality scoring methodology
SurveySparrow
Service Quality Questionnaire TemplateA general-purpose service quality feedback template that could be adapted for internal support teams, though it's framed generically rather than specifically for internal operations stakeholders with NPS benchmarking. It's a static, conversational-style form rather than an AI-moderated interview. Suitable for quick recurring pulse checks but not deep qualitative probing.
잘하는 점
- Conversational form style that improves completion experience
- Reusable template designed for recurring feedback collection
- Simple scaled questions covering core service-quality dimensions
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviews — question flow is predetermined
- No automated per-response scoring or quality flagging
- No voice-based interview modality for richer qualitative feedback
자주 묻는 질문
“Operations Support Service Quality & NPS Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 23개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the Operations Support Feedback Survey. We want to understand your recent experience working with the Operati…” · “How many times did you interact with the Operations team in the past 30 days?” · “Was your request resolved on the first attempt?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 23개를 약 10분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Internal Knowledge Findability & Trust Audit
Assesses how employees find, evaluate, and trust internal knowledge resources—measuring findability, content quality, ownership clarity, and tool effectiveness to prioritize knowledge management improvements.
템플릿 보기지원 상호작용 후 CSAT, CES 및 NPS 설문조사
지원 상호작용 직후 고객의 노력, 만족도, 충성도를 측정합니다. 3분 이내에 실행 가능한 CSAT, CES, NPS 벤치마크를 확보하고자 하는 CX 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Post-Support CSAT & Resolution Quality Survey
Measures customer satisfaction, resolution effectiveness, agent performance, and customer effort after a support interaction to identify actionable service improvements.
템플릿 보기Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey (NPS + CSAT)
Measures patient satisfaction across appointment scheduling, provider interaction quality, and health technology reliability using NPS and CSAT frameworks. Designed for clinics and health systems seeking actionable improvement data.
템플릿 보기Net Promoter Score (NPS) 고객 경험 설문조사
고객 충성도를 전반적인 만족도와 함께 측정하기 위한 방법론적으로 견고한 NPS 설문조사입니다. 상호작용 이후 또는 정기적 실시를 위해 설계되었으며, promoter, passive, detractor를 식별하고 고객 경험의 실행 가능한 동인을 발견하는 데 활용됩니다.
템플릿 보기Restaurant Guest Satisfaction & NPS Survey
Measures guest satisfaction across food quality, service, ambiance, and value while capturing Net Promoter Score. Designed for restaurant operators seeking to identify loyalty drivers and prioritize operational improvements.
템플릿 보기