Pre-Market Listing Strategy Effectiveness Survey
Captures how sellers experienced the pre-market or 'coming soon' phase before their home went live on the open MLS — buyer interest, pricing signals, and agent support — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs why offers did or didn't materialize during that window. Built for real estate agents and brokerages deciding whether to keep offering a pre-market strategy.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What was the primary reason you chose a pre-market (coming soon) period before your home was fully listed on the open MLS?
- Test buyer interest without a public days-on-market count
- Get ahead of competing listings coming soon
- Refine the listing price based on early feedback
- Give more time for marketing materials and staging
- My agent recommended it and I went along with it
- Other
How satisfied were you with the level of buyer interest (inquiries, showing requests) during the pre-market period?
Did you receive any offers while the property was still in pre-market status?
- Yes, and we accepted one
- Yes, but we didn't accept any
- No offers received
- Not sure / don't recall
How much do you agree with each statement about your pre-market experience?
- The listing price felt right when we went live
- My agent gave me clear guidance on timing and next steps
- Marketing materials (photos, description) were ready before the pre-market launch
- Showing feedback from interested buyers was shared with me quickly
How would you rate your agent's communication during the pre-market phase?
Thinking back on your decision, split 100 points across these factors based on how much each one influenced your choice to use a pre-market period.
- Avoiding a long public days-on-market count
- Testing whether the asking price was right
- Building early buzz before the public launch
- Giving my agent time to prepare marketing
- Other reasons
How likely are you to recommend a pre-market (coming soon) listing strategy to another home seller?
Reconstruct what actually happened during this seller's pre-market period, anchoring on whether they received offers. If they received an offer, probe what made them accept or decline it and how it compared to their price expectations. If they received no offers, probe what they believe held buyers back — price, condition, marketing, timing — and whether the price was adjusted before the public launch. Close by asking what one change would have made the pre-market phase more valuable.
Did the pre-market period change the price at which you ultimately listed on the open market?
- We increased the price
- We decreased the price
- We kept the same price
- The home sold before it reached the open market
- Not applicable
What, if anything, would have made the pre-market period more valuable to you as a seller?
Just two quick optional questions about you, then we're done.
What price range was your home listed in?
- Under $250,000
- $250,000 - $499,999
- $500,000 - $749,999
- $750,000 - $999,999
- $1,000,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback helps agents decide when and how to use pre-market listings, and your answers will be reviewed alongside other sellers' experiences, not shared individually.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs why offers did or didn't materialize during the pre-market window, going beyond static questions to probe seller reasoning in real time.
- Combines a constant-sum question (splitting 100 points across decision factors) and an agreement matrix to capture nuanced tradeoffs, not just single-scale ratings.
- Pairs a satisfaction opinion scale and recommendation likelihood score with a dedicated agent-communication rating, giving brokerages a full picture of both market response and agent performance.
- Automated quality scoring and auto-generated reports turn seller responses into decision-ready insight for agents/brokerages weighing whether to keep offering pre-market listings.
Jotform
Condo Pre-Market Listing Questionnaire Form TemplateA static, fielding-ready form template scoped to condo pre-market listings rather than single-family homes broadly. It relies on fixed questions with no follow-up logic to explore why a seller's outcome played out the way it did.
잘하는 점
- Quick to deploy within Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
- Part of a large template library with common form integrations
- Condo-specific framing may suit niche brokerages
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why offers did or didn't materialize
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice AI interview option
SurveySparrow
Pre-Market Listing Questionnaire TemplateA conversational-style survey template covering the pre-market listing experience, built on SurveySparrow's chat-like form format. It's a fixed question set aimed at general feedback collection rather than reconstructing seller decision drivers.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style question flow improves completion feel
- Easy to customize and brand for a real estate business
- Straightforward to launch without setup overhead
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into why offers stalled or converted
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent published prompt methodology behind question logic
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Company Holiday Celebration Planning Survey
Gathers employee preferences on format, timing, budget priorities, and inclusivity for your company holiday celebration, plus a rating of intent to attend this year. An AI follow-up interview digs into why people would or wouldn't show up, so planners can fix the real barriers instead of guessing.
템플릿 보기프로그램 및 세션 참가자 피드백 설문
참가자가 워크숍, 교육 또는 프로그램을 어떻게 경험했는지 — 만족도, 특정 세션의 인지된 가치, 재참여 가능성 — 를 파악하고, 평가의 이유를 깊이 있게 탐구하는 AI 후속 질문과 결합하여 주최자가 다음번에 무엇을 유지하고, 고치고, 또는 없애야 할지 정확히 알 수 있도록 합니다.
템플릿 보기Laboratory Technician Competency Self-Assessment
Evaluates lab staff's confidence and proficiency across core bench skills, SOP adherence, and equipment troubleshooting, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent error or near-miss to surface real training gaps behind the self-ratings. Built for lab managers and QA leads running periodic competency reviews.
템플릿 보기Softball Tryout Player Evaluation Scorecard
A structured scorecard for coaches and scouts to rate a player's hitting, fielding, throwing, speed, and coachability right after a tryout, plus a roster recommendation. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific plays or moments behind that recommendation so the reasoning isn't lost once the tryout ends.
템플릿 보기Post-Vaccination Experience and Side Effect Tracker
Tracks how patients felt in the days after a vaccination — side effect severity, how well staff set expectations, and overall satisfaction — for clinics, pharmacies, and health systems monitoring vaccine programs. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened physically and logistically for patients with rougher experiences, going beyond a checkbox symptom list.
템플릿 보기Post-Presentation Audience Feedback Survey
Captures how a presentation, talk, or webinar landed with its audience — clarity, pacing, relevance, and delivery — for presenters, event teams, and internal comms who want to improve the next session. An AI follow-up digs into the exact moment attention was lost or a point clicked, going beyond generic satisfaction scores.
템플릿 보기