Private Label vs Premium Splurge Trade-Off Survey
Measures where budget-pressured shoppers trade down to store brands and where they still splurge on premium products, using a best-worst trade-off exercise and a budget-allocation task to map real priorities. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the last splurge purchase to uncover the emotional vs. practical logic behind when 'worth it' actually wins. Built for CPG, retail, and pricing teams.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 3 months, has your household changed how much you spend on everyday groceries and household goods because of price increases or budget pressure?
- Yes, cut back significantly
- Yes, cut back a little
- No real change
- Actually spending more freely
Which of these categories have you switched from name-brand to store-brand or private label products in the last 3 months?
- Grocery staples (pasta, rice, canned goods)
- Snacks & beverages
- Personal care (shampoo, soap, etc.)
- Household cleaning supplies
- Over-the-counter medicine
- Baby or child products
- Pet food or supplies
Even while cutting back elsewhere, which of these do you still splurge on name-brand or premium versions of?
- Coffee
- Skincare or beauty products
- Alcohol
- Specialty or gourmet food
- Clothing or apparel
- Electronics or tech
- Restaurant or takeout meals
When you do choose a store-brand or private label product over a name-brand one, which of these reasons matters most and least to you?
- It's noticeably cheaper
- Quality is basically the same
- I don't trust the brand name enough to pay more for it
- It was recommended by someone I trust
- It's what was in stock or available
- I tried it out of curiosity and it worked out
- The packaging or store display caught my attention
How much do you agree with each statement about store-brand products?
- Store-brand products perform as well as name-brand equivalents
- I feel a little self-conscious buying store-brand in front of others
- Store-brand packaging looks cheaper than name-brand
- I'd recommend store-brand alternatives to a friend
- Price is the only reason I buy store-brand
If you had $100 in discretionary (non-essential) spending this month, how would you divide it across these categories?
- Groceries or food at home
- Dining out or takeout
- Personal care & beauty
- Clothing & apparel
- Entertainment & subscriptions
- Treats or small indulgences (coffee, snacks, etc.)
If a premium brand you've switched away from lowered its price to match the store-brand alternative, how likely would you be to switch back?
Ask the respondent to walk through the last time they bought their premium 'splurge' item — the one they still buy despite cutting back elsewhere: what triggered the purchase, how they felt, and whether they considered a cheaper alternative first. If they said they've cut back on everything, probe for the last small indulgence they allowed themselves and what made it feel justified. Anchor on the trade-off logic they use to decide when paying more is 'worth it' versus when it isn't.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the store-brand or private label products you've tried as replacements?
Which best describes your household's total annual income?
- Under $30,000
- $30,000-$59,999
- $60,000-$99,999
- $100,000-$149,999
- $150,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
How many people live in your household, including yourself?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 or more
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for sharing how you're navigating your budget! Your answers help us understand where value-consciousness and premium spending coexist, and feed directly into a report on category-level trade-off behavior.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Uses a best-worst trade-off exercise and a $100 budget-allocation task to map which categories shoppers actually trade down on versus protect
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's last premium 'splurge' purchase to surface the emotional vs. practical reasoning behind 'worth it' moments
- Pairs attitudinal matrix and satisfaction ratings on store-brand products with a price-parity opinion question to test brand switching elasticity
- Captures household income, size, and age demographics alongside behavior data so CPG and pricing teams can segment trade-off patterns by budget pressure
자주 묻는 질문
“Private Label vs Premium Splurge Trade-Off Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 14개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to talk about your grocery and shopping habits lately. Your responses are completely con…” · “In the last 3 months, has your household changed how much you spend on everyday groceries and household goods because of…” · “Which of these categories have you switched from name-brand to store-brand or private label products in the last 3 month…”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 14개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Fiber, Protein & Gut Health Claims Credibility Study
Measures how much shoppers trust functional food and beverage claims around fiber, protein, and gut health/probiotics, what evidence makes a claim believable, and where skepticism creeps in. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific claim the respondent doubted or trusted and reconstructs what actually changed their mind. Built for brand, insights, and regulatory teams evaluating label and marketing language.
템플릿 보기Budget Allocation & Priority Trade-Off Survey
Give stakeholders 100 points and make them spend it: constant-sum allocation across initiatives forces the prioritization that agree-scale surveys hide. Follow-up questions capture what they'd cut entirely, and the AI interviewer pressure-tests their biggest bet.
템플릿 보기슈퍼마켓 선택 기준 및 쇼핑객 충성도 설문
쇼핑객이 특정 슈퍼마켓을 선택하고 계속 이용하게 만드는 실제 요인 — 가격, 신선도, 편의성, 리워드 — 을 밝혀냅니다. 최선-최악 상충 관계 연습, 만족도 배터리, 그리고 최근의 매장 전환 또는 전환 고민의 실제 이야기를 재구성하는 AI 후속 인터뷰를 활용합니다. 식료품 소매 및 카테고리 인사이트 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Supermarket Shopping Attitudes and Habits Survey
Captures how shoppers choose, evaluate, and switch between grocery stores and channels — price sensitivity, loyalty behavior, and channel mix — for retail and CPG researchers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind a shopper's most recent store choice or channel switch, beyond what a closed question can capture.
템플릿 보기Discount and Promotion Sensitivity Survey
Measures how deal-driven your customers really are: what triggers a discount-motivated purchase, whether frequent promotions erode brand perception, and how willing shoppers are to pay full price. An AI follow-up reconstructs the last purchase decision they made under a discount to separate genuine price sensitivity from habit.
템플릿 보기Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Survey
Maps how a target market perceives a product or service's price using the four classic price-sensitivity questions, then layers in purchase intent, feature value trade-offs, and a budget allocation exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each respondent's expensive/cheap thresholds so pricing teams get the numbers and the 'why' behind them.
템플릿 보기