Sales & Revenue

Product Demo Request Feedback Survey

Captures how prospects experienced a sales demo they requested — fit to their use case, rep quality, and purchase intent — for sales and revenue teams refining demo delivery. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real objections and decision process behind the ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a demo with us! We'd love your honest take on how it went — this helps us make demos more useful for people like you. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02

객관식필수

What best describes why you requested this demo?

Actively looking to replace a current solution
Researching options for a new need
Curious after seeing content/ads
Asked to evaluate by a colleague or manager
Comparing us against a shortlist of vendors

Q03

의견 척도필수

How well did the demo address your specific use case?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not addressed at all최대:Addressed perfectly

Q04

매트릭스필수

Rate the following aspects of the demo you attended:

5개 행 × 5개 열

Presenter's product knowledge
Relevance of the examples shown
Pacing (not too rushed or too slow)
Handling of your questions
Promptness of any follow-up since the demo

열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent

Q05

의견 척도필수

Based on this demo, how likely are you to move forward with (Replace with Company Name)?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q06

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When deciding on a solution like this, which factors matter most and least to you?

Price and total cost of ownership
Breadth of features
Ease of use for the team
Quality of customer support
Integration with existing tools
Security and compliance
Vendor reputation and reviews
Speed of implementation

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least

Q07

객관식필수

Which best describes where you are in evaluating a solution like this?

Just started researching
Actively comparing a few vendors
Finalizing a decision soon
On hold or paused for now
Already decided against moving forward

Q08

객관식

Are you evaluating any other vendors alongside us?

(Replace with Competitor A)
(Replace with Competitor B)
(Replace with Competitor C)

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Explore the real story behind their likelihood-to-proceed rating: if it was low or middling, probe for the specific objection or blocker (price, missing feature, internal buy-in, timing) and whether it's a dealbreaker or something that could be resolved. If it was high, confirm what would need to happen next to actually close the deal and by when. Anchor on their own use case rather than generic praise or criticism.

Q10

장문형

What, if anything, would need to change for this to be an easy yes?

Q11

객관식

How many employees does your organization have?

1-10
11-50
51-200
201-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,000+
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

Which best describes your role in this purchase decision?

Final decision-maker
Influencer/recommender
Technical evaluator
End user
Not directly involved
Prefer not to say

Q13

메시지

That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Your responses go directly to our sales and product teams to make demos more relevant and helpful.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Pairs a straightforward opinion-scale and matrix rating of the demo (use-case fit, rep quality, overall aspects) with an AI follow-up interview that actually asks *why* the likelihood-to-proceed score was low or high — surfacing real objections static forms never reach.
Maps the buyer's full decision context with dedicated questions on evaluation stage, competing vendors, company size, and purchase-decision role, so sales teams know exactly who they're talking to.
Uses a max-diff exercise to rank which factors (price, features, support, etc.) matter most and least to the prospect, plus an open-ended 'what would need to change for this to be an easy yes' question for concrete, actionable qualitative detail.
Automatically compiles ratings, rankings, and interview transcripts into a report for revenue teams — no manual synthesis required.

Typeform

Demo Feedback Form Template

This is a genuinely comparable post-demo feedback template, using Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time conversational format. It covers basic satisfaction and rating fields but is a fixed, fielding-ready form rather than an adaptive interview — every respondent sees the same static questions regardless of their answers.

잘하는 점

Clean, conversational one-at-a-time question flow that's known to boost completion rates
Easy to customize visually and quick to launch without technical setup
Mobile-friendly and simple to embed or share via link

아쉬운 점

No adaptive follow-up questioning — can't dig into why a prospect gave a particular rating or what their real objection was
No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report
No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability

자주 묻는 질문