QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Product & UX

Product Development Team Effectiveness Check

A team health survey for product, design, and engineering members that measures process clarity, cross-functional collaboration, time allocation, and the biggest blockers to shipping — with an AI follow-up that digs into a real recent example behind the top-ranked blocker instead of settling for a vague complaint.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this one! We're checking in on how our product development team is actually working — process, collaboration, and what's getting in the way. Honest answers help us fix real problems. About 6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What's your primary role on the product development team?

  • Product manager
  • Engineer
  • Designer
  • QA / test
  • Data / analytics
  • Other
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about how your team currently operates?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Priorities for the current sprint/cycle are clear
  • Roles and responsibilities are well defined
  • Standups/syncs are a good use of time
  • Technical documentation is sufficient to work independently
  • Deadlines are realistic given the scope of work
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

How clear is the current product roadmap to you?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q05
평점 척도필수

In the last month, how would you rate collaboration between product, design, and engineering on your team?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q06
점수 배분필수

Thinking about a typical work week, how do you actually split your time across these activities? Allocate 100 points total.

  • Building/coding new features
  • Meetings & coordination
  • Fixing bugs / technical debt
  • Planning & requirements
  • User research / testing
100점 배분
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these get in the way of your team shipping quality product the most, and which get in the way the least?

  • Unclear requirements
  • Too many meetings
  • Frequent scope changes mid-cycle
  • Accumulated technical debt
  • Not enough time for testing
  • Poor handoffs between roles
  • Lack of user research input
  • Shifting priorities mid-cycle
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Biggest blocker최악:Smallest blocker
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the blocker the respondent ranked as biggest: ask for a specific, recent example of when it actually slowed the team down or hurt quality, what the root cause was, and what would have prevented it. If their matrix answers showed disagreement on priorities or deadlines, connect the blocker back to that. Push past generic answers like 'communication' to a concrete process or decision they can point to.

Q09
순위 매기기

Rank these team rituals from most to least valuable for how you actually do your work.

  1. Daily standup/sync
  2. Sprint or cycle planning
  3. Retrospective
  4. Demo/showcase
  5. 1:1s with manager
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q10
장문형

What's one change that would make the biggest difference to how your team works together?

Q11
객관식

How long have you been on this product development team?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many people are on your immediate product development team?

  • 2–4
  • 5–8
  • 9–15
  • 16 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Responses are pooled anonymously and shared with team leads to shape the next round of process changes.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that targets whichever blocker the respondent ranked highest and pushes for a specific, recent example instead of accepting a vague complaint
  • Pairs quantitative measures — a matrix of agreement statements, an opinion scale on roadmap clarity, a rating of cross-functional collaboration, and a constant-sum split of how time is actually spent — with qualitative depth from the AI probe and an open-ended change request
  • Asks respondents to rank team rituals by actual value and asks directly what one change would make the biggest difference, giving teams prioritized, actionable input rather than just satisfaction scores
  • Captures role, tenure, and team size as context for segmentation, and tells respondents up front that responses are pooled anonymously before results are shared

SurveyMonkey

Product Development Team Health Check Template

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template covering team health for product development groups, matching QuestionPunk's audience and general intent. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's broad brand recognition, established survey-building tools, and standard analytics/reporting dashboards. It is a static questionnaire, so any 'digging deeper' on open responses would require manual follow-up rather than being built into the survey flow.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, established survey platform with a mature template library
  • Likely includes standard question types (rating, multiple choice, open text) suited to team health checks
  • Built-in analytics and reporting dashboard for aggregating results

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the specific blocker a respondent flags as most important — follow-up would require manual review
  • No automated per-response quality scoring to flag low-effort or vague answers
  • No published methodology on how questions or scoring logic were designed, and no voice AI interview option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Product & UX

Feature Request Deep-Dive Survey

Captures a specific feature request in the requester's own words, gauges how urgent and impactful it would be, and benchmarks it against other candidate ideas using a best-worst trade-off exercise. Built for product teams triaging inbound requests, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact workflow the feature would unblock and what the person does today without it.

템플릿 보기
Product & UX

웹사이트 문의 경험 설문조사

방문자가 웹사이트의 문의 채널(양식, 이메일, 채팅, 전화)을 얼마나 쉽게 찾고 사용하며 답변을 받는지를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 혼란스럽거나 지연되었던 구체적인 순간을 심층적으로 살펴봅니다.

템플릿 보기
Product & UX

Website Design & Usability Feedback Survey

Measures how easily visitors navigate your site, how the visual design lands, and which design elements most need work — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment a visitor got confused or stuck instead of just a satisfaction score. Built for product, UX, and marketing teams evaluating a live site or redesign.

템플릿 보기
Product & UX

웹사이트 사용성 및 만족도 평가

방문자가 웹사이트에서 원하는 것을 얼마나 쉽게 수행하는지, 속도·탐색·디자인·신뢰도 측면에서 사이트가 어떻게 평가되는지, 그리고 추천 의향이 얼마나 되는지를 측정합니다. 또한 AI 후속 질문을 통해 혼란스럽거나 문제가 발생한 정확한 순간을 심층적으로 파악합니다. 정기적인 사이트 상태 점검을 수행하는 제품, UX, 마케팅 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Product & UX

Mobile App Store Rating Drivers Study

Identifies what actually pushes users toward 5-star versus 1-star app store reviews — crashes, speed, ads, pricing, support — and what specifically would change their rating. Built for product and growth teams; the AI follow-up reconstructs the real incident behind each respondent's rating instead of generic complaints.

템플릿 보기
Product & UX

System Usability Scale (SUS) with AI Debrief

The standard 10-item SUS questionnaire, scored 0–100 and benchmarkable against decades of published research — with correct alternating positive/negative wording preserved. An AI debrief interview follows the score, so you learn what to fix, not just where you stand.

템플릿 보기