QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation

Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest answers help us fix real problems, not just track scores. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes and your individual answers won't be shared with teammates.

Q02
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your team today?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Team members communicate openly about problems
  • We hold each other accountable for commitments
  • Decisions get made without unnecessary delay
  • Workload is distributed fairly across the team
  • I trust my teammates to do their part well
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective is your team at getting its work done?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q04
객관식필수

In the last month, what has been the single biggest obstacle to your team's performance?

  • Unclear priorities or goals
  • Poor communication between members
  • Uneven workload distribution
  • Slow or unclear decision-making
  • Lack of recognition or low morale
  • Insufficient resources or tools
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If you could only fix a few of these about the team, which would matter most versus least?

  • Clearer role definitions
  • Faster decision-making
  • More recognition for good work
  • Better meeting efficiency
  • More balanced workloads
  • Stronger cross-team communication
  • More access to tools or resources
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most impactful to improve최악:Least impactful to improve
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through a specific, recent example of the obstacle they flagged as biggest — what happened, who was involved, and how it played out. If they rated any team-health statement low (disagree or strongly disagree), probe why that specific one, whether it's new or long-standing, and what a fix would concretely look like. Push past vague answers like 'communication is bad' to get a real scenario.

Q07
평점 척도

How well does your manager support the team in removing obstacles to good work?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all supportive최대:Extremely supportive
Q08
장문형

What's one thing this team should stop doing in order to work better together?

Q09
객관식

How long have you been part of this team?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-12 months
  • 1-3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
드롭다운

How many people are on this team, including you?

  • 2-4
  • 5-8
  • 9-15
  • 16 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Responses across the team will be summarized to identify shared themes and shape concrete changes, not to single anyone out.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static satisfaction score with a matrix and rating block, then uses an AI follow-up interview to ask respondents to walk through a specific, recent example of whatever obstacle or low score they flagged — so you get the real story, not just the number.
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to force prioritization of what to fix first, paired with an open long-text question on what the team should stop doing, giving both ranked and qualitative signal.
  • Includes context questions (tenure on team, team size) so results can be segmented, plus manager-support rating to separate individual contributor experience from leadership performance.
  • Auto-generates a report from the mix of scaled, ranked, and open-ended responses, and every AI probe uses a transparent, inspectable prompt rather than a black-box script.

Jotform

Team Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at general team evaluation. It's a static fielding-ready template rather than an interview experience, with no mention of adaptive questioning or built-in analysis of open-ended answers.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy with an easy drag-and-drop editor
  • Broad template library and integrations typical of Jotform
  • Free to start using

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the story behind a low score or named obstacle
  • No voice interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated narrative report

SurveySparrow

Team Evaluation Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template positioned for employee/team evaluation, in line with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It's a pre-built template for direct fielding, but the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptive to individual answers.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that feels more human than a grid form
  • Built for employee-experience use cases
  • Template is ready to launch without custom build work

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI that generates a unique follow-up question based on each respondent's specific obstacle
  • No voice AI interview mode
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how any open-text answers are handled

Typeform

Free Team Evaluation Form Template

A free, ready-to-use conversational form template on Typeform's standard form platform. It's polished for one-question-at-a-time completion and branching logic, but is still a fixed-question template rather than a dynamic interview.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, guided one-question-at-a-time flow known for high completion rates
  • Free tier available to start immediately
  • Conditional logic for branching by answer

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-generated follow-up that digs into a specific recent example of a flagged obstacle
  • No guided task or screen-share capability
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

QuestionPro

Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily an individual performance-evaluation template and question bank on an enterprise survey platform, not a team-collaboration-specific instrument. It's usable as a fielding template but reads more like a general reference/sample questionnaire page than a team-health-check tool.

잘하는 점

  • Large enterprise survey feature set (logic, reporting dashboards, multi-channel distribution)
  • Sample questions cover broad performance dimensions
  • Established platform with extensive customization options

아쉬운 점

  • Focused on individual performance rather than team communication/workload dynamics specifically
  • No adaptive AI interview that follows up on a respondent's specific obstacle
  • No voice AI interview or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Workplace Language Proficiency Self-Assessment Survey

Assesses how employees or candidates actually use a target language on the job — across speaking, listening, reading, and writing — for HR, L&D, and global teams making staffing or training decisions, with an AI follow-up interview that stress-tests self-reported confidence against a real recent high-stakes work conversation.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Anonymous Employee Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey

A confidential pulse check on communication, recognition, workload, and trust in leadership — for HR and people teams who want honest signal without retaliation fears. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's lowest-rated area, surfacing specifics that a number alone never would.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

면접 후 지원자 평가 스코어카드

면접관이 스크리닝, 패널, 또는 온사이트 라운드 직후에 지원자를 평가할 수 있도록 구성된 스코어카드입니다 — 핵심 역량, 두드러진 강점, 채용 추천을 다룹니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 경계선 점수 뒤의 근거를 파고들어, 채용 위원회가 단순한 숫자가 아닌 실제 증거를 확보할 수 있도록 돕습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check

Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Online Dating App Experience & Match Quality Survey

Measures how people actually experience dating apps and sites — match quality, trust, safety, and what drives satisfaction — for dating product teams and researchers. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent match or date instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Likert Scale Statement Agreement Survey

A flexible agree-disagree battery for measuring attitudes toward a product, policy, workplace practice, or service — built around a classic multi-statement rating grid. Swap in your own statements, then let the AI follow-up dig into the reasoning behind whichever statement swayed the respondent's opinion most, closed or neutral answers included.

템플릿 보기