Feature Request Deep-Dive Survey
Captures a specific feature request in the requester's own words, gauges how urgent and impactful it would be, and benchmarks it against other candidate ideas using a best-worst trade-off exercise. Built for product teams triaging inbound requests, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact workflow the feature would unblock and what the person does today without it.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which part of the product is your feature request about?
- (Replace with Product Area A, e.g., Reporting)
- (Replace with Product Area B, e.g., Integrations)
- (Replace with Product Area C, e.g., Mobile App)
- Not sure / general
Describe the feature you'd like to see. What would it do, and what problem would it solve for you?
In the last 30 days, how have you been getting this done without the feature?
- I use a workaround inside the product
- I use a separate/third-party tool
- I do it manually outside any tool
- I haven't been able to do it at all
- This is a brand-new need I haven't tried to solve before
If we built this feature exactly as you described, how much would it improve your day-to-day experience with (Replace with Product Name)?
How urgently do you need this feature?
Here are several potential features we're considering. For each set shown, pick the one you'd want most and the one you'd want least. (Template note: replace this list with your own shortlist of candidate features before launching.)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 1)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 2)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 3)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 4)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 5)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 6)
- (Replace with Feature Idea 7)
If this feature shipped, how would it affect your likelihood of continuing to use (Replace with Product Name)?
- Much more likely to continue/upgrade
- Somewhat more likely
- No change
- Somewhat less likely
- Much less likely
Reconstruct the exact workflow behind this request: what the respondent was trying to do right before they wished this feature existed, what they did instead, and what it cost them (time, errors, a missed deadline). If they rated the improvement as low or said it's not urgent, probe whether the feature idea itself is the problem or whether the underlying need is already being met another way. Anchor follow-ups on the specific words they used in their feature description rather than generic satisfaction language.
What's your role?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director/VP
- C-level/Founder
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How many people work at your company?
- 1-10
- 11-50
- 51-200
- 201-1,000
- 1,000+
- Prefer not to say
That's everything - thank you! Your request and priorities go straight into our product roadmap review, and the AI follow-up helps us understand exactly what to build.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Captures the feature request in the requester's own words via an open-ended description question, then uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the exact workflow the feature would unblock and what they do today without it
- Quantifies urgency and expected impact separately (opinion scale for improvement, rating for urgency) rather than relying on a single vague priority field
- Benchmarks the request against other candidate features using a best-worst max-diff exercise, so product teams get relative prioritization data, not just isolated feedback
- Ties the request to churn risk and account context (likelihood to continue using the product, role, company size) so triage can weigh strategic accounts appropriately
Jotform
Feature Request Form TemplateA static, fielding-ready form for collecting feature suggestions with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder and standard field types. It's built for quick intake rather than structured prioritization or trade-off analysis. No mechanism for probing deeper into a specific request's context.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Easy integration with Jotform's wider form ecosystem (notifications, spreadsheets, apps)
- Simple to deploy for basic intake without configuration overhead
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the requester's actual workflow or current workaround
- No built-in method for benchmarking one request against other candidate features
- No automated per-response quality scoring or generated prioritization report
SurveyMonkey
Feature Request TemplateA standard survey template for gathering feature suggestions, backed by SurveyMonkey's broader analytics and reporting suite. It focuses on structured multiple-choice and rating questions rather than open-ended workflow reconstruction. Best suited to lightweight feedback collection rather than deep prioritization exercises.
잘하는 점
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey analytics and dashboard reporting
- Familiar respondent experience with broad completion-rate benchmarking data
- Easy to combine with SurveyMonkey's audience panel for distribution
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question flow with no adaptive AI interview to dig into the specific problem or workaround behind a request
- No native best-worst trade-off exercise to compare requests against each other
- No transparent, published follow-up prompt methodology
Typeform
Feature Request FormA conversational, one-question-at-a-time form template well suited to a pleasant intake experience. It focuses on presentation and flow rather than structured impact scoring or cross-request benchmarking. Good for lightweight collection, less suited to product teams needing prioritization data.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface that Typeform is known for
- Strong visual/branding customization for a pleasant respondent experience
- Simple logic jumps for basic branching
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to reconstruct the requester's workflow or current workaround
- No max-diff or similar mechanism to rank a request against other candidate ideas
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated triage report
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
웹사이트 문의 경험 설문조사
방문자가 웹사이트의 문의 채널(양식, 이메일, 채팅, 전화)을 얼마나 쉽게 찾고 사용하며 답변을 받는지를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 혼란스럽거나 지연되었던 구체적인 순간을 심층적으로 살펴봅니다.
템플릿 보기Website Design & Usability Feedback Survey
Measures how easily visitors navigate your site, how the visual design lands, and which design elements most need work — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment a visitor got confused or stuck instead of just a satisfaction score. Built for product, UX, and marketing teams evaluating a live site or redesign.
템플릿 보기Website Intercept: Task Success & Friction Survey
A short on-site pop-up survey that captures why a visitor came, whether they accomplished their task, and where they hit friction — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment things went wrong instead of relying on a vague satisfaction score. Built for UX and product teams running always-on site feedback.
템플릿 보기모바일 앱 만족도 및 피드백 설문
사용자가 앱에 얼마나 만족하는지, 어디에서 불편을 겪는지, 그리고 어떤 개선이 가장 중요한지를 측정하여 릴리스 상태를 추적하는 제품 및 모바일 팀을 위한 설문입니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 각 사용자의 만족도 점수 이면의 이야기를 파고들어, 그 점수를 형성한 구체적인 순간이나 기능을 드러냅니다.
템플릿 보기Video Game Difficulty, Progression & Monetization Feedback
Captures how players actually experience difficulty tuning, progression pacing, monetization fairness, and moment-to-moment session enjoyment. Built for game designers and live-ops teams tracking post-launch sentiment, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a player felt cheated by difficulty or monetization instead of a generic complaint.
템플릿 보기Importance vs. Satisfaction Gap Analysis
Find your biggest opportunities by measuring the same attributes twice — how much each matters, and how well you deliver it today. The gaps become your priority list, and slider matrices keep it fast enough that people actually finish. AI follow-ups dig into the biggest gap each respondent reports.
템플릿 보기