Push Notification UX: Timing, Frequency & Control Preferences
Measures user satisfaction with push notification experiences across timing, frequency, perceived control, and content value. Designed for product and UX teams optimizing notification strategies for mobile or web applications.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How long have you been using this product?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
- Not sure
Overall, how satisfied are you with the notification experience from this product?
How valuable were the promotional or marketing notifications you received from this product in the past 14 days?
Thinking about the past 14 days, how would you describe the overall frequency of notifications from this product?
In the past 14 days, how much control did you feel you had over the notifications you received from this product?
Based on your responses in this survey, what single change would most improve the notification experience for you?
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will help us improve the notification experience. You're all set.
Which devices do you primarily use to access this product? Select all that apply.
- iOS phone/tablet
- Android phone/tablet
- Desktop/laptop
- Wearable/smartwatch
- Other
How likely are you to recommend this product's notification settings and experience to a colleague or friend?
How valuable were the transactional notifications (e.g., order updates, account alerts) you received in the past 14 days?
What is the maximum number of non-urgent notifications per day you would prefer from this product?
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–5
- 6–10
- 11–15
- 16–20
- More than 20
- No limit
Rank the following notification control options by importance to you (1 = most important).
- Per-topic on/off toggles
- Per-channel mute (email, push, SMS)
- Frequency cap (max per day)
- Time windows / quiet hours
- Snooze for a set period
- Priority levels (only high/critical)
We'd like to understand your notification preferences a bit more. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier answers.
Which region are you located in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Prefer not to say
Which channels do you currently receive notifications from this product? Select all that apply.
- Mobile push
- SMS/Text
- In-app banners or badges
- Desktop push
- Browser (web) push
- Wearable/smartwatch
- In-product inbox/center
- None / I've turned off all notifications
How valuable were the social or community notifications (e.g., messages, mentions, activity updates) you received in the past 14 days?
During which time windows are non-urgent notifications acceptable to you? Select all that apply.
- 7–9 am
- 9 am–12 pm
- 12–2 pm
- 2–5 pm
- 5–8 pm
- 8–10 pm
- Weekends (daytime)
- Overnight (10 pm–7 am)
Should urgent or critical alerts be allowed to override your quiet hours / Do Not Disturb settings?
- Yes, always
- Yes, but only for specific categories I choose
- No, never
How clear and easy to understand are the titles or preview text of notifications you receive from this product?
If you were to set quiet hours (Do Not Disturb) for notifications, which window would fit best?
- 10 pm–7 am
- 11 pm–6 am
- 12 am–8 am
- Custom schedule
- I don't use quiet hours
Rank the following notification qualities by how important they are to you (1 = most important).
- Relevance (matches my interests/actions)
- Timeliness (sent at the right moment)
- Clarity (concise, understandable)
- Actionability (clear next step)
- Non-intrusiveness (respects my time)
- Reliability (accurate, no false alarms)
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Purpose-built for push notification UX, not generic satisfaction: dedicated items on channel usage, timing windows, quiet-hours/DND override rules, and preferred max daily frequency.
- Separately rates the value of promotional, transactional, and social/community notifications, plus clarity of titles/preview text, so teams can see which notification types are actually earning their keep.
- Includes two ranking exercises (control options and notification qualities) and an open-text question asking respondents for the single change that would most improve their experience.
- Adds an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes each respondent's stated preferences in their own words, something a static question list cannot do, with all prompts fully visible and results rolled into an auto-generated report.
QuestionPro
Product Satisfaction Survey Questions + Sample TemplateThis is a general product satisfaction guide with a sample question list rather than a notification-specific instrument, so it lacks any items on timing, frequency caps, quiet hours, or notification type value. It's useful as a broad starting point but would need substantial custom-building to address push notification UX specifically.
잘하는 점
- Backed by an established survey platform with advanced logic and question-type variety
- Article format offers sample question wording researchers can adapt
아쉬운 점
- No notification-specific questions (timing windows, quiet hours, per-channel value ratings) built in
- Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option
- No published methodology for how question quality or wording was validated
SurveyMonkey
Product Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose, fielding-ready product satisfaction template rather than one designed around notification behavior. It can capture broad satisfaction and NPS-style ratings but has no built-in structure for notification timing, frequency preferences, or control perception.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-send template on a widely used, high-distribution survey platform
- Established reporting dashboards for quantitative analysis
아쉬운 점
- No questions targeting notification timing, frequency limits, or quiet-hours preferences
- Fixed-question format with no adaptive AI or voice-based interview follow-up
- No per-response automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Product Satisfaction Survey TemplateA conversational-style, general product satisfaction template rather than a notification-specific survey. It may cover overall satisfaction well but offers nothing on notification channel mix, control ranking, or override rules for urgent alerts.
잘하는 점
- Chat-style conversational survey format that can feel more engaging than plain forms
- Template geared toward marketing/product satisfaction use cases
아쉬운 점
- No dedicated notification timing/frequency/control question set
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning or voice interview capability
- No ranking exercises or automated quality scoring for open responses
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Notification Preferences & Alert Fatigue Assessment
Measures cross-device notification overload, delivery preferences, and control priorities to inform UX improvements in alert management and reduce user fatigue.
템플릿 보기Neurodivergent Digital Accessibility & UX Barriers Assessment
Identifies specific design barriers, sensory preferences, and accessibility feature priorities for neurodivergent users. Designed for UX research teams seeking actionable insights to improve digital product inclusivity.
템플릿 보기MVP Usability & Value Proposition Assessment
Captures early adopter feedback on task completion ease, perceived value, bugs, and improvement priorities to inform MVP iteration decisions for product teams.
템플릿 보기기기 간 UX 평가: 제스처, 레이아웃 및 접근성
모바일, 태블릿, 데스크톱 기기 전반의 사용자 경험을 측정하며, 제스처 사용성, 레이아웃 탐색, 가독성, 접근성 기능 사용, 기기 간 일관성에 중점을 둡니다. 반응형 디자인 품질을 평가하는 UX 연구팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Navigation App Map Accuracy & Update Speed Assessment
Measures user perceptions of map/GPS accuracy, update timeliness, and improvement priorities in navigation apps. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to benchmark trust, identify pain points, and prioritize fixes.
템플릿 보기기능 폐지 위험 및 마이그레이션 준비도 설문
제품 기능을 폐지하기 전에 사용자 의존도, 대체 방안 패턴, 전환 준비 상태를 평가합니다. 데이터 기반의 폐지 여부(go/no-go) 결정을 내리는 제품팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기