모든 템플릿
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident Micromobility Safety & Parking Perceptions Survey

A civic research instrument for municipalities to assess resident perceptions and experiences with e-scooter and e-bike safety, parking compliance, and enforcement preferences. Suitable for both micromobility users and non-users.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 33개 · 약 14분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for taking part in this survey. Your responses will help the city understand how residents experience micromobility (e-scooters, e-bikes, and similar devices) and identify opportunities to improve safety, parking, and enforcement. This survey takes approximately 14 minutes. Participation is voluntary—you may skip any question or stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Please click Next to begin.

Q02
객관식

Where do you primarily live?

  • Within this city/municipality
  • In a neighboring community
  • I visit for work, school, or leisure but do not live here
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
객관식

In the last 12 months, have you used an e-scooter, e-bike, or similar micromobility device in this city at least once?

  • Yes
  • No
Q04
의견 척도

Based on what you have seen or heard in the last 3 months, how safe do you think micromobility is in this city?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q05
객관식

In the last 30 days, how often have you seen e-scooters or e-bikes parked in ways that block sidewalks, ramps, or doorways?

  • Very often
  • Often
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q06
의견 척도

To what extent do you support or oppose the city issuing fines for e-scooters or e-bikes that block sidewalks or ramps?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q07
AI 인터뷰

We would like to learn more about your experiences with micromobility in this city. Please share your thoughts and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will help inform safer, more accessible micromobility policies in this city.

Q10
객관식

How do you usually get around in this city? Select all that apply.

  • Walk
  • Public transit
  • Drive myself
  • Ride as a passenger
  • Micromobility (e-scooter/e-bike)
  • Taxi or ride-hail
  • Wheelchair or mobility device
  • Other
Q11
객관식

Which of the following have you used in this city in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Shared e-scooter
  • Shared e-bike
  • Personal e-scooter
  • Personal e-bike
  • Conventional bicycle
  • Other
  • None of the above
Q12
의견 척도

If you have ridden a micromobility device in this city in the last 3 months, how safe did you feel overall?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all safe최대:Very safe
Q13
객관식

How clear are the city's current rules about where e-scooters and e-bikes may be parked?

  • Very clear
  • Somewhat clear
  • Somewhat unclear
  • Very unclear
  • I am not aware of any rules
Q14
의견 척도

To what extent do you support or oppose setting speed limits for e-scooters and e-bikes in pedestrian areas?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q15
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, do you have any additional suggestions for improving micromobility safety, parking, or enforcement in this city?

Q16
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
객관식

In the last 30 days, how often did you ride a micromobility device in this city?

  • Daily or almost daily
  • 3–5 days per week
  • 1–2 days per week
  • A few times this month
  • Not in the last 30 days
Q18
의견 척도

If you have ridden in the last 3 months, how safe or unsafe did you feel riding in a designated bike lane?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q19
객관식

In the last 3 months, which of the following parking situations have you personally experienced with micromobility in this city? Select all that apply.

  • Found a designated parking area or corral
  • Parked on sidewalk without blocking access
  • Could not find a legal place to park
  • Received a warning or fine
  • Device tipped over after parking
  • Not applicable — did not park in the last 3 months
Q20
의견 척도

To what extent do you support or oppose requiring helmets for all e-scooter and e-bike riders?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q21
객관식

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Downtown/central area
  • Residential neighborhood near center
  • Suburban area
  • Rural or fringe area
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
객관식

If you have not used micromobility in this city, which of the following are reasons why? Select up to 3.

  • Concerns about safety
  • Lack of protected lanes or routes
  • Cost or pricing
  • Parking rules are unclear
  • Limited availability or coverage area
  • I do not need it for my trips
  • Physical accessibility barriers
  • Other (not listed)
  • Not applicable — I have used micromobility
Q23
의견 척도

How safe or unsafe did you feel riding in mixed traffic with motor vehicles?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q24
장문형

If you experienced difficulty finding parking or received a warning or fine, please briefly describe what happened.

Q25
의견 척도

To what extent do you support or oppose using geofencing technology to restrict riding in certain areas (e.g., busy pedestrian zones)?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q26
드롭다운

How long have you lived in this city?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • I do not live here
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
의견 척도

How safe or unsafe did you feel crossing intersections?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q28
의견 척도

To what extent do you support or oppose the city investing in educational campaigns about safe riding and parking rules?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q29
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college/technical
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q30
의견 척도

How safe or unsafe did you feel riding at night or in low-light conditions?

척도: 17
최소:Very unsafe최대:Very safe
Q31
객관식

Are you aware of how to report unsafe riding or improper parking in this city?

  • Yes, and I have submitted a report
  • Yes, but I have not reported anything
  • No, I am not aware of how to report
Q32
드롭다운

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Prefer not to say
Q33
객관식

In the last 12 months in this city, which of the following have you experienced while riding? Select all that apply.

  • A near-miss with a vehicle
  • A near-miss with a pedestrian
  • A minor injury (no medical visit)
  • An injury requiring medical care
  • Device malfunction or brake issue
  • Verbal conflict with another road user
  • None of the above

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Built specifically around micromobility and parking behavior — covering e-scooter/e-bike usage frequency, mode choice, and reasons for non-use — rather than being a generic safety questionnaire adapted to fit
  • Uses opinion-scale batteries to isolate distinct risk contexts (mixed traffic, intersections, night riding) and distinct policy levers (fines, speed limits, helmets, geofencing, education), giving municipalities granular, actionable breakdowns instead of one blended 'safety' score
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that lets residents elaborate on parking friction, near-misses, or enforcement experiences in their own words, with an open-text prompt afterward for policy suggestions — something a fixed-question form cannot adapt to
  • Closes the loop with demographic and residency questions (housing type, tenure, age, employment) so results can be segmented by rider vs. non-rider and neighborhood type, supporting equity-focused enforcement decisions

QuestionPro

University Campus Safety Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a safety-perception questionnaire template, but built for university campus security/crime concerns rather than municipal micromobility policy — the population (students), risk categories (campus crime, harassment), and policy asks are structurally different from what a city needs on e-scooter/e-bike safety and parking. It's useful mainly as a reference for how QuestionPro structures safety-perception item batteries, not as a ready-to-field micromobility instrument. Like most template-library pages, it presents a static question list rather than an adaptive interview.

잘하는 점

  • Established template library format with a documented sample questionnaire researchers can review before fielding
  • Organized around clear safety-perception constructs (perceived risk, reporting awareness), a pattern transferable to other civic safety topics
  • Backed by a full survey platform with standard distribution and reporting tools

아쉬운 점

  • Domain and audience mismatch: designed for campus security perceptions, not resident transportation/parking behavior, so questions would need substantial rewriting to be usable for micromobility research
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual incidents or parking disputes in a respondent's own words
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt logic behind question design

자주 묻는 질문

“Resident Micromobility Safety & Parking Perceptions Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 33개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome, and thank you for taking part in this survey. Your responses will help the city understand how residents experi…” · “Where do you primarily live?” · “In the last 12 months, have you used an e-scooter, e-bike, or similar micromobility device in this city at least once?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 33개를 약 14분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey

Measures resident satisfaction with local park amenities, safety, and programming to help municipal parks departments prioritize improvements and track service quality over time.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Parking App Usability & Enforcement Trust Assessment

Measures drivers' ease-of-use perceptions of parking apps, trust in local parking enforcement, and priorities for product improvement. Ideal for municipal transport teams and parking app product managers seeking actionable UX and compliance insights.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Microgrid Attitudes & Governance Preferences Survey

Measures resident support for community microgrids, preferred ownership models, participation willingness, and priority tradeoffs. Designed for municipal planners and civic organizations assessing community readiness for local energy infrastructure.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Micro-Fulfillment Center Neighborhood Impact Survey

Measures resident perceptions of how micro-fulfillment delivery hubs affect traffic, noise, safety, jobs, and quality of life, providing evidence for local planning, zoning, and permitting decisions.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Neighborhood Sidewalk Accessibility & Condition Assessment

A resident feedback instrument for municipalities and civic organizations to assess sidewalk accessibility, physical condition, ADA barriers, and maintenance priorities. Designed for community-wide distribution to inform walkability planning and repair prioritization.

템플릿 보기
Nonprofit & Civic

Ride-Hailing Rider Safety & Trust Assessment

Measures rider perceptions of safety, trust, incident prevalence, and feature priorities across ride-hailing platforms. Designed for CX and product teams seeking actionable insights to improve rider retention and safety outcomes.

템플릿 보기