Service Provider Trust & Value Attitude Survey
Measures how clients perceive the trust, expertise, and value of a professional or B2B services provider — built for agencies, consultancies, and account teams tracking client sentiment. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind trust and value ratings instead of stopping at the number.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which type of service have you used most recently from (Replace with your company/provider name)? (Template note: replace this list with your actual service lines before launching.)
- Consulting
- Legal
- Financial advisory
- IT or technical support
- Marketing/creative
- Other
Overall, how much do you trust this provider to do right by you?
How much do you agree with each statement about this provider?
- Responds quickly when I need help
- Understands my specific needs
- Communicates clearly and proactively
- Delivers work that meets expectations
- Charges a fair price for the value delivered
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with your company/provider name) to a colleague or peer? (Template note: swap in your actual provider name.)
When choosing or sticking with a service provider like this one, which factors matter most and least to you?
- Price and cost transparency
- Speed of response
- Depth of expertise
- Quality of communication
- Flexibility and customization
- Track record and reputation
- Ease of doing business (contracts, invoicing, etc.)
How likely are you to keep using this provider over the next 12 months?
- Very likely
- Somewhat likely
- Neutral
- Somewhat unlikely
- Very unlikely
Anchor on the respondent's trust and recommendation ratings and get a specific, recent example that explains the number — what happened, and how it shaped their view. If the ratings were low or they said they're unlikely to continue, probe exactly what would need to change for them to trust or recommend the provider more. If ratings were high, probe what could realistically make them reconsider, so we know where the relationship is fragile.
What industry does your organization primarily operate in?
- Technology
- Financial services
- Healthcare
- Manufacturing
- Retail/consumer
- Professional services
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How many employees does your organization have?
- 1-10
- 11-50
- 51-200
- 201-1000
- 1000+
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your role?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP/Executive
- Owner/Founder
- Other
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Your responses feed directly into how we prioritize improvements to the service you receive.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on the respondent's trust and recommendation ratings to dig into the specific 'why' behind the score, instead of stopping at a number
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale for trust, matrix agreement statements, recommendation likelihood, max-diff on decision factors) with qualitative depth from adaptive questioning
- Captures firmographic context (industry, company size, role) alongside retention intent, so trust and value scores can be segmented by account type
- Opens and closes with conversational chat messages that frame the survey as a genuine feedback exchange, which supports more candid responses feeding into an auto-generated report
QuestionPro
Services Attitude Survey TemplateA directly comparable static template for measuring attitudes toward a services provider. It offers a ready-to-field question set but, like most legacy survey tools, relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive probing. Good baseline template for teams that just need a standard instrument.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for measuring services attitudes, aligning closely with the topic
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad template library and distribution options
- Likely includes standard benchmarking/reporting features typical of QuestionPro's suite
아쉬운 점
- Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore the reasoning behind a rating
- No indication of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
- No transparent publishing of question/prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Customer Satisfaction Survey Template For Financial ServicesA satisfaction template scoped specifically to financial services rather than general B2B/professional services trust, so it's a partial fit at best. It's a fielding-ready static form built on SurveyMonkey's familiar editor, useful if your provider relationship is a financial institution.
잘하는 점
- Tailored wording for financial services customer contexts
- Easy to deploy quickly using SurveyMonkey's widely used survey builder
- Likely includes standard satisfaction/NPS-style question formats
아쉬운 점
- Industry-narrow (financial services) rather than general professional/B2B services trust and value
- No adaptive AI interview to follow up on low or high trust ratings
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Customer Attitude Survey TemplateA general customer attitude template, broader than a services-provider-specific trust survey, positioned under SurveySparrow's marketing template category. It's a static, conversational-style form rather than one with true adaptive AI-driven follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Conversational UI style that can feel more engaging than a plain form
- Generic enough to adapt to various customer attitude use cases
- Part of a broader marketing template library for quick setup
아쉬운 점
- Generic customer attitude focus, not built specifically around service-provider trust, expertise, and value
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview option
- No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt-level methodology disclosed
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Fast Food Customer Experience & Loyalty Survey
Measures satisfaction with speed, accuracy, food quality, and value at a quick-service restaurant, plus what drives repeat visits and recommendations. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened on the customer's most recent visit — especially when something went wrong — instead of settling for a star rating.
템플릿 보기Organizational SWOT Analysis Survey
Collects structured input from employees and leaders on your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, then uses a trade-off exercise and an AI follow-up interview to surface which single factor matters most right now and why. Built for strategy teams prepping a SWOT before a planning cycle or board review.
템플릿 보기Public Library Patron Experience & Usage Survey
Measures how often people use their local public library, which services they rely on, and how satisfied they are with staff, collections, hours, and digital access. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing what would actually get them back in the door more often — useful for library directors and city/county planning teams.
템플릿 보기University Bookstore Online Shopping Experience Survey
Measures how students find, evaluate, and buy course materials and campus gear through your online bookstore, including price perception and checkout friction. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened during a student's most recent order — especially where they hesitated, abandoned a cart, or got frustrated — so you can fix real drop-off points, not assumed ones.
템플릿 보기웹사이트 구축 프로세스 및 워크플로우 설문조사
개인과 팀이 웹사이트를 구축하거나 재설계하는 데 실제로 어떻게 시간을 사용하는지 — 어떤 도구에 의존하는지, 어디에서 마찰이 쌓이는지, 각 단계에서 얼마나 만족하는지를 파악합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰를 통해 응답자가 겪은 가장 큰 병목을 심층적으로 파악하여, 무슨 일이 있었는지와 (있다면) 어떤 우회 방법을 사용했는지 재구성합니다.
템플릿 보기Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)
Measures agreement with a set of statements using an even-numbered rating scale that removes the neutral midpoint, forcing respondents to lean agree or disagree rather than sit on the fence. Built for HR, product, and policy teams who want to reduce central-tendency bias in attitude research. The AI follow-up digs into the concrete reason behind each respondent's strongest lean and what would change their mind.
템플릿 보기