Industry-Specific

Statement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates how clearly a Statement of Work defined scope, deliverables, timelines, pricing, and change control for a specific client-vendor engagement, and how well execution matched what was written. Built for procurement, PMO, and agency teams reviewing SOW quality after project close, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the Statement of Work for this engagement. Your answers help us write clearer, more useful SOWs for future projects. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02

객관식

Which best describes your role in this engagement?

Client sponsor or business stakeholder
Client project manager
Vendor or agency project lead
Vendor or agency delivery team member
Procurement or legal reviewer

Q03

의견 척도필수

Before the project began, how clearly did the Statement of Work define the scope of work?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear

Q04

의견 척도필수

How well did the final deliverables match what was described in the Statement of Work?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Did not match at all최대:Matched completely

Q05

매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this Statement of Work?

5개 행 × 5개 열

Milestones and the overall timeline were realistic
Pricing and payment terms were clearly explained
Roles and responsibilities were clearly assigned to named parties
Acceptance criteria for deliverables were specific and measurable
The process for requesting and approving changes was clearly defined

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q06

객관식필수

Did this engagement require changes to scope, timeline, or budget beyond what the original Statement of Work covered?

No changes were needed
Yes, minor changes
Yes, significant changes
Not sure

Q07

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Which of these areas of the Statement of Work most need improvement for future engagements?

Scope definition
Timeline and milestones
Pricing structure
Payment terms
Roles and responsibilities
Acceptance criteria
Change order process
Communication cadence

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most needs improvement최악:Least needs improvement

Q08

평점 척도필수

Overall, how well did the Statement of Work serve as a governance tool for keeping this project on track?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Poor governance tool최대:Excellent governance tool

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct one specific moment during this engagement where the Statement of Work either prevented a problem or failed to prevent one — for example, a scope disagreement, an unclear deliverable, or a change order dispute. Ask what the SOW actually said at that point, what each side expected, and how the gap (if any) got resolved. If the respondent rated the SOW highly on all closed questions, probe for a near-miss they caught early instead of assuming nothing went wrong.

Q10

장문형

What's one thing that should have been spelled out in the Statement of Work but wasn't?

Q11

객관식

Roughly how large is your organization?

1-50 employees
51-250 employees
251-1,000 employees
1,001-5,000 employees
5,000+ employees
Prefer not to say

Q12

메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback feeds directly into a review of our Statement of Work template and process, so future engagements start with clearer expectations on all sides.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to reconstruct the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction, going beyond a static rating.
Pairs opinion-scale questions on scope clarity and deliverable match with a matrix statement-agreement question, so you get both quantifiable scores and nuanced sentiment on the same SOW.
Uses MaxDiff to force-rank which SOW sections (scope, deliverables, timeline, pricing, change control) most need improvement, giving PMO/procurement teams a prioritized fix list instead of generic feedback.
Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean procurement and PMO teams can review post-project SOW performance across many engagements without manually reading every open-ended answer.

SurveySparrow

Free Statement of Work Template

This is a form template for drafting/collecting the contents of a Statement of Work document (scope, deliverables, terms) at the start of an engagement, not a survey for evaluating how well a completed SOW performed after project close. It's fielding-ready as a data-capture form but built for the opposite point in the project lifecycle from QuestionPunk's retrospective evaluation template. Useful as a SOW intake tool, but not a comparable post-mortem instrument.

잘하는 점

Fielding-ready form builder on an established survey platform
Likely offers customizable fields for standard SOW components (scope, pricing, timeline)
Familiar SurveySparrow UI for distribution and response collection

아쉬운 점

Designed to help create a SOW, not to assess after-the-fact clarity or execution match against a signed SOW
No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct specific friction moments from scope ambiguity or change orders
No published methodology for quality scoring or automated post-engagement reporting

자주 묻는 질문