QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Education & Academic

Teacher Self-Evaluation and Reflective Practice Survey

A structured self-reflection for teachers covering instructional practices, classroom management, student engagement, and professional growth priorities, plus an AI follow-up interview that digs into a specific teaching moment behind the numbers instead of stopping at a rating.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This self-evaluation is a chance to reflect honestly on your teaching this year — there are no right answers, just your perspective. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It takes about 8 minutes and includes a short follow-up conversation about one moment from your teaching.

Q02
매트릭스필수

How often does each of the following describe your teaching this term?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • I clearly communicate the learning objective for the lesson
  • I adjust instruction for students with different skill levels or needs
  • I use quick checks (questions, exit tickets, polls) to see if students understood before moving on
  • I foster a classroom climate where students feel safe participating
  • I incorporate student feedback into how I plan lessons
  • 외 1개
열: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Every lesson
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective do you feel your instruction was this term?

척도: 1 – 10
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q04
객관식필수

In the last month, how often did you change your plan mid-class because students weren't getting it?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • About weekly
  • Most classes
  • Almost every class
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate your classroom management this year — keeping the room running smoothly and respectfully?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Needs a lot of work최대:Excellent
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Looking at the areas below, which would you most want to develop over the next year, and which is least of a priority for you right now?

  • Differentiating instruction for varied learners
  • Classroom management strategies
  • Using technology to support learning
  • Using formative assessment data to guide teaching
  • Culturally responsive teaching practices
  • Communicating with parents and families
  • Managing workload and time
  • Increasing student engagement and participation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most want to develop최악:Least priority right now
Q07
의견 척도필수

How confident do you feel using student data (grades, quizzes, assessments) to adjust how you teach?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q08
객관식

Which of these has been your biggest day-to-day challenge in the classroom this year?

  • Not enough time to plan or grade
  • Keeping students engaged
  • Reaching students at very different levels
  • Managing behavior
  • Giving timely, useful feedback
Q09
장문형

Describe one lesson or unit from this year you're genuinely proud of. What made it work?

Q10
AI 인터뷰

Ask the teacher to walk you through the specific lesson or moment they mentioned they're proud of (or, if they skipped it, a recent lesson they'd rate near their overall effectiveness score). Probe what students were struggling with beforehand, what the teacher specifically did differently, and how they knew it worked. If their effectiveness rating was low or their confidence in using data was low, gently explore what's getting in the way and what support would actually help.

Q11
객관식

How many years have you been teaching, including this year? (optional)

  • 1st year
  • 2-4 years
  • 5-9 years
  • 10-19 years
  • 20+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
단문형

What subject and/or grade level(s) do you primarily teach this year? (optional, e.g., '7th grade math')

Q13
객관식

What type of school do you teach at? (optional)

  • Public school
  • Private school
  • Charter school
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for taking the time to reflect. Your answers, along with our short conversation, will be used to shape your own professional growth plan and, in aggregate, to guide school-wide support and coaching.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond rating scales (matrix, opinion scale, max-diff on growth priorities) by including an AI follow-up interview that asks the teacher to walk through the specific lesson or moment behind their answers, not just record a number.
  • Pairs quantitative self-assessment (instructional effectiveness, classroom management rating, data-use confidence) with open reflection prompts like describing a lesson they're proud of, then probes that story further.
  • Captures context (years teaching, subject/grade, school type) as optional fields so results can be segmented without forcing every respondent to answer.
  • Closes with a transparent thank-you/consent message about how responses and the short conversation will be used, keeping the process clear to participants.

Jotform

Teacher Self Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form builder template covering standard teacher self-evaluation categories. It's built for quick deployment and easy editing with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, but it's a static form rather than an interactive interview. No mention of any follow-up questioning beyond what's typed by the survey designer.

잘하는 점

  • Fast to customize and deploy via Jotform's builder
  • Familiar form-based UI for respondents
  • Likely supports standard field types (ratings, text, choice)

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — respondents answer fixed questions only
  • No voice interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Teacher Self Evaluation Form

Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format makes a static self-evaluation feel more engaging than a traditional form. It's a fielding-ready template, but the conversational feel is a fixed UI pattern, not a dynamic AI interview that adapts based on what a teacher actually says.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational question flow improves completion rates
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording
  • Good mobile-friendly respondent experience

아쉬운 점

  • No genuine adaptive AI probing — question order and logic are pre-set, not generated from responses
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share task capability
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

This is a survey-template/example-questions page combining student course evaluation and teacher evaluation content, more of a reference library than a single fielding-ready teacher self-reflection instrument. Useful for question ideas, but it's oriented around student-rated teacher evaluation rather than a teacher's own structured self-reflection.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of sample evaluation questions to draw from
  • Established survey platform with standard question types
  • Covers both course and teacher evaluation angles

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a question-bank/guide rather than a packaged self-evaluation instrument
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No transparent, teacher-specific per-response quality scoring or auto-generated reflective report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Education & Academic

교육 세션 사후 피드백 및 효과 설문

교육 세션이 어떻게 전달되었는지 — 콘텐츠 품질, 강사의 효과성, 새로운 기술을 적용하는 자신감 — 를 파악하여 L&D 팀과 강사에게 제공합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 추천 점수 이면의 실제 이야기를 파고듭니다: 배운 내용을 활용하는 데 구체적으로 무엇이 도움이 되었거나 방해가 되었는지 알아봅니다.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Group Project Peer Evaluation Survey

Captures how students rate a teammate's contribution, communication, reliability, and work quality on a shared project, plus how they'd split credit across the team. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific behavior behind the rating instead of settling for a vague number, giving instructors evidence to catch free-riders and recognize strong collaborators.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Student Perception of Course Quality Survey

Captures how students genuinely experience a course or program — clarity of teaching, fairness, workload, and engagement — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors, program leads, and academic affairs teams who want more than end-of-term star ratings.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Parent Exit Survey: Understanding School Withdrawals

For K-12 schools that want to understand why families disenroll, this survey captures the stated reason, satisfaction across key factors, and where the child is heading next. An AI follow-up interview digs past the checkbox answer to the real timeline of dissatisfaction and what might have changed the outcome — insight schools can act on to reduce future attrition.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Parent Feedback on Nonprofit Education Program

Gathers feedback from parents and guardians whose children participate in a nonprofit's educational program — covering communication, perceived impact on the child, satisfaction, and likelihood to continue — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment or interaction behind their impact rating.

템플릿 보기
Education & Academic

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

템플릿 보기